Being Human

[SecularCauses]

Fucking Dah! This is not an issue about "precision" in language.
As the poster is drawing a distinction between one sort of person and another, denying them their humanity whilst bestowing it on themselves, I thought with your obsession about (non-existent) anti-semitism, that you would offer your support against a person that thinks some people are less than human.
Am I going too fast for you?

The more you write the more stupid you appear.

The argument you trailer trash assclowns use, "define this... define that...," is just a lame-ass one. You can understand what is being said, and you can keep asking a person to define something as nauseum, but it adds nothing of substance. I'm just exposing one of the more overused weak arguments people like you make.

Have you gone up to an economics professor yet with your theory of how the Jews run the US economy? Have you gotten your theory published yet in a reputable econ journal? I wish I could be there as you go up to a professor at explain your neo-nai crap to him/her. Just to see the expression on the professor's face asit dawns on him/her that you are a complete whackjob just standing feet away would be priceless.

So, tell me then if, in this case, it is such a stupid argument, then where do you stand on who gets to be called human and who does not? Do you think religious people are inhuman, unhuman, subhuman, pseudohuman?

I don't consider Jew-hating fascist fucks like you to be human. Putting a bullet through your brain is no more troublesome to me than stepping on a cockroach.

[chaz wyman]

The argument you trailer trash assclowns use,

Sorry - I did not realise that you were a classist snob. We already know you to be a misogynist. Are you a racist too?

"define this... define that...," is just a lame-ass one. You can understand what is being said, and you can keep asking a person to define something as nauseum, but it adds nothing of substance. I'm just exposing one of the more overused weak arguments people like you make.

Have you gone up to an economics professor yet with your theory of how the Jews run the US economy? Have you gotten your theory published yet in a reputable econ journal? I wish I could be there as you go up to a professor at explain your neo-nai crap to him/her. Just to see the expression on the professor's face asit dawns on him/her that you are a complete whackjob just standing feet away would be priceless.[/color]

So, tell me then if, in this case, it is such a stupid argument, then where do you stand on who gets to be called human and who does not? Do you think religious people are inhuman, unhuman, subhuman, pseudohuman?

I don't consider Jew-hating fascist fucks like you to be human. Putting a bullet through your brain is no more troublesome to me than stepping on a cockroach.

The thing about this website is that its called "Philosophy Now". Philosophy is about asking and answering questions.
Did you miss the question? Shall I repeat it?
The poster thinks religious people are not human.
So, tell me then if, in this case, it is such a stupid argument, then where do you stand on who gets to be called human and who does not? Do you think religious people are inhuman, unhuman, subhuman, pseudo-human?

Shall I try to ask you an easier one?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

@Chaz Sigh. Clearly we are all the same species physically, with the same DNA. The point I was trying to make is that an advanced alien species would define us by what HUMANITY has learned, by what HUMANITY understands. That is how they would judge us as a species. This is why I said that denying what our species has learned is denying one's humanity. I thought my original post was pretty obvious.

[reasonvemotion]

Veg wrote:

Creationists cannot, in all honesty, claim the title of 'human'.

This is why I said that denying what our species has learned is denying one's humanity.

I am at a loss.

[chaz wyman]

@Chaz Sigh. Clearly we are all the same species physically, with the same DNA. The point I was trying to make is that an advanced alien species would define us by what HUMANITY has learned, by what HUMANITY understands. That is how they would judge us as a species. This is why I said that denying what our species has learned is denying one's humanity. I thought my original post was pretty obvious.

First, what you actually said was the people who were religious were not human.
Do you now withdraw that statement?

Secondly you have not got a clue what an alien species might think about us. They might come here to convert us to some idiotic Space God for all you know.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

@Chaz Sigh. Clearly we are all the same species physically, with the same DNA. The point I was trying to make is that an advanced alien species would define us by what HUMANITY has learned, by what HUMANITY understands. That is how they would judge us as a species. This is why I said that denying what our species has learned is denying one's humanity. I thought my original post was pretty obvious.

