~ Evolution of God ~

[Arising_uk]

Like Bill you appear to think if you keep saying something that makes it true, it doesn't.

Your disabilities are clear to all in this forum.

[bobevenson]

Like Bill you appear to think if you keep saying something that makes it true, it doesn't.

Your disabilities are clear to all in this forum.

Maybe a few hands of Ouzo will sober you up. Oh, I forgot, you don't know how to play Ouzo.

[uwot]

Maybe a few hands of Ouzo will sober you up. Oh, I forgot, you don't know how to play Ouzo.

Be fair, Bob; no one knows how to play Ouzo.

[Bill Wiltrack]

.










................................................................









.

[mtmynd1]

As the human species grows in intellect, so too economics becomes antiquated, one day becoming a mere footnote in the human history books. As the only road to increased intelligence, leaves money, or anything remotely resembling it, by the wayside. You can jeer all you want, but mark my words, it'll actually be required for our continuance past a certain breaking point. It would seem you've chosen the path of the dinosaur, a hanger-on of a dying belief system, based upon inequality.

The 20th Century's ideal can be seen in a game that was created in that era, "Monopoly". That became symbolic of the ideal where the 'allocation of property' is/was viewed as the road to riches. Here in the 21st Century we can see a different mindset, one that is tired if not plainly suspicious of that "Monopoly Mindset" by observing what is going on all around us. The game is over, the winners hold all the money and the majority are simply playing the game without any chance of gaining any ground. Good for the winners, bad for everyone else. It is imperative that a new economic ideal is found that treats the majority fairly and equally.

[Bill Wiltrack]

.



Wow. GREAT post!


LOVE the way you used that metaphor.



Painfully true.



.

[bobevenson]

Maybe a few hands of Ouzo will sober you up. Oh, I forgot, you don't know how to play Ouzo.

Be fair, Bob; no one knows how to play Ouzo.

Well, I know how to play Ouzo, although I do admit it has never been played between two or more players before. Of course, that will change in the near future.

[Bill Wiltrack]

.









.....................................................................................................








.

[Arising_uk]

Be fair, Bob; no one knows how to play Ouzo.

And he can't even explain it.

[SpheresOfBalance]

As the human species grows in intellect, so too economics becomes antiquated, one day becoming a mere footnote in the human history books. As the only road to increased intelligence, leaves money, or anything remotely resembling it, by the wayside. You can jeer all you want, but mark my words, it'll actually be required for our continuance past a certain breaking point. It would seem you've chosen the path of the dinosaur, a hanger-on of a dying belief system, based upon inequality.

The 20th Century's ideal can be seen in a game that was created in that era, "Monopoly". That became symbolic of the ideal where the 'allocation of property' is/was viewed as the road to riches. Here in the 21st Century we can see a different mindset, one that is tired if not plainly suspicious of that "Monopoly Mindset" by observing what is going on all around us. The game is over, the winners hold all the money and the majority are simply playing the game without any chance of gaining any ground. Good for the winners, bad for everyone else. It is imperative that a new economic ideal is found that treats the majority fairly and equally.

Yes, but I would hope, they'd revise the word so as to not remind us of our failed past.

For instance, I like definition five from Dictionary.com Unabridged, Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2013, that states:

5. "the disposition or regulation of the parts or functions of any organic whole; an organized system or method."

But would like to see added verbiage such that it reads something like:

1. "the efficient disposition or regulation of all the equally important parts or functions of any organic whole; an efficient, organized system or method of equilibrium." And the word used to represent such, should of course, be altered to include such additions.

[bobevenson]

Be fair, Bob; no one knows how to play Ouzo.

And he can't even explain it.

HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!

THANKS FOR THE BIGGEST JOKE OF THE DAY!!!

[Arising_uk]

You know the Fraudians say a laugh is an expression of a subconscious truth to that person.

I think you mean, "MU-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!"

[bobevenson]

You know the Fraudians say a laugh is an expression of a subconscious truth to that person.

I think you mean, "MU-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!!!"

No, what's so funny is that you couldn't figure out the game after being coached by the Wizard of Ouzo, which means you are, indeed, a hopeless case, trying to figure out the easiest game in the world that even a toddler could figure out on his own!

[Arising_uk]

Having been a teacher and the experience of your 'coaching', I can tell how far you are from being a coach. Tell you what, you point me to someone you've taught them game and I'll ask them how to play it or more importantly, whats its point?
p.s.
I give you this tho', your monomania certainly succeeds in getting back to your pet topic as often as possible.

[bobevenson]

Tell you what, you point me to someone you've taught them game and I'll ask them how to play it or more importantly, whats its point?

I haven't taught anybody the game since it's fully explained in "The Ouzo Prophecy," except the doubling and redoubling of a bid, which, of course, has nothing to do with the allegorical nature of the game itself.