Why Are Republicans Forced to Look Like Morons?

[bobevenson]

I'll let Felasco answer for himself.

[Felasco]

he doesn't even realize you were poking fun at his abysmal command of the English language.

I wouldn't not even never done did such a thing, as I didn't wanna be look moron!

[Bill Wiltrack]

.


I appreciate both of you responding to your core.


This thread is still open to anyone who would like to actually address the contents of this specific thread.





.

[bobevenson]

When you say "responding to your core," do you mean like a heater core in an automobile, or do you mean like a military corps of some kind? Also, you might want to go over the contents of this thread, preferably with a few well-chosen words in a condensed format not surrounded by an acre of totally empty space.

[Felasco]

This thread is still open to anyone who would like to actually address the contents of this specific thread.

I


think



white




space




is





good!

[Bill Wiltrack]

.







...........................................................






......................................................................................................................


..............................................................................IF YOU DON'T GET IT, ASK AN AMERICAN WHO DOES.






.

[bobevenson]

The above acre of space that says absolutely nothing is presented by Bill Wiltrack, who in his own mind seems to consider it a public service announcement.

[Kayla]

http://www.heckler-koch.com/en/military ... ifles.html

an arms manufacturer seems to think that there is such a thing as assault rifles

[chaz wyman]

.

This is pretty good: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

It is a pleasure to introduce you to Wikipedia! The fountain of all knowledge.


You're going to like the internet.

.

Were you drunk when you wrote this?

[bobevenson]

.

This is pretty good: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle

It is a pleasure to introduce you to Wikipedia! The fountain of all knowledge.


You're going to like the internet.

.

Were you drunk when you wrote this?

He wasn't drunk, he's just nuts (the kind you wouldn't sell a gun to), always has been and always will be!

[chaz wyman]

.



Why Are Republicans Forced to Look Morons?




Lately the Republican Party has been saddled with owning and promoting the WORST answers to the important questions that face America and patriotic Americans today.



The latest is the issue of guns.



.

Laws against guns in civilised countries are enacted so that the police can put a person in gaol for the intent to commit a crime. The carrying of any weapon is an implicit intention to do that. Law abiding citizens have not enacted that law to restrict themselves - they have no need of guns or other weapons, as we can change the law through the democratic process - a thing which for all your talk is too remote for an American to see as a reality.
No, laws restricting weapons, are their to protect law abiding citizens from idiots like you.
And it works.
The British have never needed weapons to protect themselves from government, as we are civilised enough to listen to the people. The US have followed every democratic reform and improvement of significance that has been pioneered by British political thinkers, and is still behind most civilised thinking.

British have always had the gumption to struggle against their leaders. Political dissent is far more advanced in the UK than it has ever been in the US, with one exception. When the British made the US, they were following the long tradition of political struggle against authority. This is a lesson that British people have never forgotten.

The political landscape of the UK os more diverse and representative than it is in the USA. The USA has forgotten the roots of its political beginnings and many there still feel the need to keep a gun, in the misconceived notion that to have a gun will enhance their political clout in some way. This is the height of absurdity. Not only have they lost the plot when it comes to their childish macho ideology, they have missed the point of 'revolution', as a process of change and have attached themselves with an act of Faith to a moribund and ossified Constitution which was out of date 200 years ago. They have also missed the subtlety of the definition of the word "amendment".

"Like, um we caint change da constitution coz of da 2nd. amendment."

Amendments are made to avoid a constitution becoming irrelevant, to ensure that a constitution can continue to be responsive to the needs of the people. THAT IS WHY IT IS CALLED AN AMENDMENT.

When armed revolution is called for, no one ever has any trouble to get hold of the weapons they need. This is a historical fact. In a democracy or in a country with aspirations of democracy guns are not useful; people power is. There are numerous examples of unarmed struggles leading to self determination and democracy, whilst armed struggles do not have the same level of success. The USA was not even one of them. The so-called revolution did not lead to democracy, but to a Oligarchy, for a further 100+ years, when the plebiscite extended to more than 5% of the population. In France it lead to a Monarchical backlash; Vietnam - tyranny; China - tyranny. Spain - Dictatorship, any other examples????

The notion that any armed struggle could establish democracy is a grand fallacy, and the lie beneath the gun lobby's ideological nonsense. Accepted by fools whose use of a long metal object is used as some sort of compensation.

[bobevenson]

Does England have a Bill of Rights or even a Constitution? I know it has a King and Queen and a bunch of goddamn elves called subjects.

[Kayla]

chaz what is with all the surveillance cameras in the uk - that is uber creepy - 1984 was political commentary not a 'how to' manual

[bobevenson]

chaz what is with all the surveillance cameras in the uk - that is uber creepy - 1984 was political commentary not a 'how to' manual

Chaz doesn't worry about surveillance cameras since without guns he knows the King's subjects can't topple an oppressive government anyway.

[artisticsolution]

"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,"

Wayne LaPierre, (NRA's executive vice president)

Really? Are you sure that's is the ONLY thing? What about first at least making it harder for the "bad" guy to get a gun...or more like making it a little harder for the mentally ill to own a gun...esp. an assault rifle. How about making some consequences for gun owners as well...as it appears some of them have more false bravdo than brains.

Seriously, you have to take a test to drive a car...but any idiot can own a gun. Why not make people who own guns more responsible for the damage they cause...esp...due to stupidity.

I am an awful driver...and if I accidentally killed someone with my car....there are laws that would see I went to jail if I am negligent. How about making it the same for gun owners. Let a minor use your gun and he kills himself or someone else...you go to jail. How about making people , who want to own a gun, have to attend school and take a written and practical test too? What is wrong with that?

Look....I am not going to have a moronic (good choice of words Bill) discussion on whether or not there should be a ban on assault weapons...and what constitutes an assault weapon. If you believe there should NOT be a ban on assault weapons and you also would draw the line on just anyone being able to own their own nukes or cannons or missiles, etc....then you ARE (obviously) for some kind of ban on weapons...hell...you might even be a 'liberal'. And if you think anyone should be able to own nukes etc. because after all..."we live in a 'free' country" then you are a moron.

Hi Bill...I for one and glad you are back but I am not quite sure you left in the first place.