Does this article bolster your belief in extraterrestrial life?
The article:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/11/05/sc ... %20planets
PhilX
[edited by iMod]
Intelligent Life?
Re: Intelligent Life?
Nope. They ain't none!Philosophy Explorer wrote:Does this article bolster your belief in extraterrestrial life?
The article:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/11/05/sc ... %20planets
PhilX
[edited by iMod]
Re: Intelligent Life?
I am sure there is intelligent life out there somewhere. Nothing on Earth by which to judge it though. 
Re: Intelligent Life?
The best that science can say right now, is that we don't know what's out there.
- hammock
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:21 pm
- Location: Heckville, Dorado; Republic of Lostanglia
Re: Intelligent Life?
Doesn't bolster my belief in complex life being so thick that an interstellar probe couldn't avoid tripping over it; or so thick that astronomers couldn't avoid having their celestial views of another solar system being obscured by colossal engineering projects constructed by octodecillions of nanobots and larger machines.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Does this article bolster your belief in extraterrestrial life? The article:
"Astronomers reported that there could be as many as 40 billion habitable Earth-size planets in the galaxy, based on a new analysis of data from NASA’s Kepler spacecraft. One out of every five sunlike stars in the galaxy has a planet the size of Earth circling it in the Goldilocks zone — not too hot, not too cold — where surface temperatures should be compatible with liquid water, according to a herculean three-year calculation based on data from the Kepler spacecraft by Erik Petigura, a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley."
And yet, strangely, I've yet to hear of a true twin of the Earth being found among the extrasolar planets. Their idea of such includes "five times the size of Earth and revolving around a red dwarf star in just 36 days", like Gliese 832c.