Male Interviolence

[Atthet]

Football, the American kind, not the pussy European soccer kind
War, killing
Martial Arts
Criminality, thieving, stealing, raping

Violence perpetuated by men, against other men, is tolerated to a limited degree in every society, culture, and history of people on Earth. Men killing men, is perfectly acceptable, no matter what religious, moral, or historical system you investigate. Male aggressive is a universal rule, and tolerated in contextual and specific circumstances.

It is not until male violence spills "over" the boundaries of inter-male fighting, and onto women and children, that violence is not tolerated, and hateful. Hateful, remember this word. Because this accusation of "hateful" and "hatred", is very specific in liberal and humanist institutions. Why was Hitler hateful? Or, why must we all hate Hitler? I will contend, he was hateful, not because he slaughtered lots of men, or even lots of Jewish men. It was because he advocated the extermination of women and children, particularly, that he became "evil" by Western, Judeo-Christian, and liberal morality.
It isn't until Eugenics targets women and children, that it is no longer tolerated.
This limit, this tolerance, this social and moral taboo, is one of the highest and unspoken, censored and exiled taboos, in the history of human existence. It is this liberal hypocrisy, and logical contradiction, that is used to control and enslave the majority of the world's populace. Why?

Why?
Because by controlling this definition, of good and evil, that morality can become controlled, redefined, and enforced against anyone, except of course, women and children. As far as women and children go, it's "hands off". Liberal morality, including Judaism and Christianity, take a concrete approach to this. This is a "no go" zone. But, ironically, let's include black women, and minority women in the United States. Let's talk about abortion, and the exceptions to even this liberal rule. This is another provocative and controversial stance.
Becuase once I highlight the struggle of young black women in America, and that these women and children are in fact targeted by Eugenic principles, laws, and social expectations, then the real shit storm appears. Eugenics is a law of nature. And it is fought to the death, daily, by people who know the importance and realism, of such laws and standards of nature.
Talk about abortion.

[Atthet]

If women and girls, as a gender, and as a specie, is untouchable by moral and natural law, and the laws of men and societies across the world, and even religious, and mystical, absolute laws...then what are the consequences of this? What is the consequence of placing women and children into a "no touching zone", where men who attempt to cross this barrier, penetrating and molesting children, is known as pedophilia and illegality of the worst possible kind? What is the consequence, morally and socially, of creating a barrier of immunity and impunity? An impossible ethical barrier?

Let's talk about this, what is more important truly, ethically, and morally, than the protection of children and "innocence"? Is this not the heart of universal and objective morality, even the difference and definition of specie? By creating this impossible barrier, I will contend here and now, that people automatically create a type of universal and objective morality. And the most popular forms of morality across the world, Christianity, does attempt to deal with this. We call this "innocence" or "spirituality" or essence of the "soul". What is innocence? Why is it impossible to deal with, ethically? Why ought we call small children, infants, male or female, boys or girls, "immune"?
Why is the sin of the father not passed onto his son or daughter?
Why must we not condemn the progeny of a rapist, a bastard father and disgusting man, that his crime will not pass onto the child settled into the womb of his "victim"? Don't women, and all people, hate the rapist? Why, obviously? He does not "respect" the natural, moral barrier. He does not respect the "innocence" of women, and children, why and why not? How is this even physically possible.
And then, magically, under the premises of liberalism, we say that his children, his protege that was begotten into this world by a crime, is "innocent" of the crime of his or her father?
And then Jews, Christians, and liberals have the gall, the audacity to claim morality! Can you fucking believe this?! How is this even possible?

It's possible due to ignorance, and blindness. It's possible due to how we create these labels of "good" and "evil", with regard to human sexuality, and gender. It's possible due to a biological imperative, that genders have between each other, as men and women, male and female.

[Atthet]

Let's take this premise further. If Muslims trained their children in the United Kingdom to suicide bomb or go on a gun rampage, to terrorize and kill white, English people in their own homeland, then how could law, morality, or ethics address the situation of a child murderer? Aren't children irresponsible for themselves? Shouldn't we never blame the progeny of a rape, of the crimes of his father? Children are blameless, aren't they? So then, how do we charge the crime of a child murderer? Under what possible ethical doctrine, could a punishment be invoked, if at all?
If children are not responsible for their actions, then how are adults any different?
Liberals will say, it's all about "education". Is this true? If it's all about education, then who is to claim that Muslims and Islam, is the "wrong" way to educate children?