First, what you actually said was the people who were religious were not human.
Do you now withdraw that statement?

Secondly you have not got a clue what an alien species might think about us. They might come here to convert us to some idiotic Space God for all you know.

Are you really as stupid as you appear to be? They might also be pink jelly babies who want us all to worship sugar!

[SecularCauses]

@Chaz Sigh. Clearly we are all the same species physically, with the same DNA. The point I was trying to make is that an advanced alien species would define us by what HUMANITY has learned, by what HUMANITY understands. That is how they would judge us as a species. This is why I said that denying what our species has learned is denying one's humanity. I thought my original post was pretty obvious.

First, what you actually said was the people who were religious were not human.
Do you now withdraw that statement?

Secondly you have not got a clue what an alien species might think about us. They might come here to convert us to some idiotic Space God for all you know.

Are you really as stupid as you appear to be? They might also be pink jelly babies who want us all to worship sugar!

If they ever pick up someone as dumb as chaz to do an anal probe on, then we are doomed.

[chaz wyman]

@Chaz Sigh. Clearly we are all the same species physically, with the same DNA. The point I was trying to make is that an advanced alien species would define us by what HUMANITY has learned, by what HUMANITY understands. That is how they would judge us as a species. This is why I said that denying what our species has learned is denying one's humanity. I thought my original post was pretty obvious.

First, what you actually said was the people who were religious were not human.
Do you now withdraw that statement?

Secondly you have not got a clue what an alien species might think about us. They might come here to convert us to some idiotic Space God for all you know.

They might also be pink jelly babies who want us all to worship sugar!

Obviously.
But why are you avoiding the question?
"...what you actually said was the people who were religious were not human.
Do you now withdraw that statement?"

[vegetariantaxidermy]

I'm not withdrawing anything I wrote. Better phone the police then.

[chaz wyman]

I'm not withdrawing anything I wrote. Better phone the police then.

There is nothing to stop you saying that religious people are not human.
But obviously that would depend what you mean by human, wouldn't it?
Just so we all know where we stand.
Are they subhuman, or would you say inhuman?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

You don't even understand the thread so how can I argue with you about it??? Make your own mind up about what I think then. Who cares?

[chaz wyman]

You don't even understand the thread so how can I argue with you about it??? Make your own mind up about what I think then. Who cares?

Do you know what is meant by the term 'human'?

Obviously you think some humans are less worthy than you.
We know you are friends with SecularCauses, and he seems to support your view.
He tends to use classes based epithets such as 'trailer trash'. Do you think 'trailer trash' are also subhuman?
What about blacks? Or is it just the poor/religious ones that do not qualify as human?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

You don't even understand the thread so how can I argue with you about it??? Make your own mind up about what I think then. Who cares?

Do you know what is meant by the term 'human'?

Obviously you think some humans are less worthy than you.
We know you are friends with SecularCauses, and he seems to support your view.
He tends to use classes based epithets such as 'trailer trash'. Do you think 'trailer trash' are also subhuman?
What about blacks? Or is it just the poor/religious ones that do not qualify as human?

As long as you keep putting words in my mouth I won't respond. Cheerio then. You also know nothing about me.

[chaz wyman]

You don't even understand the thread so how can I argue with you about it??? Make your own mind up about what I think then. Who cares?

Do you know what is meant by the term 'human'?

Obviously you think some humans are less worthy than you.
We know you are friends with SecularCauses, and he seems to support your view.
He tends to use classes based epithets such as 'trailer trash'. Do you think 'trailer trash' are also subhuman?
What about blacks? Or is it just the poor/religious ones that do not qualify as human?

As long as you keep putting words in my mouth I won't respond. Cheerio then. You also know nothing about me.

I'm only asking.
But it is a fact that you seem to draw a distinction between humans and the religious.
It's a pity you do not want to distance yourself that that claim.

[SecularCauses]

I'm only asking.
But it is a fact that you seem to draw a distinction between humans and the religious.
It's a pity you do not want to distance yourself that that claim.

The pot sure is calling the kettle black. You claim Jews are not human.