Arising_uk wrote:Do you take an oath in civil jobs?
Fuck your oaths, oaths don't mean shit in a free society, my friend!
Arising_uk wrote:Do you take an oath in civil jobs?
bobevenson wrote:Fuck your oaths, oaths don't mean shit in a free society, my friend!
As an inhabitant of England and Europe, you know nothing about a free society or what it's based on.Arising_uk wrote:bobevenson wrote:Fuck your oaths, oaths don't mean shit in a free society, my friend!I'd have thought keeping ones oath or word is a prerequisite in a free society?
bobevenson wrote:As an inhabitant of England and Europe, you know nothing about a free society or what it's based on.
You have 800 years of using the Magna Carta for toilet paper.Arising_uk wrote:We have 800 years experience of what its based on.
Of course we do boob.bobevenson wrote:You have 800 years of using the Magna Carta for toilet paper.
Well, I'm glad we agree on something.Arising_uk wrote:Of course we do boob.bobevenson wrote:You have 800 years of using the Magna Carta for toilet paper.
You mean like how you change subject to insults whenever asked about what you actually mean?bobevenson wrote:Oh, now you want to change your story again, like you always do when you're in an untenable position!
People who use multiple emoticons as a substitute for logic don't deserve a reply.Arising_uk wrote:You mean like how you change subject to insults whenever asked about what you actually mean?bobevenson wrote:Oh, now you want to change your story again, like you always do when you're in an untenable position!
Didn't you see the
in the post that you edited in your reply? If not, this is what I mean by your selective and confirmational delusions.
See the logical problem above?bobevenson wrote:People who use multiple emoticons as a substitute for logic don't deserve a reply.Arising_uk wrote:You mean like how you change subject to insults whenever asked about what you actually mean?bobevenson wrote:Oh, now you want to change your story again, like you always do when you're in an untenable position!
Didn't you see the
in the post that you edited in your reply? If not, this is what I mean by your selective and confirmational delusions.
The logical problem is that you substitute emoticons for thinking.Arising_uk wrote:See the logical problem above?
So thats a no then. No surprise there.bobevenson wrote:The logical problem is that you substitute emoticons for thinking.
Then you must be a woman, transsexual or gay, which explains why you refuse to state your gender. Do you also have hot flashes? And anyway, who the hell cares what emotion you're feeling at the time. Why do you have to tell us about it? Tell it to your shrink!Arising_uk wrote:So thats a no then. No surprise there.bobevenson wrote:The logical problem is that you substitute emoticons for thinking.
No, I use them to indicate the emotion I'm having at the time, the clue is in the name.