Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of God?

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Soren
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:23 am

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Soren »

Thanks for all the lengthy responses...I find them all interesting. This one is controversial for many...but I say emphatically HELL NO :!: There are so many christians in my class so I'm sure I'll get backlash. I have to say that everyone has rewritten the bible, Koran,....how can anyone claim it was even from God in the first place.
Look at the Mormons for example...that is so f*%$% laughable. But whats pathetic is he was able to sell his sacred scripture and pass it off as the restored bible. He said God and Jesus appeared before him and told him where to find the buried "gold scripted plates that was the new gospel". The mormon church has 15 million members world wide and 15K missionaries. What ever believe in whatever makes you happy but don't hate on those that think it's no different than believing in Santa Clause.
This was the post that got me raising the issue of justification of (dis)belief here. As you can see, it analogizes from The Book of Mormon to "religions" generally, and notably to Muslims and Christians in specific. Then it raises the analogy with Santa as well.

Now, my assumption that R2 would not make statements without some sort of evidence or proof on hand is a charitable one. It also seems it was perhaps all TOO charitable, as we have yet to see such evidence appear.
Blaggard
Posts: 2245
Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Blaggard »

Greylorn Ell wrote:
Thanks for this information! 95% of it is new for me. I've used [sup] etc. on some of the more technical forums, noted also that it does not work here. And while I've used LaTeX for technical material and HTML for a book and website, I'd no idea that any forums accepted these formats. Figured that they were too arcane for most users, so never tried them.

Very helpful! :D
You are more than welcome trust me, when I first started posting on forums back in the stone age, I was aghast at how hard it was to do all that stuff, but over time you pick it up. Happy to pass on the info so someone else doesn't have to suffer with language as I did in the days when Jesus was walking with dinosaurs or whatever. :D

It's worth noting that wiki uses latex within math tags, but only in so far as you can quite easily copy the image location with a right click and get the math that way simply by posting in img tags. :)

I suppose the reason Hyper Text Markup Language (HTML) is still universal is basically because if it aint broke don't fix it. :P

As I said it would be nice if all forums had LaTeX, but the sheer expense of obtaining a business license means they are usually only found on science or maths forums, and only those who are large.
3Sum
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:54 pm

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by 3Sum »

attofishpi wrote:Only a thoroughbred atheist would suggest a man purported to be the Christ turning water to wine is a logical contradiction. If..and it is, God is all dimensions then you would understand that miracles do not happen, there is nothing contradictory to logic with such power of simply turning water to wine.

Or am i just gullible?
Oh, but of course you're right attofishpi. A creator of the freaking universe sends his son to earth in barbaric times when nobody could even record his presence, in a remote part of the planet where his son turns water to wine to prove his divinity. Makes almost as much sense as God sacrificing himself to himself so he can save us from himself because of the flaws he himself designed us with.

Thing is, if you're going to take Christianity for serious, at least be consistent and start taking other fairy tales for serious too. Harry Potter might be true, right? I mean, if there truly were wizards they would surely be able to hide themselves from us?

Cause right now, it seems to me that you're extremely biased and partial to one specific fairy tale for which there is no more evidence than for some other fairy tale.
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by uwot »

Soren, I think you are confusing:
There is no evidence of god.
And:
There is evidence of no god.
It is nonsense to demand evidence of no evidence, and I don't think anyone is claiming the latter.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by attofishpi »

Blaggard wrote:Depends do you believe a man was born in Israel about 2000 give or take years ago and could do magic?

What do you base this belief on? Ie evidence, history etc.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l5p6S7aXGY

Just for context:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS5-uYLiKmw

:P
Damit couldn't get the first vid to play right thru...like that humour tho.

I don't believe in miracles or magic...when you understand the implications of a God that is all dimensions then you can comprehend a simple task of turning water to wine...and ive seen far more than that, which is what i base my belief on:- personal experience.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by attofishpi »

Greylorn Ell wrote:No thoroughbred at all, I am a mutt. I am neither atheist nor agnostic, and subscribe to no religious opinions other than my own, which are derived from the only valid source of thoughts about the Creator or Creators-- the physical universe itself.
So you accept that there are Creator or Creators to our reality...yet you consider a man that stated that he was the embodiment of a creator or the progeny of such a being to be unlikely to be able to turn water to wine?
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by attofishpi »

3Sum wrote:Oh, but of course you're right attofishpi. A creator of the freaking universe sends his son to earth in barbaric times when nobody could even record his presence, in a remote part of the planet where his son turns water to wine to prove his divinity. Makes almost as much sense as God sacrificing himself to himself so he can save us from himself because of the flaws he himself designed us with.

