pyramids are they representations of locality
pyramids are they representations of locality
are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Pyramids are many thing, but they are unrelated to QM in any meaningful way.jackles wrote:are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
Pyramids are primarily about the expression of political and religious power.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Yes but why would an eye be usually seen at top.the freemasons use this symbol on there regalier.all things have connection.the eye to me represents nonlocation or omni presents.the pyramid represents place or location on the physical plain.omni present sizeless ness the all seeing time and spaceless eye.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Why would any crack-pot society use any bunch of mystical symbolism?jackles wrote:Yes but why would an eye be usually seen at top.the freemasons use this symbol on there regalier.all things have connection.the eye to me represents nonlocation or omni presents.the pyramid represents place or location on the physical plain.omni present sizeless ness the all seeing time and spaceless eye.
If you put an eye on a pyramid, that does not make a pyramid anything more than it already was.
A Pyramid is a square based 3D shape whose four corners extend equally to a point in in the vertical plain. It doesn't mean shit.
The eye of providence is not an item of Egyptian mysticism, but a late Medieval Xian symbol adopted by a boy's own aristo club called the Masons, who banded together to protect the interests of their own class, and its economic interests.
Only a fool would be sucked into this.
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
http://www.history.com/shows/ancient-al ... ien-theory
I think it was probably the Grays although I wouldn't rule out the Awful Green Things....
-Imp
I think it was probably the Grays although I wouldn't rule out the Awful Green Things....
-Imp
- hammock
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:21 pm
- Location: Heckville, Dorado; Republic of Lostanglia
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
jackles wrote:are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
No ancient reflection of current knowledge. In Egypt, they expressed the now extinct faith of the pharaohs. The structure was like a representational staircase or mountain climb of the dead ruler's spiritual ascent to becoming a god. Also served as tomb for protecting the body, which apparently had to endure to sustain the soul's immortality. Ridiculous overkill, since the monuments did not prevent robbers and advertised all the more, like the equivalent of neon lights, that "Here be a stash of riches". No vast, land-roaming search required as with hidden burial sites.
The pyramids of Meso-America offered an impressive stage for religious rituals and human sacrifices. Sometimes not even death of human or animal being involved. Just a ruler or priest running a rough cord through a hole in the tongue to get an ample offering of royal or sacerdotal blood gushing into or onto the sacred whatever objects. Demonstrate to the crowd that it wasn't always sold children, older virgins, and prisoners of war that were "willing" to appease the gods with their bashed skulls, torn hearts, or variously butchered bodies. Those good ol' boys and gals at the Top could make their limited contributions of suffering and hemorrhaging, too.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
All the later pyramids did not have the "steps" upward like some sort of stairway to heaven.hammock wrote:jackles wrote:are Pyramids representations of location.with the pyramid its self representing the physical plain or location.the top or the point where an eye is somtimes seen represents nonlocality.nonlocality is the central theme of quantum machanics
No ancient reflection of current knowledge. In Egypt, they expressed the now extinct faith of the pharaohs. The structure was like a representational staircase or mountain climb of the dead ruler's spiritual ascent to becoming a god. Also served as tomb for protecting the body, which apparently had to endure to sustain the soul's immortality. Ridiculous overkill, since the monuments did not prevent robbers and advertised all the more, like the equivalent of neon lights, that "Here be a stash of riches". No vast, land-roaming search required as with hidden burial sites.
The pyramids of Meso-America offered an impressive stage for religious rituals and human sacrifices. Sometimes not even death of human or animal being involved. Just a ruler or priest running a rough cord through a hole in the tongue to get an ample offering of royal or sacerdotal blood gushing into or onto the sacred whatever objects. Demonstrate to the crowd that it wasn't always sold children, older virgins, and prisoners of war that were "willing" to appease the gods with their bashed skulls, torn hearts, or variously butchered bodies. Those good ol' boys and gals at the Top could make their limited contributions of suffering and hemorrhaging, too.
They were all clad in completely sheer, smooth polished marble, all of which has been robbed away as the centuries have passed. The step appearance of the big 3 at Giza, for example, are all the result of vandalism
What a Sight they must have been reflecting the sun.
Such is the power of belief. It's a shame no one ever believed a thing that was true.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Its my belief the pyramids are repsentations of universal place or location.the piont at the top is what the pyramid and the rest of the universe is inside . which is the consciousness of the observing localised being.so in effect the observer is walking around in a nonlocal never happened consciousness.the piont goes from local sizelike happening into sizeless nonlocal never happened consciosness which the whole universe sits in.sizeless donsnt mean small.it means limitless.the piont at the top of the pyramid is limitless consiousness.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
If this is not an example of "belief" not being worth a shit I don't know what is.jackles wrote:Its my belief the pyramids are repsentations of universal place or location.
