wow, what a turd. so much for offering hand of friendshipmarjoramblues wrote:What if...Hjarloprillar wrote:what if.. you did?
i'd be happy that someone gave damn.
'poor me' yes i know.
truth be told i come to this form cause im a loner and a shutin.
i chose to be so after a life of women booze and sex.
poor me
I didn't give a damn about your happiness; that my happiness was more important ?
Why would I slap a shoe tin?
Aah...
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/shutin
My God, you learn summat new every day...
How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
- Hjarloprillar
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:36 am
- Location: Sol sector.
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
-
marjoramblues
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:37 am
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
<<wow, what a turd. so much for offering hand of friendship>>
There I go, being misunderstood again...
sheesh
Take care !
There I go, being misunderstood again...
sheesh
Take care !
- Hjarloprillar
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:36 am
- Location: Sol sector.
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
thinking before one speaks tends to work. try it.marjoramblues wrote:<<wow, what a turd. so much for offering hand of friendship>>
There I go, being misunderstood again...
sheesh![]()
Take care !
As all i have is your words. being misunderestimated as G W Bush is . is easy to do.
i am not an an enemy.. just another
shoe tin
-
marjoramblues
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:37 am
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
Trouble is, I did thinkHjarloprillar wrote:thinking before one speaks tends to work. try it.marjoramblues wrote:<<wow, what a turd. so much for offering hand of friendship>>
There I go, being misunderstood again...
sheesh![]()
Take care !
the shoe tin
I didn't understand what a 'shutin' was; then I decided to be 'funny' with your request to be slapped...with the suggestion that it would not make me happy...
My attempt to lighten mood failed.
Should have gone with a turd-ish slap after all...
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
Maybe too much divergence?
That's the argument for convergence, right there, what happened above. People becoming more alike would lead to understanding one another better.
If the whole world converges, fascism becomes impossible, as does every other extreme nationalism or partisanship. Without an enemy on whom to focus all the people's resentment and anxiety, the power-mad can't promote militarism. And, of course, as serious as the present problems are, co-operation would be optimal - perhaps life-saving. (Obviously, evolution is much too slow: in order to evolve, we'd have to survive another twenty millennia.)
The cosmopolitan New World cities are making some progress toward homogeneity through intermarriage, but the far greater portion of mankind is kept behind borders, never mixing with very different types. International media and internet connection allows us glimpses of those do not look like ourselves, and teach us about other cultures; more people everywhere are becoming bi- or multi-lingual; international commerce allows us to become familiar with new kinds of food, clothing, vehicles and technological devices; quite a large number is affluent enough to travel. Oddly enough, the most convergence-causing phenomenon is crisis. With so many and frequent disasters, both natural and man-made, all over the world, emergency aid brings people together as nothing else can: we suffer the same way and help the same way, whatever else we may do differently.
So, that's the other side.
That's the argument for convergence, right there, what happened above. People becoming more alike would lead to understanding one another better.
If the whole world converges, fascism becomes impossible, as does every other extreme nationalism or partisanship. Without an enemy on whom to focus all the people's resentment and anxiety, the power-mad can't promote militarism. And, of course, as serious as the present problems are, co-operation would be optimal - perhaps life-saving. (Obviously, evolution is much too slow: in order to evolve, we'd have to survive another twenty millennia.)
The cosmopolitan New World cities are making some progress toward homogeneity through intermarriage, but the far greater portion of mankind is kept behind borders, never mixing with very different types. International media and internet connection allows us glimpses of those do not look like ourselves, and teach us about other cultures; more people everywhere are becoming bi- or multi-lingual; international commerce allows us to become familiar with new kinds of food, clothing, vehicles and technological devices; quite a large number is affluent enough to travel. Oddly enough, the most convergence-causing phenomenon is crisis. With so many and frequent disasters, both natural and man-made, all over the world, emergency aid brings people together as nothing else can: we suffer the same way and help the same way, whatever else we may do differently.
So, that's the other side.
Last edited by Skip on Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
marjoramblues
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:37 am
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
Where is the Understanding pill ?Skip wrote:Maybe too much divergence? Or maybe not enough?
Would it be right to slip it into the freshwater supply?
