You do talk a lot of bollocks. The poverty of historicism is not a case for "the end of history", but the reckless nonsense that says we can predict the pathway of history. Popper is not saying that history is at en end, only twat like Fukwad would say that, Popper is aware that history continues, in unpredictable ways. Fukwad's "end of.." is the worst type of historicism and would have slated Fukwad had he still lived.
It appears by this rant and butchering up of an idea that history has not been kind to the writer.
On the contrary. I just know more about it than you do evidently.