bobevenson wrote:You have demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a prime example of, and truly represent, oppressive European thinking, where government trumps human rights!
Its that we invented Govt to safeguard human rights against the self-interested powerful thats the point boob.
Your 'human rights' appears to consist of nothing but your right to enslave others for profit.
Arising_uk wrote:Your right to enslave others for profit.
Spoken like a true socialist or communist, take your pick.
British Liberal, and I don't mean in the Yanks political sense.
That you think its fine to kidnap girls to sell for sex as its just business places you firmly.
You really should think about how you may be the 'Baptist' buts its the 'Anti-Baptist', you're batting for the other side. But I guess you may actually know this.
Just admit it, you're against profits, you're like so many socialists who try to attack capitalism by attacking other issues, but it's profits you're really against.
Why would I? As its untrue. What I'm against is profits made from slavery but since you're a Yank I guess you think this an infringement upon your personal human rights.
Arising_uk wrote:Why would I? As its untrue. What I'm against is profits made from slavery but since you're a Yank I guess you think this an infringement upon your personal human rights.
You think the absence of a minimum wage is slavery, which means you don't know anything about slavery at all!
You don't know what slavery is if you think the inability of the British government to control crime is a reason to ban sex-trafficking, entrepreneurs trying to satisfy customer demand, which the British government has no interest in seeing accomplished due to its inability to control crime and other nefarious reasons.
bobevenson wrote:You don't know what slavery is if you think the inability of the British government to control crime is a reason to ban sex-trafficking, entrepreneurs trying to satisfy customer demand, which the British government has no interest in seeing accomplished due to its inability to control crime and other nefarious reasons.
"entrepreneurs" a word your President said the French have no word for, American edumecasion writ large.
That you call them entrepreneurs rather than kidnappers and slavers shows your qualities.
bobevenson wrote:You don't know what slavery is if you think the inability of the British government to control crime is a reason to ban sex-trafficking, entrepreneurs trying to satisfy customer demand, which the British government has no interest in seeing accomplished due to its inability to control crime and other nefarious reasons.
"entrepreneurs" a word your President said the French have no word for, American edumecasion writ large.
That you call them entrepreneurs rather than kidnappers and slavers shows your qualities.
If sex trafficking were legal, it would not lead to kidnapping and slavery, just as if drug trafficking were legal, it would not lead to mayhem and murder.
bobevenson wrote:You don't know what slavery is if you think the inability of the British government to control crime is a reason to ban sex-trafficking, entrepreneurs trying to satisfy customer demand, which the British government has no interest in seeing accomplished due to its inability to control crime and other nefarious reasons.
"entrepreneurs" a word your President said the French have no word for, American edumecasion writ large.
That you call them entrepreneurs rather than kidnappers and slavers shows your qualities.
If sex trafficking were legal, it would not lead to kidnapping and slavery, just as if drug trafficking were legal, it would not lead to mayhem and murder.
Bob are you trying to say that you are unaware of the meaning of the phrase "sex trafficking?" At wikipedia you'll find that it redirects to 'human trafficking' which is the trade of humans, as in slavery, for various purposes, including forced labor and sex.
I'm talking about sex-trafficking in the same sense as drug-trafficking, providing sex or drugs to people willing to pay an agreed-upon price. I am not talking about breaking any laws other than selling sex and drugs, which would and should be perfectly legal in a free society that can only be identified with the American Energy Party (AEP).
Its that we invented Govt to safeguard human rights against the self-interested powerful thats the point boob.