Thing is, if you're going to take Christianity for serious, at least be consistent and start taking other fairy tales for serious too. Harry Potter might be true, right? I mean, if there truly were wizards they would surely be able to hide themselves from us?

Cause right now, it seems to me that you're extremely biased and partial to one specific fairy tale for which there is no more evidence than for some other fairy tale.
You really think nobody could record his presence. He didnt turn water to wine to prove anything, there was a wedding and no wine...maybe it was to prove he was a good bloke :wink:
The sacrificing bit is spot on. I have considered this many times. I have gone through literal hell many times at the 'hands' of our 'loving' God, I have hated it and Christ more than you can ever imagine, and when i have returned to peace i ponder the same question.
I will state i know God exists. I know i can pretty much call it any name under the sun except one. When it comes to Christ however, if i start calling Christ names in a fit of hate, a voice rings out 'You have crossed the line'...yep and a lesser form of hell returns until i apologise.

To compare thousands of years of man's interpretation and interaction with the divine written into various scripture a fairy tale is to render yourself a sap.
User avatar
WanderingLands
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by WanderingLands »

R2D2 wrote:Is there a reliable test for determining whether any purported work of sacred scripture is truly the word of God? What is it? Does any work of scripture pass that test? Would members of other religions agree?
A reliable test?

I'd say that is a bit ignorant to try and measure God up to par with the materialist paradigm of "Science". You cannot really "test" to see if God exists; what you can do is experience it.

Also, I believe that you ought to look into the field of Comparative Religion. Maybe study the beliefs and customs of various religious and cultural characteristics of the bountiful regions of Earth. Maybe also look at the religious symbols and allegories; find the deeper meaning of them.

Maybe look at the Occult?
Greylorn Ell
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:13 pm
Location: SE Arizona

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Greylorn Ell »

HexHammer wrote:
R2D2 wrote:Soren...I'm bored....btw I'm a she not a he :wink:
Lies! Everybody knows R2D2 is a guy robot!
Everybody? We all noticed the little rotating thingy that came out to interfere with Death Star control circuitry, a nice twist. But there was also that little chirrupy voice pitched above 200 Hertz. Didn't you wonder just a little?
Greylorn Ell
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:13 pm
Location: SE Arizona

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Greylorn Ell »

R2D2 wrote:Soren...I'm bored....btw I'm a she not a he :wink:
Delighted to find a female philosopher and Star Wars appreciator. They are not as rare as female engineers, but scarce enough. You might have given us a clue with a handle such as R2Dee2.
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by HexHammer »

Greylorn Ell wrote:
HexHammer wrote:
R2D2 wrote:Soren...I'm bored....btw I'm a she not a he :wink:
Lies! Everybody knows R2D2 is a guy robot!
Everybody? We all noticed the little rotating thingy that came out to interfere with Death Star control circuitry, a nice twist. But there was also that little chirrupy voice pitched above 200 Hertz. Didn't you wonder just a little?
Androgyne robot that is!
Greylorn Ell
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:13 pm
Location: SE Arizona

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Greylorn Ell »

Blaggard wrote: As I said it would be nice if all forums had LaTeX, but the sheer expense of obtaining a business license means they are usually only found on science or maths forums, and only those who are large.
Is this true? I thought that TeX and LaTeX operated under some kind of open license. I paid for the LaTeX packages that I used in business and to produce copyrighted material, but saw no mention of a license requirement that restricted my use of it.

If there is a problem, perhaps we could appeal to Leslie Lamport's philosophical side to give PNow free usage in exchange for a permanent subscription, and then convince Rick to kill the time necessary on his end. Gentle clamoring might do the job. :?:
Greylorn Ell
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:13 pm
Location: SE Arizona

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Greylorn Ell »

3Sum wrote:
attofishpi wrote:Only a thoroughbred atheist would suggest a man purported to be the Christ turning water to wine is a logical contradiction. If..and it is, God is all dimensions then you would understand that miracles do not happen, there is nothing contradictory to logic with such power of simply turning water to wine.