[Grendel]

I've heard America has sports, I've even heard there's more than one and I'm pretty sure they possibly even have different names, but I've never bothered to find out what these names are. Instead, me, and every other non-American human being that has ever or will ever live on planet earth in the entire history of the human race use a much simpler system when referring to American sport, we just call them 'who gives a flying fuck'.

[Lynn]

As far as women and children go, it's "hands off". Liberal morality, including Judaism and Christianity, take a concrete approach to this. This is a "no go" zone.

Violence is not at the completely 'hands off' stage yet. Less than 200 years ago, most US legal systems supported a husband's authority to beat his wife. I know some men still see this as their right to do so, regarding their wives and families as their chattels. But hopefully their numbers will get fewer as time passes and they die out. Then hopefully the majority of men will become all men and 'hands off' will apply across the board.

[Impenitent]

sharia law and the new democratic muslim brotherhood sweeping the nations is great for women...

-Imp

[Kayla]

Violence is not at the completely 'hands off' stage yet. Less than 200 years ago, most US legal systems supported a husband's authority to beat his wife. I know some men still see this as their right to do so, regarding their wives and families as their chattels. But hopefully their numbers will get fewer as time passes and they die out. Then hopefully the majority of men will become all men and 'hands off' will apply across the board.

in my neck of the woods the idea that women must obey their husbands much like the latter should obey god is not entirely dead yet

but outside of some closed cult environments even the most fundamentalist preacher is afraid to voice it

most volunteers helping to run baptist churches are women and any preacher trying to push that agenda will find himself with no help

[Atthet]

The language has changed. Christianity and Judaism have not "died". God is not "dead". The only significant change between the 20th Century and the 21st Century, is the change of language. The Christian of yester years now calls himself an "atheist". The Jew now calls himself "secular" or a "humanitarian". The name of God, the Word of God, has changed. It is not dead, merely morphed into a new Word.
Can you guess what this word is? Is it not "Science"? Isn't science, now, the Word of God? Isn't a Scientist also a Priest, dictating objective and absolute truths or falsehood? What is evidence, except those dictated to the masses by scientific experts?
Expert Witness

You pathetic pieces of shit, most on this forum, don't see it, or realize it, yet. But you will, soon. This anti-philosophical era must come to an end, now. God has not changed, but adapted. The systems of morality, ethics, slaves, and masters, everything has changed names and labels, but the concepts themselves have remained entirely unchanged. Call it "The Matrix". Call it a "Memeplex". Call it society, state, nature, laws, God, the system, whatever name you prefer.
Just don't pretend it is what it's not, or it's not what it is. If you do that, then you're fucked!
What is this all about? It's about slavery and mastery, dominance and subversion. It's about control. It's about the past, present, and future. It's about male inter violence. It's about violence in nature. It's about "necessary" evil.
Is evil necessary? Evil can't be necessary, if it doesn't exist, you dipshit! What were you thinking?
You moral relativists, you Jews and Christians, calling yourselves now "atheists" and "secular humanists", have not changed your nature! You have not changed your essence, by switching words around! A frog calling itself a cat, is not, now, a cat, you moron!

Why does the Master Slave Dialectic change? It changes, because just about once per generation, or sometimes once per two or three generations, depending on the lifestyles of the time, and the environment, a few wise men catch wind of all this, a few wise men become illuminated by philosophical knowledge, the highest education, and wrest control of the system. Sometimes a man gains control, and takes hold of the stern. Sometimes the ship is not being guided by a captain, so somebody steps up to the plate. God wasn't "dead". Nietzsche did not kill him. We all, Western Civilization, society, history, whatever you want to call it, just changed the name.
That's all that was done. It's that simple.

[chaz wyman]

Football, the American kind, not the pussy European soccer kind
War, killing
Martial Arts
Criminality, thieving, stealing, raping

Violence perpetuated by men, against other men, is tolerated to a limited degree in every society, culture, and history of people on Earth. Men killing men, is perfectly acceptable, no matter what religious, moral, or historical system you investigate. Male aggressive is a universal rule, and tolerated in contextual and specific circumstances.

