Epicureanism (hedonism) versus Stoicism

Should you think about your duty, or about the consequences of your actions? Or should you concentrate on becoming a good person?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
User avatar
The Voice of Time
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:18 pm
Location: Norway

Epicureanism (hedonism) versus Stoicism

Post by The Voice of Time »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2r1KaB1 ... SQ&index=8

3 minutes philosophy. Learned something new today, I didn't know (or remember) that Epicurus disliked desire, though I've probably heard it many times.
marjoramblues
Posts: 632
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:37 am

Re: Epicureanism (hedonism) versus Stoicism

Post by marjoramblues »

:lol:

'meh...pull your head outta yer arse...incredibly boring people...'
John K
Posts: 194
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:19 pm
Location: Gruithuisen's Lunar City.

Re: Epicureanism (hedonism) versus Stoicism

Post by John K »

The Voice of Time wrote: 3 minutes philosophy. Learned something new today, I didn't know (or remember) that Epicurus disliked desire, though I've probably heard it many times.
Sounds similar to the Four Truths of Buddhism. Epicurus was, I believe, interested in ethical hedonism, which served as a boundary to endlessly 'looking for more pleasure.' Thoughts brought back from Alexander's ventures to India, incorporated into Epicurus' philosophy? I think that's quite possible.
Ansiktsburk
Posts: 515
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:03 pm
Location: Central Scandinavia

Re: Epicureanism (hedonism) versus Stoicism

Post by Ansiktsburk »

But to find Epicureanism boring, you must hate yourself. Or you have misunderstood it all.
Post Reply