Misogyny

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:I'm not delicate. I'm a big, butch, steroid-pumped shot-putter from Georgia. :mrgreen:
I'm going to lift you over my head, drop you on the ground, gently, pin you completely immobile, kiss you passionately, and then invade your privacy like has been never invaded before. You're going to scream out pleasure so loud, that the angels will hear your ecstasy. You're my clay, to mold as I see fit. You're nothing, to my strength.
You can call this "hate", if it makes you feel better, and sleep easier, even while you're covered in the sweat and sticky juices of our passion, bound together.
mickthinks
Posts: 1816
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
Location: Augsburg

Re: Misogyny

Post by mickthinks »

So you see yourself as a rapist. That's hatred, clear and simple.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Arising_uk »

Atthet wrote:... to grope your delicate body, .... Does that sound like "hate" to you? ...
Nope, it sounds pervy.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

Are you genetic feces saying, that if a man overpowers and has sex with a woman, then he is evil and expressing hatred, but if a woman seduces a man, then she is good and expressing love?

So you're saying that the female's sexuality is inherently good and loving, and that the male's sexuality is inherently evil and hating? I may agree with you genetic feces. This is how you Jews and Christians view human sexuality. A man's sexuality is hateful. A woman's sexuality is loving and caring.
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: Misogyny

Post by chaz wyman »

Atthet wrote:Are you genetic feces saying, that if a man overpowers and has sex with a woman, then he is evil and expressing hatred, but if a woman seduces a man, then she is good and expressing love?

So you're saying that the female's sexuality is inherently good and loving, and that the male's sexuality is inherently evil and hating? I may agree with you genetic feces. This is how you Jews and Christians view human sexuality. A man's sexuality is hateful. A woman's sexuality is loving and caring.
Dah no.

I think people are concerned that you seem to think that rape is acceptable.

Sex is not about 'overpowering' another. You might have fantasies about it, or even though that you had practiced this, but if the other partner is not willing then what you have done is rape. And is the other partner is willing then you have not overpowered that person though you might think your self very clever or butch for having done so.

A person overpowering another for a sexual purpose, be they a woman or a man, that is RAPE. And you should know it is illegal and nearly always considered morally unacceptable in civilised countries.
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by uwot »

"Are you genetic feces saying, that if a man overpowers and has sex with a woman, then he is evil and expressing hatred, but if a woman seduces a man, then she is good and expressing love?"

The difference is that someone being seduced has a choice. Just because every time Satyr says ‘suck my dick’ you do so, it doesn’t follow that everyone has such a pathetic lack of self-respect or control.
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: Misogyny

Post by Satyr »

BrainWashing

1 Gender
2 Parental Effect
3 Gay/Straight
4 Violence
5 Sex
6 Race
7 Nature vs. Nurture


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some conflict on the YouTube community regarding Evolution Theory.

Realists vs. Liberal Twats

EvoGen here is the Liberal Twat.

Heritability

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liberal Twat versus Scientists
You know which side you belong to.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think some of the more vocal liberal retards on this forum will recognize themselves in this polemic.
Why egalitarians Lie...so MUCH!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Egalitarian Tactics (War on Common Sense)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Race and I.Q. - Egalitarianism Destroyed (LebertarianRealist vs. EvoGen) ...or Realist versus Liberal Twat.

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richard Lynn explains Eugenics and Dysgenics

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. William Shockley on Race, I.Q., and Eugenics

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hans Eysenck on Race and I.Q.

1
2


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lunatic Fringe Episode 009 - The Way of Men

Part of the Backlash:
Men of the West...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Love the cigarette and drink effect.
A bit pretentious but...aware.
Is Race Realism Racism?

Fight Club & C.S. Lewis
Lewis Vs Palahniuk Pt 2: Food Porn and Making Love
Feminism: Gender is Genetic

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: Misogyny

Post by Satyr »

DoucheBag loves playing word games....and avoids answering questions.
She begins after a category has been formulated....like when he approaches some being he cannot determine if it is male or female and asks: "Are you a bachelor?"...rather than "Are you unmarried?"...the turd has already categorized the individuals, placing him/her in a group that DOES say something about them yet she plays mind games, semantically trying to maintain her delusions about her own uniqueness.

WotWot enters a doctor DocDoc's office.
"Doc" he says "I've got red liquid coming out of my anus, what shall I do? I can't call it blood because that category does not say anything about this particular red liquid coming out of my particular anus. Even calling it a 'liquid' says nothing about it."
DocDoc shrugs...
"Don't know...I got my degree by studying specimens and groups who experienced anal seepage....I can't apply my learning to individual cases. Place your faith in God...the all encompassing category."


Someone should tell doctors, biologists, psychologists, cosmologists, philosophers, scientists in general etc. (big categories that say nothing about their particular fields of study) that when they study groups, categories, breeds, types, they know nothing...because the individual, the particular, always falls "outside" their categories.
Wasting their time is what they are doing.
Never-mind if "individual" is another category.