It is not until male violence spills "over" the boundaries of inter-male fighting, and onto women and children, that violence is not tolerated, and hateful. Hateful, remember this word. Because this accusation of "hateful" and "hatred", is very specific in liberal and humanist institutions. Why was Hitler hateful? Or, why must we all hate Hitler? I will contend, he was hateful, not because he slaughtered lots of men, or even lots of Jewish men. It was because he advocated the extermination of women and children, particularly, that he became "evil" by Western, Judeo-Christian, and liberal morality.
It isn't until Eugenics targets women and children, that it is no longer tolerated.
This limit, this tolerance, this social and moral taboo, is one of the highest and unspoken, censored and exiled taboos, in the history of human existence. It is this liberal hypocrisy, and logical contradiction, that is used to control and enslave the majority of the world's populace. Why?

Why?
Because by controlling this definition, of good and evil, that morality can become controlled, redefined, and enforced against anyone, except of course, women and children. As far as women and children go, it's "hands off". Liberal morality, including Judaism and Christianity, take a concrete approach to this. This is a "no go" zone. But, ironically, let's include black women, and minority women in the United States. Let's talk about abortion, and the exceptions to even this liberal rule. This is another provocative and controversial stance.
Becuase once I highlight the struggle of young black women in America, and that these women and children are in fact targeted by Eugenic principles, laws, and social expectations, then the real shit storm appears. Eugenics is a law of nature. And it is fought to the death, daily, by people who know the importance and realism, of such laws and standards of nature.
Talk about abortion.

You are without exception more full of shit than anyone else on this board.

There is a difference between American Football (a bit gay compared to Rugby), and killing.
Hitler is hated because he waged war om the world. Making a distinction between killing men (apparently alright) and killing males jews, women and children (not alright) is probably the most stupid thing I have read in a while.
Your mind numbingly idiotic statement; "It isn't until Eugenics targets women and children, that it is no longer tolerated.". Is so far wide of the mark that the rest of the text descends into verbal diarrhoea. For this statement to make any sense, please show where eugenics is being practiced at all.
Then you contradict yourself by claiming that eugenics against Black women is not only tolerated but targeted by "Eugenic principles, laws, and social expectations". Make up your fucking mind!

You are a fuckwit.

[Atthet]

You are without exception more full of shit than anyone else on this board.

There is a difference between American Football (a bit gay compared to Rugby), and killing.
Hitler is hated because he waged war om the world.

No, Hitler is hated because Jewish women and children were killed under his leadership in Nazi Germany. That's the one and only reason. Hitler is not hated, around the world, if at all, because he killed European women and children. He's hated and demonized, because God's Chosen ones were killed during the war.

Making a distinction between killing men (apparently alright) and killing males jews, women and children (not alright) is probably the most stupid thing I have read in a while.

Don't cry, truth hurts cheeze, I'm doing this for your own good. I'm strengthening that noodle you call your brain, for your own good! Think of me as your father, who cares for you, nurtures you, protects you from yourself.

Your mind numbingly idiotic statement; "It isn't until Eugenics targets women and children, that it is no longer tolerated.". Is so far wide of the mark that the rest of the text descends into verbal diarrhoea. For this statement to make any sense, please show where eugenics is being practiced at all.

The abortion industry in the United States, led and run mostly by Jews

Then you contradict yourself by claiming that eugenics against Black women is not only tolerated but targeted by "Eugenic principles, laws, and social expectations". Make up your fucking mind!

You are a fuckwit.

Black women and children have not fallen under God's chosen ones, and so, nobody sheds a tear about their genocide. Even white abortion is tolerated and acceptable in the United States. Now, imagine this, cheeze.
Imagine if the abortion industry targeted Jewish women and children.
Imagine that, wouldn't it become outlawed overnight? Wouldn't riots break out in the street, due to anti-semitism and racism? Wouldn't the world stop, at the prospect of Jewish women and children being targeted by "racist", "anti-semitic" eugenics?
Of course it would!

