Peter Williams claims that Richard Dawkins is a good writer but a poor logician, and attempts to prove it with examples of some formal fallacies.
http://philosophynow.org/issues/44/Darw ... of_Science
Darwin’s Rottweiler & the Public Understanding of Science
-
Philosophy Now
- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:49 am
Re: Darwin’s Rottweiler & the Public Understanding of Scienc
Dawkins has an impressive gift for marketing, ie. self promotion.
He may be a good or even great scientist, I'm not qualified to say.
He's a lousy theologian, and...
A nitwit as a forum owner.
Which is to say, he's just like all the rest of us, great at some things and not so great at others.
He may be a good or even great scientist, I'm not qualified to say.
He's a lousy theologian, and...
A nitwit as a forum owner.
Which is to say, he's just like all the rest of us, great at some things and not so great at others.