Bill Wiltrack wrote:There is a finger and a moon that you'd be able to understand.
No answer to questions as usual.
Bill Wiltrack wrote:There is a finger and a moon that you'd be able to understand.
Bill Wiltrack wrote:If you find that I repeat something that I told you, it's because I don't think you listened the first time - or perhaps the second time.
Very well; what does your intellect say about the goal of philosophy?Bill Wiltrack wrote:We need the intellect; the finger, to focus upon the goal of philosophy but the finger is not the goal.
Indeed. One which you say shows us what the goal of philosophy is and is then to be dispensed with.Bill Wiltrack wrote:The finger is a tool.
Oh, it's a possible relationship to art. Well, anything's possible.Bill Wiltrack wrote:As far as my characterization of an individual's possible relationship to art, I stand with every word I stated.
It is. Who are the other philosophers that confirm that your experience is sufficiently characteristic of actual artists to merit posting on a philosophy forum? If you want to share your autobiography, find a medium that is suited to that purpose.Bill Wiltrack wrote:I base that upon my individual experience and then later, through other philosophers, I was able to better understand what I went through.
Your experience may be different.
And having checked I can confirm that you haven't given me enough information, hence the questions.Bill Wiltrack wrote:Not sure if I gave you enough information to understand my position. May want to check yourself...


