Misogyny

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

Satyr wrote:Presumably being overpowered mentally is also not the same as being overpowered physically.
Ha, you caught that Satyr. I am trying to demonstrate the selective reasoning of these Judeo-Christians, in words they'll understand. I want to hold a mirror to them, and show them their hypocrisy, but their minds, brains, and eyes keep averting from these words. They know, instinctively, the direction of this road. They know their own lies, and fear the lies they've built their lives upon. They've put years, decades, entire generations and genetic lineages. They've put thousands of years into these lies and institutions.

Did you catch wotwot? Do you see how these Judeo-Christians value the sexuality of females, only, call this good and call it love, but the sexuality of males, is "hateful" and "evil". Watch cheeze wineman, watch his responses. This Jew hates himself, as a man, because he has been educated from birth, to hate his own sexuality. I want to watch him turn, and writhe, and twist, away from truth. I want to shine the light in his eyes.
Satyr wrote:Ironic how sex is wonderful when the women spreads her legs willingly, and a total abomination when she does not.

Ironic how being penetrated is something that comes easy in nature....you know allowing a foreign body into your own is no intrusion at all.
Yes, and these humanists call this intrusion her "choice". They don't connect the dots, and go further. They don't imagine the fear a female must endure, and overcome, to be fucked for the first time in her adolescence. As long as she "chooses" this submission before she experiences it, then it is justified to the Judeo-Christian institution.
She must take a risk, she must gamble her sexuality, before she has this thing humanists call "choice" or "human rights".
Satyr wrote:Ironic how nature has to develop a mechanism by which the individual is less intolerant of a bigger more powerful presence next to her, beside her, inside her...one which is less aggressive, smaller and easily overpowered - a specialized type which also possesses the physical AND mental attributes necessary for her to carry out her biological role.
Otherwise, why the fuck have a male and a female? Is God a hedonist?
The Jewish variant of humanism, stresses and emphasizes female sexual hedonism.
If a condom is used, or contraception, or abortion, then sex is "good" and enlightening. It is to be promoted, freely, with a woman's consent of course. The next step of feminism and Judaism, is male contraception, and male birth control. After all, why is it the woman's responsibility to have hedonistic sex, sex with condoms?
Shouldn't males automatically make ourselves impotent, no real consequences of sex, from the onset? This is an extension of the hypocrisy of Judeo-Christianity.
Sex is good, as long as no birth occurs. They call this "humane". I call it, dehumanizing. Males are presumed evil, from the premise.
Satyr wrote:Ironic how she also has to be overwhelmed by hormones to give-in and how in more sophisticated species she has to be overcome by an emotional cocktail, numbing her better judgments and silencing her fight/flight mechanism.
Ironic how even her body has to be tricked to accept the alien sperm before her autoimmune system kills them off....and ironic how this does not always work.

Ironic how in nature rape is a choice....a method
So much so that females have to submit to a strong dominant male so as to prevent constant male abuse.
This strong dominant male is "God", to the secular humanists. The Judeo-Christian morality reigns supreme. Jews especially, are given moral authority and credence, representation, as to what is socially and culturally "acceptable" action, behavior, and legal regarding overall human sexuality.
After all, this is nothing more than the civilized extension of population control. Whereas the Catholics strictly controlled European sexuality for millenniums in Europe, the Jews and humanists aim to control sexuality in America for ages to come. This results in hedonism and feminism as it appears. All female power, no male power.
Femininity is automatically good, masculinity is automatically evil.

This is the end result, the logical conclusion, of Judeo-Christian human secularism, as an ideology and central power of western civilization. All males, all penises, are born "evil". This is how this shit, this genetic feces, all these "thinkers" on this forum, actually think. They actually believe this shit.
Satyr wrote:Ironic how she must give-in by servicing the alpha male, enabling her to then sample the genetic wares available to her. Her "choice" in essence is made possible by her acquiescence to a powerful masculine entity...in modern times this is called an institution.
Only IT gets to exploit her...offering her the option of playing with the boys carefree under his watchful protection.

Ironic how only female choice matters.
Yes, she demands the lower males to wear condoms, birth control, contraception, and abortion is another tool of Judeo-Christianity. Sex is acceptable, and encouraged, as long as the beta males do not reproduce. This is another, inverted form of culling. It is an educational emasculation and destruction of western male virility.
It targets different men, of different racial and ethnic background, to the benefit of Judeo-Christian morality, and to the detriment of all types, men and women, who would go against this secular humanist ideology.