Or am i just gullible?
Oh, but of course you're right attofishpi. A creator of the freaking universe sends his son to earth in barbaric times when nobody could even record his presence, in a remote part of the planet where his son turns water to wine to prove his divinity. Makes almost as much sense as God sacrificing himself to himself so he can save us from himself because of the flaws he himself designed us with.

Thing is, if you're going to take Christianity for serious, at least be consistent and start taking other fairy tales for serious too. Harry Potter might be true, right? I mean, if there truly were wizards they would surely be able to hide themselves from us?

Cause right now, it seems to me that you're extremely biased and partial to one specific fairy tale for which there is no more evidence than for some other fairy tale.
3sum,
I am compelled to empathize with atto's position, having once believed the Church's teachings. Atomic physics 401 made it pretty clear that the wine into water trick would have released enough thermonuclear energy to vaporize all of Jerusalem, because it required the synthesis of carbon, sulphur, nitrogen, and other atoms from a solution of hydrogen and oxygen. Assuming that Christ existed and either knew all about atomic physics and the laws of thermodynamics, I figured that, God or not, he had to have been clever enough to buy a few nice barrels of wine, have some friends stash them in the back room of the wedding hall, then have those same friends label them H2O and conduct a simple exchange while the already intoxicated revelers were too drunk to pay much attention. Simple magic without the thermonuclear penalty.

There is another version of the Christ tale that you might find curious.

Suppose that planet earth is not ruled by God the Creator because he is more interested in the quadrillions of other planets that are populated with more intelligent beings. Earth is thus ruled by low-level spirit administrators, spook bureaucrats who change positions and gain or lose power now and then. Christ was a new administrator who decided to introduce a better religion to earth's denizens.

So he incarnated in human form, with extraordinary intelligence, psychic skills, charisma, and purpose. His choice of locale was perfect. He found a backwater country on the fringe of the expanding Roman empire, sufficiently distant from Rome and its stay-at-home priests so that his new teachings would be ignored until they had taken root. His used his charisma to teach. His superior knowledge of the laws of physics, human biology, and human nature were put to work in the context of paranormal skills, producing a number of remarkable and convincing healings and the loss of an infected fig tree.

A dramatic exit, which he no doubt left his body to observe, followed up by a resurrection that did not go quite as planned and required a temporary spook body that could make but a few token appearances, was enough to set the stage. The expanding Roman Empire was infected with the virus of Christianity. It spread everywhere, west and northward, and back into Rome itself.

But viruses have a tendency to mutate, and Christ, from his no longer incorporated position as bureaucratic administrator, did not take steps to kill the mutations.

The Gnostics were the first mutators, as they tried to fill in the metaphysical gaps that J.C. failed to address during his sojourn. Conflicting sects arose everywhere. Paul, the Roman butcher and phoney apostle who was probably gay, decided to kill Christianity by distorting its focus onto sex, declaring fun to be evil and thus teaching the church that the way to control its members was to circumcise their enjoyment of life and love.

Constantine, the big Roman, destroyed Christ's church by politicizing and standardizing it, and we know much of the rest of the story. But I kind of like Christ. He had a good plan, and must have learned a lot about human nature from his attempt to implement it.
Soren
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:23 am

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Soren »

Soren, I think you are confusing:
There is no evidence of god.
And:
There is evidence of no god.
It is nonsense to demand evidence of no evidence, and I don't think anyone is claiming the latter.
Nope. Not even remotely confused.

Anyone who makes an affirmative statement of some kind needs to explain what evidence he/she has to back it. R2 has made an affirmative claim. She owes us evidence.

As for the statement "there is no evidence of God," that is an affirmative claim. It says that no person, in any place, has ever had evidence for God, and no one alive and currently has evidence for God.

How could R2 know that? Surely it is not too much to ask that she back her claim with proof. Anyone who does not understand that does not grasp even the most basic logic.

So quit running a filibuster, and pony up the evidence or admit you've bluffed; because those are the only two alternatives there are.
User avatar
Bill Wiltrack
Posts: 5456
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:52 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Contact:

Re: Is any purported work of sacred scripture the word of Go

Post by Bill Wiltrack »

.









.....................................
Image









.
Post Reply