Let's take this further, genetic fecesreasonvemotion wrote:Read the scriptures, his one and ONLY...... no daughters. I don't know why I even bother to acknowledge you. Cretin.
Before, I asked you a question, one of the countless you will dodge like a coward, you female philosopher. That question was, if Abraham was asked by God to stick a knife into his only child, his daughter, instead of a son, gut her intestines, and drain her blood into the soil, to show loyalty to God, then how many Jews and Christians would follow this God? You moron, answer it. However, we all know that you will not answer my questions, because you are a coward.
Moving on without you, let's ask another question. Let's take this small twist and twist it tighter. Let's invert the inversion, one more time. Let's ask if a woman named Abigail, a mother, was asked to sacrifice her child, her daughter Isobel, to God. How would this change the Judeo-Christian mythology? Why is it important that God, is male, Abraham, is male, and Isaac, is male? Why is the gender important? Is the gender important?
What does this say about your Judeo-Christian culture, you genetic fece? Answer one of these questions, allemotion
Would Jews and Christians follow God if the child sacrifice, or the parent perpetrating this, was female instead of male?
I'm going to give you genetic feces the answer, because I know you don't know. The answer is no, Jews and Christians would not follow this creed, because Jews and Christians tolerate male sacrifice, sacrifice of males intrinsically, but never the sacrifice of daughters. Judeo-Christianity is a gender-biased institution, that puts the innate, intrinsic value of females over males. A daughter is worth more, in these institutions, than a son.
That "feminism" exists, and purports this cultural dogma, is a bygone conclusion.