They must study every single particular, individual, something, separately.
At this point we cannot even call it plant or animal or mammal because these categories say nothing about the individual specimen.
Categorizing it by studying it, would prevent us from applying our knowledge to any other specimen of tat category, as every individual is never defined by any type, category, except "individual".
Someone should tell historians that studying the past cannot be used to understand the present, nor should it be used to predict the future, making experience and knowledge irrelevant and useless, because every instance is a new beginning and is free of the past - a perpetual tabula rasa - and is in no way determined by it.
If you have experienced with a particular dog biting you you must not use this past as an indication of its potential future behavior towards you.
This would be prejudiced and wrong.
Past behavior is no indication of future behavior...ergo when people with brains use the past to formulate categories by studying patterns predicting future behavior they are bigots and imbeciles.
A group of asses behaving in a articular way is no indication as to how they will behave nor does it say anything about each ass' particular behavior.
We must engage every new phenomena like infantile minds...retards suffering from brain damage....lost souls who have drank from the river Lethe.

They say the category "smoker" has a higher "probability" of getting cancer and dying...but the ones who say it bases their assumptions on groups and his analysis of them and the individuals that comprise them...so the individual smoker can rest easy and he can keep on smoking.

I went shopping the other day...saw a particular thing that looked like what those stupid scientists call an apple. Could not say because this was an individual fruit...but then fruit is also a category...so it was a thing...wait...that too is a category.
Let's just say I saw some-thing...I could not make sense of it as it was a particular.

I'm like a goldfish with a 3 second memory.
When I see a creature I must evaluate it anew because placing it in a category and using my previous experiences of this category as a standard to predict this individual's probable or potential behavior would be evil and wrong of me.
I'm like a child who never grows up.

Those stupid scientists say that, on average, chimps are not as intelligent as humans...but I'm sure there's a genius chimp out there smarter than the average poster here, therefor that assumption is useless as it says nothing about the potential of the individual belonging to that group.
The possibility are infinite and if the slightest possibility of a contradiction to the rule exists, then the rule is useless.
Empiricism is a sham...a joke.

They say that the average n*****'s I.Q. is 85...using the European average I.Q.'s as a standard at 100. I know there's a pure-blood n***** out there with an I.Q. of 100 or more, making that average useless, for it does not tell me anything about the most probable I.Q. range of the particular n*****.
He most probably is around 85...but I must not be cruel and jump to conclusions. he might be that upper 1% n***** with an I.Q. of 100.
Because averages do not tell us the median around which all the members of the group relate too without exceeding it to the point where it is meaningless.
A group might have an average height of 6 feet, but one of them might be 100 feet tall....and the others closer to 1 foot tall...so I cannot gauge the upper and lower limit by the average, knowing the number of the sample group....and I certainly cannot make any prediction or assumptions about the groups outside the sample group, making my practice of suing sample groups nonsensical.
What a joke science is.
The only group that matters, for it says everything about the individual is the group: human.

If I know the average dog loves meat...I buy vegetables for my own particular, individual Bonzo....because he's far too complex to be understood with categories.

They tell me a breed of cow produces on average 30% more milk than another breed of cow. I, like a healthy, open-minded, modern, cowboy, choose to purchase the other cow breed because the average production of milk of that breed tells me nothing about that particular cow.

I enter a car dealership. The salesman is an upstanding fella, he tells me that this type of automobile burns, on average, 20% more gas than the other type...but I cannot decide because he did not tell me what this particular one, of that type, burns. So I buy at random...'cause I'm enlightened and smart...and fashionably retarded.

I saw an individual some-thing yesterday (let's forget that thing is also a category)...it sort of looked like one of those that belongs in the category squirrel.
I cannot make presumptions about anything based on my senses...making all evaluations impossible. I live in a constant void.
I could not say because it was an individual and I knew nothing about it just by looking at it.
It remains a mystery to me to this day as to what that thing was.
I could not predict, just by placing it in the category of squirrel, if it liked nuts, or if it was as smart as me, or if it could climb trees.

I'll be gone soon.
The sheep dogs are circling.
But, given that sheep dog is a category with an average behavior I cannot predict the behavior of any particular sheep dog here.
I am an eternal innocent.
Some call this group: retarded.
Last edited by Satyr on Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: Misogyny

Post by chaz wyman »

When the brain ceases to function through hybris and dislocation we have bullet points!
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: Misogyny

Post by Satyr »

Your lesson must be postponed, my mentor.
I'm sure it had something to do with not judging individuals by their appearance....or how cooperation was better than competition.

I leave you to Lyotard and those complex names you learned to parrot because the world itself was too much for you to handle directly.
If offering opinions on opinion is what you call thinking, then is art an imitation of art?
The post-modern man finding comfort in leveling the world into dust...losing himself in the relief of nothingness.

Welcome to the desert of the real, turd.
Here everything vanishes in nihilistic anxiety.
Nothing matters because nothing could be said about anything based on appearances.
Man is crippled by postponing judgment.
All we can do is love each other....fornicate ourselves into oblivion.

The end stage of a culture, after it has passed through the phase of civilization, is decadence: hedonism, materialism, endless escape in logos.
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by uwot »

Hi Satyr

“But, given that sheep dog is a category with an average behavior I cannot predict the behavior of any particular sheep dog here.”