None may reproduce, none may have sex except for pleasure, except with condoms, until one submits the logical premises, voicing and repeating the lies, oaths, doctrines, and general secularist morality. Only then are the genetic feces "allowed" to reproduce a new generation of feces. Only after submitting to their new form of "god".
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

The Judeo-Christian religion, the secular humanist ideology, forces all women under its label to "choose" to have sex, before knowing the consequences of this choice, and before knowing the reality of this choice as it is learned and experienced first hand. In this forcefulness, what any rational and free thinker would see immediately as slavery, girls who are born into this Judeo-Christian filth, this rotten dogma, sick disgusting evil, are shamed before, during, and after losing virginity and made guilty of sin.

Jews and Christians force their daughters to make a "choice" about sex, before learning any of its lessons, and knowing any of its consequences. The result is, these genetic feces, these "modern empowered women", have views on sexuality as far away from reality as can be possible. Contraceptives serve to further this absurd abstraction of human sexuality and gender identity.
SecularCauses
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:06 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by SecularCauses »

Atthet wrote:The Judeo-Christian religion, the secular humanist ideology, forces all women under its label to "choose" to have sex, before knowing the consequences of this choice, and before knowing the reality of this choice as it is learned and experienced first hand. In this forcefulness, what any rational and free thinker would see immediately as slavery, girls who are born into this Judeo-Christian filth, this rotten dogma, sick disgusting evil, are shamed before, during, and after losing virginity and made guilty of sin.

Jews and Christians force their daughters to make a "choice" about sex, before learning any of its lessons, and knowing any of its consequences. The result is, these genetic feces, these "modern empowered women", have views on sexuality as far away from reality as can be possible. Contraceptives serve to further this absurd abstraction of human sexuality and gender identity.
Look, we all know life is tough on you 40-plus-year-old virgins. There just isn't a manual for you guys to buy to figure out how to get laid. But please do us all a favor and quit pretending you are an expert on the female anatomy. Blow-up dolls is more in line with your field of expertise.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

SecularCauses wrote:Look, we all know life is tough on you 40-plus-year-old virgins. There just isn't a manual for you guys to buy to figure out how to get laid. But please do us all a favor and quit pretending you are an expert on the female anatomy. Blow-up dolls is more in line with your field of expertise.
You aren't fooling anybody, ForgedinFarts. You're too obvious. Why did you change your username, foggy?
SecularCauses
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:06 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by SecularCauses »

Atthet wrote:
SecularCauses wrote:Look, we all know life is tough on you 40-plus-year-old virgins. There just isn't a manual for you guys to buy to figure out how to get laid. But please do us all a favor and quit pretending you are an expert on the female anatomy. Blow-up dolls is more in line with your field of expertise.
You aren't fooling anybody, ForgedinFarts. You're too obvious. Why did you change your username, foggy?
Is that the best you can do? Talk about an admission. You may as well go hang out with the elderly virgin crowd. Only real men need frequent this philosophy forum. Please feel free to take the rest of the assorted closet virgins with you. Maybe you can hold a lottery and see which two of you can meet up and lose your virginity?
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

SecularCauses wrote:Is that the best you can do? Talk about an admission. You may as well go hang out with the elderly virgin crowd. Only real men need frequent this philosophy forum. Please feel free to take the rest of the assorted closet virgins with you. Maybe you can hold a lottery and see which two of you can meet up and lose your virginity?
Are you going to offer $1000 to beat me up, next? Too easy, foggy, too easy, try again.
You need to learn to control your hate.
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by uwot »

Hi Satyr and Atthet
Satyr wrote:
Atthet wrote:
uwot wrote:being seduced has a choice
How is seducing somebody giving them a choice?
Presumably being overpowered mentally is also not the same as being overpowered physically.
No it isn't. Imagine: Satyr is walking down the road, he sees Atthet.
"Hello Atthet," says Satyr, "suck my dick."
Normally Atthet would be gobbling away in an instant, but today he doesn't feel like it. Satyr turns on the charm:
"Go on, I'll give you a lollipop."
Atthet is seduced.

There, that wasn't so terrible. However, next day Atthet isn't persuaded by the lollipop so Satyr holds a knife to his throat:
"Suck my dick, bitch!"
Atthet, fearing for his life, does as he is told.

