reasonvemotion wrote:
It cannot be so, if one considers relative truths. Can it?
The best our language can provide is using 'truth' with a small 't' and Truth using the capital 'T'. When using the 'small 't' we generally use it to identify more so the facts as we see/know them.
The 'capital T' Truth is the area of metaphysics that Aristotle (and many others) spoke of. When we enter metaphysics we should not drag along our emotional and intellectual baggage that we have all been indoctrinated by not because these things are not worthy and useful in our mundane existence. Metaphysics must rely upon a degree of honesty within the seeker of Truth that does not allow for anything other than Truth to prevail over opinions and even certain worldly facts that are based upon our own 5 senses... our hu'man-ness that is driven by ego.
The initial path of this Metaphysical Journey uses the obvious tools given us by our nature, the questions of who, what, why, where and when until each one of those questions have been answered in full, leaving no doubt or any other question hanging like a bad fruit on a tree. Once all the questions have been answered, thus ends the quest and contentedness begins.