By Jove, I think he’s got it!
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: Misogyny

Post by Satyr »

:lol:
This is wonderful...all knowledge and experience erased.
History eliminated....the past overcome with...words.

Modern means being an imbecile....a child forever.
I get it.

Thank God, the only REAL thing I can be certain of, and His parental protection.
Self-lobotomies required.

I walk into a room full of things....I'll call them creatures for convenience sake...for they can be no-things.
I cannot say what any of them are since every time I see a thing, a some-thing, I cannot categorize it nor presume anything about it before I question it.
I must trust in its own self-knowledge. It must tell me what it is itself, otherwise I cannot judge it or determine what it is using my senses. The only sense requires is hearing.

I approach one that looks like one of those creatures those imbecile scientists call female.
I ask:
"Hello thing, are you male or female?"

It replies:
"What gross over-generalizations. Biologically I am female but I prefer to consider myself male, though I have no penis and cannot produce sperm."

I respond;
"No matter, because your choice is what matters and I am prevented from categorizing you because I am a moron and cannot use any other sense except selective hearing. I choose to be one, because it is less frightening. So, tell me sir...are you a bachelor?"

"Indeed I am" (s)he says."I am a bachelor because I am male, as I prefer to define myself as such though others, those haters and bigots, claim that my vagina makes me a female, and I am also unmarried, because here the social conventions is one I accept. Tomorrow I may wake up and change my mind...making me too complex to be categorized at any time by anyone. I invent myself every morning or, sometimes, in the middle of the day. I simply change the word associated with my identity and poof, I am new."

"Fabulous!" I explain, relishing my new-found freedom from existence and my past.
Then I see another...creature that looks sort of female...but I cannot allow myself, using my previous experience to decide.
I must ask it, personally, because that's how I live my life now...in total ignorance...a knave in a sea of chaos.
But it feels liberating....like a narcotic haze.

My master prefers me like this.
Atthet
Posts: 348
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:53 am

Re: Misogyny

Post by Atthet »

uwot wrote:being seduced has a choice
How is seducing somebody giving them a choice?
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: Misogyny

Post by Satyr »

BrainWashing

1 Gender
2 Parental Effect
3 Gay/Straight
4 Violence
5 Sex
6 Race
7 Nature vs. Nurture


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some conflict on the YouTube community regarding Evolution Theory.

Realists vs. Liberal Twats

EvoGen here is the Liberal Twat.

Heritability

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liberal Twat versus Scientists
You know which side you belong to.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think some of the more vocal liberal retards on this forum will recognize themselves in this polemic.
Why egalitarians Lie...so MUCH!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Egalitarian Tactics (War on Common Sense)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Race and I.Q. - Egalitarianism Destroyed (LebertarianRealist vs. EvoGen) ...or Realist versus Liberal Twat.

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richard Lynn explains Eugenics and Dysgenics

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. William Shockley on Race, I.Q., and Eugenics

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hans Eysenck on Race and I.Q.

1
2


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lunatic Fringe Episode 009 - The Way of Men

Part of the Backlash:
Men of the West...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Love the cigarette and drink effect.
A bit pretentious but aware.
Is Race Realism Racism?

Fight Club & C.S. Lewis
Lewis Vs Palahniuk Pt 2: Food Porn and Making Love
Feminism: Gender is Genetic

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One for the laaaadies out there. Especially those with a penis.

Male Disposability

The human species is funny.
I love just watching them go....and go.
Men not marrying? How deep does "the problem" go?

Fempocalypse!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
User avatar
Satyr
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Location: The Edge
Contact:

Re: Misogyny

Post by Satyr »

Atthet wrote:
uwot wrote:being seduced has a choice
How is seducing somebody giving them a choice?
Presumably being overpowered mentally is also not the same as being overpowered physically.

Ironic how sex is wonderful when the women spreads her legs willingly, and a total abomination when she does not.

Ironic how being penetrated is something that comes easy in nature....you know allowing a foreign body into your own is no intrusion at all.
Ironic how nature has to develop a mechanism by which the individual is less intolerant of a bigger more powerful presence next to her, beside her, inside her...one which is less aggressive, smaller and easily overpowered - a specialized type which also possesses the physical AND mental attributes necessary for her to carry out her biological role.
Otherwise, why the fuck have a male and a female? Is God a hedonist?
Ironic how she also has to be overwhelmed by hormones to give-in and how in more sophisticated species she has to be overcome by an emotional cocktail, numbing her better judgments and silencing her fight/flight mechanism.
Ironic how even her body has to be tricked to accept the alien sperm before her autoimmune system kills them off....and ironic how this does not always work.

Ironic how in nature rape is a choice....a method
So much so that females have to submit to a strong dominant male so as to prevent constant male abuse.
Ironic how she must give-in by servicing the alpha male, enabling her to then sample the genetic wares available to her. Her "choice" in essence is made possible by her acquiescence to a powerful masculine entity...in modern times this is called an institution.
Only IT gets to exploit her...offering her the option of playing with the boys carefree under his watchful protection.

Ironic how only female choice matters.
Post Reply