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
Only if you put the sane pill in first. (the small green one; costs about $0.02 to produce and sells for $0.03 to cover packaging and delivery)
-
marjoramblues
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:37 am
- Hjarloprillar
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:36 am
- Location: Sol sector.
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
The thing is i knew exactly what he and while i may have seemed aggressive.
It would only ever be with words.
Saying something and doing are two completely different things.
Converging psychologically to me is a horror near equal to eternal life.
and i dont understand this.
"With so many and frequent disasters, both natural and man-made, all over the world'
how did you come by that.?
There are no more "natural" such now than there ever was [less in fact]
Try a Krakatoa or a asteroid strike .. thats a disaster
i'll get pasted for this but i think is all a symptom of the pussyfication of our speacies.
i know a therapist who says kids are bought in that are so coddled and weak they cant hold a pen straight.. the parents
wont even let them play in the dirt cause of 'germs'
It would only ever be with words.
Saying something and doing are two completely different things.
Converging psychologically to me is a horror near equal to eternal life.
and i dont understand this.
"With so many and frequent disasters, both natural and man-made, all over the world'
how did you come by that.?
There are no more "natural" such now than there ever was [less in fact]
Try a Krakatoa or a asteroid strike .. thats a disaster
i'll get pasted for this but i think is all a symptom of the pussyfication of our speacies.
i know a therapist who says kids are bought in that are so coddled and weak they cant hold a pen straight.. the parents
wont even let them play in the dirt cause of 'germs'
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
News, mostly. Tsunamis, earthquakes, volcanoes, nuclear plants, tornadoes, ice-storms, hurricanes, oil spills, wildfires, floods, famines, wars - every couple of weeks, something, someplace is hurting people who don't deserve to be hurt. A lot of it is probably due to climate change, which is a collaboration of man and his nasty little vengeful gods, and that will only get worse.Hjarloprillar wrote: and i dont understand this.
"With so many and frequent disasters, both natural and man-made, all over the world'
how did you come by that.?
[paste] stop that![/paste] What've you got against pussy?i'll get pasted for this but i think is all a symptom of the pussyfication of our speacies.
Real men go around slashing each other with sharp implements - yeah! All women ever do is make food, raise kids, build shelters, bandage wounds, teach people to read...
Those are two temporary issues affecting part of a class that's about to die out anyway, so who cares?i know a therapist who says kids are bought in that are so coddled and weak they cant hold a pen straight.. the parents
wont even let them play in the dirt cause of 'germs'
- Hjarloprillar
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:36 am
- Location: Sol sector.
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
"Those are two temporary issues affecting part of a class that's about to die out anyway, so who cares?"
what i want to know is HOW 'they' will die out.
or will they become as it has always been. the ruling class.
pussy?
what i want to know is HOW 'they' will die out.
or will they become as it has always been. the ruling class.
pussy?
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
I'm not sure. Inbreeding, outbreeding, revolutions, the total breakdown of moneterism; extreme pussyfication, terminal technology; they all converge on the ultimate walled community on some sub-arctic island http://www.city-data.com/city/Akutan-Alaska.htmlhttp://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/al ... 03871.htmlthat only the very rich can get to... and it has a vulcano under it! Whatever: there are so few of them, it wouldn't take much.Hjarloprillar wrote: what i want to know is HOW 'they' will die out.
It's not the same genetic line. If it had been, we'd have cut off their heads before history started to be written, and history would be quite different. Trouble is, the same traits are on all of our DNA, and bits of it keep surfacing.or will they become as it has always been. the ruling class.
Are you asking or offering?pussy?
- Hjarloprillar
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:36 am
- Location: Sol sector.
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
Skip
if i was asking i'd hire a jet.
i have none to offer
if i was asking i'd hire a jet.
i have none to offer
- Hjarloprillar
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:36 am
- Location: Sol sector.
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
to re align with op
How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
i'd kill all who did not agree with me and grovel. the riddick who says
is not part of the plan
the plan were all are same. and in gory of god me bow.
so goes the psychosis of humanity
How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
i'd kill all who did not agree with me and grovel. the riddick who says
is not part of the plan
the plan were all are same. and in gory of god me bow.
so goes the psychosis of humanity
Re: How would you prefer to eliminate prejudice?
Well, that'll larn me to ask a silly6 question!