duszek wrote:The Bad and the Ugly can be sanctioned by ignoring them.
The Good can be promoted by focusing on it and paying attention to it.
Quote by duszek (Mon Jun 18th, 2012, 2.15 pm) - my bolds
Nietzsche despised the reader as such and said it bluntly.
And still millions of readers devour his writings passionately.
Oscar Wilde appreciated a good enemy. I agree, an enemy can teach you interesting things indirectly.
This thread isn't meant to be about sanctioning or ignoring - it is to show appreciation to all PN contributors; even the devilish - and those who make you think...by simply adding their words... or how they have used other quotes to underline/mine an argument.
And everyone will have a different view of what is Good, Bad or Ugly !
Good: positive/desirable eg a good joke ( but some might find bad or ugly ! ); skilled ( use of quotes

); valuable ( to the readers/thinkers ); admirable ( oh, my hero *faints*); generous ( a gift of an idea/insight)
Bad: OK, can also be used slangly as 'good' or 'excellent' but usually: not achieving an adequate standard/negative eg a poor joke (but even cringes can be 'fun', no ? ); evil ( surely not

); vulgar ( oh my, spare my

); unpleasant or disturbing (hmmm, but ain't that whot philo is about ?); naughty/mischievous...
Ugly: offensive, objectionable eg ugly temper/rude; menacing; bad-tempered; sullen. Compare the 'beautiful' words of which AS speaks.
And so on...
but really, again this isn't so much a classification or aesthetic exercise - just a short 'recognition' of someone's time/effort.
Like your quote above