The fact of the matter is that it is of no matter or consequence what you belief the pyramids "represent". You can have them represent anything you like. But without evidence, or any historical reference, that belief will remain your alone.
And do you believe a pyramid will sharpen any razors you place under them over-night too?jackles wrote:
the piont at the top is what the pyramid and the rest of the universe is inside . which is the consciousness of the observing localised being.so in effect the observer is walking around in a nonlocal never happened consciousness.the piont goes from local sizelike happening into sizeless nonlocal never happened consciosness which the whole universe sits in.sizeless donsnt mean small.it means limitless.the piont at the top of the pyramid is limitless consiousness.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
About the razors i dont know maybe maybe not.its worth a shot though if you just happen to bump into one.
- hammock
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:21 pm
- Location: Heckville, Dorado; Republic of Lostanglia
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
jackles wrote:Its my belief the pyramids are repsentations of universal place or location.the piont at the top is what the pyramid and the rest of the universe is inside . which is the consciousness of the observing localised being.so in effect the observer is walking around in a nonlocal never happened consciousness.the piont goes from local sizelike happening into sizeless nonlocal never happened consciosness which the whole universe sits in.sizeless donsnt mean small.it means limitless.the piont at the top of the pyramid is limitless consiousness.
Sounds
like another anachronistic trend that people wander into. Where today's fashions, sci-tech concepts, and socio-ideological sensitivities are at least partially projected upon a past era. Usually sported in the "what-if" products of a genre of alternate historical fiction in the entertainment industry; but there can also be literal, outrageous attempts to revise / edit the "memory archives of civilization". In this case, maybe you're as much tossing centuries-later Pythagorean mysticism into the potpourri as quantum physics. Call it "nile-punk" or "lotus-punk", if you are / were actually less serious or indulging in a facetious brand of sci-fi / art.
"The suffix -Punk, when it is put near to another suggestive technological / social era, identifies cultural movements of people who, while are attracted to the core tropes of a given era, are not or not only interested in historical accuracy." [Examples: steampunk, dieselpunk, Teslapunk, clockpunk, swordpunk, etc]
Vaguely calls to mind the "just say no to the history of ideas" phase of early analytic philosophy; the latter presented for awhile as a para-philosophical alternative to Plato's tradition. Where the few older thinkers that were evaluated [still considered ancestrally / marginally important] had their work often amusingly misinterpreted / misunderstood. As if those dead white guys had been futuro-spectively trying to satisfy a 20th century Anglophone-centered audience and its own box of intellectual eccentricities, conceptual passions, and habits / goals / conceits. Rather than writing in the context of the issues, frameworks, and anticipated critical receptions / reviews of their own times.
- - - - - - -
http://egyptianchristianity.com/hebrew_ ... ents_2.htm
"... Another dramatic departure from the traditional view is that the cosmos is now seen as an integrated system that, in some mysterious way, is profoundly unified. Indeed, one of the most stunning insights from modern science has been the discovery of 'nonlocality.' Things that are seemingly separate are really connected in fundamental ways that transcend the limitations of ordinary space and time. Still another astounding discovery is that immense levels of energy flow through the Universe and continuously regenerate it. As physicist Brian Swimme explains,'"The Universe emerges out of an all-nourishing abyss not only 15 billion years ago but in every moment.' Everything in the cosmos is a flowing movement that arises with everything else, moment by moment, in a process of continuous regeneration. Some scientists now suggest that, not only is our Universe alive, it has also evolved through natural selection.
"These Ancient Spiritual Masters both both knew and understood that our existence as mankind is identical to the Universe as a whole and the Universe as a whole is identical to our existence. Each individual human life is a microcosm of the life of the Universe. Such a view of Creation meant that man was aware that Divine Power (neteru and the manifestations of God) confronted men and women wherever they turned. Many, many neters inhabited the animal, vegetable, and mineral world of Egypt. The neters are drawn from the creative images of the land itself. Let me give you one example. Egypt received a yearly inundation - an annual flood - of the Nile. Receiving little if any rain...."
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Well thats a bit of a mixed pot .but the last bit realy rings true to my own belief.about the universe that is.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
QED: belief is of no consequence or importance.jackles wrote:Well thats a bit of a mixed pot .but the last bit realy rings true to my own belief.about the universe that is.
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
May be you have been watching to much telly.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: pyramids are they representations of locality
Odd thing to say.jackles wrote:May be you have been watching to much telly.
You can believe whatever you want, it's still meaningless unless it is justified in some way.