Don't you think it's odd...

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Don't you think it's odd...

Post by bobevenson »

...that I knew more about the identification of the beast with the name/number 666 in the book of Revelation than Encyclopaedia Britannica, or that I knew more about the origination of Cincinnati's Queen City name than the Cincinnati Library or the Cincinnati Historical Society?
chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by chaz wyman »

bobevenson wrote:...that I knew more about the identification of the beast with the name/number 666 in the book of Revelation than Encyclopaedia Britannica, or that I knew more about the origination of Cincinnati's Queen City name than the Cincinnati Library or the Cincinnati Historical Society?
Still banging on about the Cincinatti Gay scene?
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by bobevenson »

chaz wyman wrote:
bobevenson wrote:...that I knew more about the identification of the beast with the name/number 666 in the book of Revelation than Encyclopaedia Britannica, or that I knew more about the origination of Cincinnati's Queen City name than the Cincinnati Library or the Cincinnati Historical Society?
Still banging on about the Cincinatti Gay scene?
No, you pathetic homosexual, but it is true that I know more about 666 than Encyclopaedia Britannica (see http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/encyclope ... annica.pdf) and more about Cincinnati than its library (see http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/public-li ... innati.pdf). As you know, Cincinnati is compared to ancient Rome in "The Ouzo Prophecy," and my divinely inspired discovey of the first mention of Cincinnati as a queen, that could have been taken directly from the book of Revelation's description of ancient Rome (see http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/church-of-ouzo.pdf), further establishes my credentials as a prophet, O my brothers in tribulation!
Thundril
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:37 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by Thundril »

Now, now, girls!
You know using 'gay' as an insult is very juvenile?
You're big grown-up girls now, so make friends and play nice, or you'll both be sent to the naughty step, and you know what happens there, don't you?
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by bobevenson »

Thundril wrote:You know using 'gay' as an insult is very juvenile?
That's why I'd rather point-blank just call him a fucking homosexual and dare him to deny it! But more to the point, what do you think of my credentials as a prophet, pretty airtight, right?
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by Arising_uk »

No I don't.

As you are a delusional godbotherer with extreme selective reading and confirmation bias, probably a schizophrenic who has stopped taking the meds, so such things were bound to happen.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by bobevenson »

Arising_uk wrote: As you are a delusional godbotherer with extreme selective reading and confirmation bias, probably a schizophrenic who has stopped taking the meds, so such things were bound to happen.
You know, I'm firmly against the government interfering in people's lives, but if it made a law against using the non-word "godbotherer," I think I would consider it the exception that proves the rule since you are the only person on Earth who uses it anyway.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by Arising_uk »

bobevenson wrote:You know, I'm firmly against the government interfering in people's lives, but if it made a law against using the non-word "godbotherer," I think I would consider it the exception that proves the rule since you are the only person on Earth who uses it anyway.
Told you I invented it, a pretty divine occurrence don't ya think.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by bobevenson »

Arising_uk wrote:
bobevenson wrote:You know, I'm firmly against the government interfering in people's lives, but if it made a law against using the non-word "godbotherer," I think I would consider it the exception that proves the rule since you are the only person on Earth who uses it anyway.
Told you I invented it, a pretty divine occurrence don't ya think?

Caught you in another lie!!!

World English Dictionary
God-botherer (ˈɡɒdˌbɒðərə)
— n
informal an over-zealous Christian

Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition
2009 © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins
Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009
Cite This Source
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by Arising_uk »

bobevenson wrote:...Caught you in another lie!!!
:roll: Your selective amnesia is kicking in as we've had this conversation already.

But they must have heard it from me as to the best of my knowledge I was 'divinely' inspired back in the '80s but then I was hanging around with some squaddies so maybe the drugs have erased my memory. What's your excuse? :lol:

Also my understanding is that a godbotherer is different from a god-botherer, as the latter bothers others about 'God' whereas the former bothers 'God'.
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by bobevenson »

Arising_uk wrote:
bobevenson wrote:...Caught you in another lie!!!
:roll: Your selective amnesia is kicking in as we've had this conversation already.

But they must have heard it from me as to the best of my knowledge I was 'divinely' inspired back in the '80s but then I was hanging around with some squaddies so maybe the drugs have erased my memory. What's your excuse? :lol:

Also my understanding is that a godbotherer is different from a god-botherer, as the latter bothers others about 'God' whereas the former bothers 'God'.
Christ, you don't know a damn thing about the English language, as though a hyphen changes the meaning of a fucking word, you idiot!
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by Arising_uk »

bobevenson wrote:Christ, you don't know a damn thing about the English language, as though a hyphen changes the meaning of a fucking word, you idiot!
How do words get meaning boob?
bobevenson
Posts: 7346
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: Don't you think it's odd...

Post by bobevenson »

Arising_uk wrote:
bobevenson wrote:Christ, you don't know a damn thing about the English language, as though a hyphen changes the meaning of a fucking word, you idiot!
How do words get meaning boob?
Stick to the point, idiot. You don't change the meaning of a word by using a hyphen. Go back to school, dum-dum.
Post Reply