Of course, it is possible that you two are so mental you genuinely can't tell the difference. Another possibility is that you are so fucked up that the idea of a woman trying to seduce is as terrifying as someone threatening to cut your throat. Either way you are pathetic.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

uwot wrote:Either way you are pathetic.
It seems more pathetic, to me, to whine and bitch and beg for sex from women, like you do wotwot.
I put the value of man above woman, does this scare you? Does it scare you that women should be asking for men's consent for sex, not the other way around?
It scares the genetic feces out of you Judeo-Christian scum. Go pray to God like a good, faithful servant, wotwot.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

Everybody should note, that wowow, being the typical coward that he is, like others on this forum, including allemotion noreason, is avoiding answering my question. I asked him to tell me how seducing somebody is giving them a choice. He cannot answer this question.
It would ruin his blind faith, his dogma, his ignorance is bliss. He doesn't want to let go of his Christian God. He holds it tightly in his heart. He's devoted an entire lifetime to this lie. He's not about to let go of it now.

He has been seduced. His "choice" was stripped away from him, out of his hands, probably as a child. He was probably baptized as an infant.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

We should all note here, now, that to this Judeo-Christian genetic feces, this scum of the earth, that being seduced means "being given a choice".
In other words, if you submit to God, and their secular humanist faith, then you are given a choice after you submit. After you, apparently, give up your choice, your freedom, you are given it back again?

It's complete nonsense. Only stunted minds, retards or children, could believe in this complete lapse of reason and logical consistency.

You are seduced. And then, after you are seduced, you are given a choice, somehow? Let's see if this genetic fece will address his brain fart.
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by uwot »

Hi Atthet
Atthet wrote:Everybody should note, that wowow, being the typical coward that he is, like others on this forum, including allemotion noreason, is avoiding answering my question. I asked him to tell me how seducing somebody is giving them a choice. He cannot answer this question.
When Satyr offers you a lollipop, you can say no.
Atthet wrote:It would ruin his blind faith, his dogma, his ignorance is bliss. He doesn't want to let go of his Christian God. He holds it tightly in his heart. He's devoted an entire lifetime to this lie. He's not about to let go of it now.
You're making things up to confirm your delusions, just like Satyr.
Atthet wrote:He has been seduced. His "choice" was stripped away from him, out of his hands, probably as a child. He was probably baptized as an infant.
You're doing it again.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

Wowwow,
Why are you on a philosophy forum if you refuse to answer or acknowledge questions from a real, true philosopher?
Why do I ask you questions, when I know you won't answer them, because you're a coward?
Why is being seduced, offering the one being seduced, a "choice"?
Can you explain this?
Or, will you continue to dodge all questions, like the coward fuck genetic fece that you and your kind, are, forever were and will be for thousands of years to come?
Why should anything more be expected from a slave like you, who is slave to a dogma she really doesn't comprehend, but accepts anyway?
User avatar
vegetariantaxidermy
Posts: 13975
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
Location: Narniabiznus

Re: Misogyny

Post by vegetariantaxidermy »

Atthet wrote:Wowwow,
Why are you on a philosophy forum if you refuse to answer or acknowledge questions from a real, true philosopher?
Why do I ask you questions, when I know you won't answer them, because you're a coward?
Why is being seduced, offering the one being seduced, a "choice"?
Can you explain this?
Or, will you continue to dodge all questions, like the coward fuck genetic fece that you and your kind, are, forever were and will be for thousands of years to come?
Why should anything more be expected from a slave like you, who is slave to a dogma she really doesn't comprehend, but accepts anyway?
What makes you think you aren't a 'genetic fece' (whatever that is)?
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by uwot »

Atthet wrote:Wowwow,
Why are you on a philosophy forum if you refuse to answer or acknowledge questions from a real, true philosopher?
You are not a real, true philosopher; like Satyr, you are a fucking idiot.
Atthet wrote:Why do I ask you questions, when I know you won't answer them, because you're a coward?
I did answer the question, but like Satyr, you don't recognise answers that don't confirm your ridiculous fantasies.
Atthet wrote:Why is being seduced, offering the one being seduced, a "choice"?
Can you explain this?
Yes I can. When somebody tries to seduce you, you can say no. If you say yes it is either because you believe that what is being offered will be agreeable, or you are a pathetic retard who is too frightened to say no.
Atthet wrote:Or, will you continue to dodge all questions, like the coward fuck genetic fece that you and your kind, are, forever were and will be for thousands of years to come?
Why should anything more be expected from a slave like you, who is slave to a dogma she really doesn't comprehend, but accepts anyway?
I can give you the answers; I cannot give you the cerebral capacity to appreciate them.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

uwot wrote:When somebody tries to seduce you, you can say no.
No, if the seduction is effective, then the person being seduced will not realize he or she is being seduced. You moron? A successful seduction is undetectable, and does not give the one being seduced a choice, you turd?
Post Reply