So what use the thousand words.Thats the trouble with pictures, as the artists have found, they never quite say what you want them to say. Unlike words of course.
You want to be nice? Try discussing your posts when others raise questions.
duszek wrote:A person can impress by subtle things. By the absence of ... certain elements which make you feel weary.
You tired and want to be manipulated? Be my guest.
Philosophically Bill is outright barking. If he's not then he's outright manipulative, if not then it's back to barking. Me, I just think him another in a long-line of gnus.
Philosophically Bill is outright barking. If he's not then he's outright manipulative, if not then it's back to barking. Me, I just think him another in a long-line of gnus
You seem to have accused Bill Wiltrack of not being philosophical in terms of his Eastern
mysticism. Can you tell me at what juncture Philosophy became a science ?
Lakin wrote:You seem to have accused Bill Wiltrack of not being philosophical in terms of his Eastern
mysticism. ...
Nope, I accuse Bill of not following the Eastern tradition whilst cobbling together his own pseudo version. I accuse Bill of being antithetical towards the Western tradition in his support for illiteracy and his anti-reason stance. And last but not least for a stance based upon, by his own admittance, no reading of the subject itself.
Can you tell me at what juncture Philosophy became a science ?
Nope, I accuse Bill of not following the Eastern tradition whilst cobbling together his own pseudo version. I accuse Bill of being antithetical towards the Western tradition in his support for illiteracy and his anti-reason stance. And last but not least for a stance based upon, by his own admittance, no reading of the subject itself.
I will ask you again since you don't get it : Can you tell me at what juncture Philosophy became a science.