My question to you, cheeze, is this. How do I, as a non-Jew, acquire this "God's Chosen" status? It sounds enviable! I want to become fully protected and privileged, valued above everybody else! Tell me how! I want this status, too! Can't it ever be possible for men to have equal or more value than women and children?
When the Titanic is sinking, we should start encouraging the single men to be the first ones on the lifeboats, not women and children. Men are intrinsically more valuable than women and children?

[chaz wyman]

You are without exception more full of shit than anyone else on this board.

There is a difference between American Football (a bit gay compared to Rugby), and killing.
Hitler is hated because he waged war on the world.

No, Hitler is hated because Jewish women and children were killed under his leadership in Nazi Germany. That's the one and only reason. Hitler is not hated, around the world, if at all, because he killed European women and children. He's hated and demonized, because God's Chosen ones were killed during the war.

You are talking like a ****, as usual. Millions of Britons suffering under nightly air-raids, knew fuck all about the Jews in Germany - they hated Hitler for destroying their homes.
20 million Russians who died during the war hated Hitler for his military campaign, they too knew nothing about the holocaust.
You are too ignorant for words.

Your mind numbingly idiotic statement; "It isn't until Eugenics targets women and children, that it is no longer tolerated.". Is so far wide of the mark that the rest of the text descends into verbal diarrhoea. For this statement to make any sense, please show where eugenics is being practiced at all.

The abortion industry in the United States, led and run mostly by Jews

The law on abortion enshrines the women's right to choose.

Then you contradict yourself by claiming that eugenics against Black women is not only tolerated but targeted by "Eugenic principles, laws, and social expectations". Make up your fucking mind!

You are a fuckwit.

My question to you, cheeze, is this. How do I, as a non-Jew, acquire this "God's Chosen" status? It sounds enviable!

You can't be neither can they - there is no god.
Why not ask "Forged in Hell", he claims to be a Jew and an atheist

I want to become fully protected and privileged, valued above everybody else! Tell me how! I want this status, too! Can't it ever be possible for men to have equal or more value than women and children?

First you have to learn how to respect yourself. By attacking others you are attacking yourself.
From what I have read, you will never deserve what you seek.

When the Titanic is sinking, we should start encouraging the single men to be the first ones on the lifeboats, not women and children. Men are intrinsically more valuable than women and children?

Except you - you are clearly worthless.

[Atthet]

Haha, cheeze wine man. I just thought of that.

[chaz wyman]

Haha, cheeze wine man. I just thought of that.

Yeah, you mean you realised you were wrong.
I'll accept your apology.

[Atthet]

You're wrong, cheeze wine man. Europeans are taught to hate Hitler, and see him as the embodiment of evil, because "six million" Jewish women and children died in the war. That's all that matters. We aren't educated to hear, "Hitler killed six million human beings", why not? Because "human being" doesn't mean anything! If Hitler kills six million humans, then who, the hell, cares? People don't care if humans die. People care if their family, their brothers and sisters, their neighbors die!
People care if their country is at war, not if other countries are at war, you moron!
People don't care about the "human" race.

Hitler was evil, because Jewish women and children died, that's all it was. We are all educated, throughout Western civilization, that you and your kin, your Jewish ilk, are "God's Chosen". And it seems true, doesn't it? Where is my privilege? Where is my protection, as a non-Jew? Where are the tears and pity and sympathy, for me? Where were all the tears for the twenty million Russians who died? Why does nobody, nobody, give a shit, about them?

Some women and children are valued above all others. What does this tell you, after you understand the propaganda? Why are so many people "anti-semitic", when they are taught this as children? Why do Jews become resented, when Hollywood produces zionist films that promote and reinforce everything I've just said. Hitler wasn't evil because he killed six million.....people. Nobody gives one damn, about "people".
Why not?
Do you know, why people don't care about "people" or the holocaust and genocide of "humans"?
What does this say about distinction, about ethnic pride and solidarity, about nationalism and socialism, about human nature, about race?

What does this say about discrimination? If we cannot discriminate people apart, then why is one group of women and children, more valuable than another? Why, mother fucker, why?

[chaz wyman]

You're wrong, cheeze wine man. Europeans are taught to hate Hitler,

I am a teacher working in the UK, we do not teach anyone to hate Hitler.
Hitler and his followers, like you are history.
I didn't bother reading the rest of this bullshit.