Well, let's see, you agree that the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba is wrong, but you don't think embargoes in general are crimes against humanity. Apparently, you don't think human suffering brought on by embargoes is a crime. I guess that's a philosophical position that one can take without explanation.
rantal wrote:What of the embargo against the evil appareled regime in South Africa? Your statement is too general
all the best, rantal
First of all, embargoes rarely, if ever, accomplish their objectives (viz. U.S. 40 year embargo of Cuba), and in all cases harm innocent civilians, so my statement that embargoes are crimes against humanity stands for always and forever.
rantal wrote:What of the embargo against the evil appareled regime in South Africa? Your statement is too general
all the best, rantal
First of all, embargoes rarely, if ever, accomplish their objectives (viz. U.S. 40 year embargo of Cuba), and in all cases harm innocent civilians, so my statement that embargoes are crimes against humanity stands for always and forever.
Saying the rarely succed is to ignore that they worked in South Africa, therefore your claim is false
rantal wrote:What of the embargo against the evil appareled regime in South Africa? Your statement is too general
all the best, rantal
First of all, embargoes rarely, if ever, accomplish their objectives (viz. U.S. 40 year embargo of Cuba), and in all cases harm innocent civilians, so my statement that embargoes are crimes against humanity stands for always and forever.
Saying the rarely succed is to ignore that they worked in South Africa, therefore your claim is false
all the best, rantal
Rarely is not the same as never, fool, and innocent people are always harmed!