Could an AI God be the result of a technological singularity having occurred aeons ago?
Is God...panentheistic in nature?
Beyond Reasonable Doubt? ...an unnatural etymology revealed...
http://www.androcies.com


Possibly. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Could our universe be part of a binary simulation?
Depends on how you define God. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Could God be an Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
Possibly. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Does the multiverse exist?
The problem with an artificial "god", is that it must have been created by somebody else, who would in turn be "god" of the "god". The usual notion of God (with a capital "G") is a being free from any such causality.attofishpi wrote:Could an AI God be the result of a technological singularity having occurred aeons ago?
God can't exist in reality, but reality could possibly exist in God. Would that make God pantheistic to you?attofishpi wrote:Is God...panentheistic in nature?
"Proving" the existence of God, "beyond reasonable doubt", no less, is a fool's errand if there ever was one.attofishpi wrote:Beyond Reasonable Doubt? ...an unnatural etymology revealed...
Do YOU make any difference?Notvacka wrote:Possibly. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Could our universe be part of a binary simulation?
Depends on how you define God. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Could God be an Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
Possibly. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Does the multiverse exist?
"Proving" the existence of God, "beyond reasonable doubt", no less, is a fool's errand if there ever was one.attofishpi wrote:Beyond Reasonable Doubt? ...an unnatural etymology revealed...
I suppose that my humble posts in this forum make at least some difference. You reacted after all. But that's entirely beside the point.attofishpi wrote:Do YOU make any difference?
Not unless you want me to. But that's also beside the point.attofishpi wrote:Are YOU calling me a fool?
I can see why you might want to have a bit of fun with words, but what has that got to do with god?attofishpi wrote:OOoo... I am honoured and on you 7000th post...
I do love synchronicity!
...and just when im watching Alice in Wonderland
why not?attofishpi wrote:Could our universe be part of a binary simulation? Could God be an Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Does the multiverse exist?
Could an AI God be the result of a technological singularity having occurred aeons ago?
possibly? did the question made any difference in your brain?Notvacka wrote:Possibly. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Could our universe be part of a binary simulation?
would it make us see another new possibility?Depends on how you define God. Would it make any difference?attofishpi wrote:Could God be an Artificial Intelligence (AI)?
there is more possibilities in that too. natural evolution could be the "father" of AI god, or if you dont believe in technological evolution like windows8 or mozilla 3.635 then you can think that man made technology just went autopiloted development and automatic manufacturing. and the "father" of AI god would be stupid little humans, hurray!The problem with an artificial "god", is that it must have been created by somebody else, who would in turn be "god" of the "god". The usual notion of God (with a capital "G") is a being free from any such causality.
you are telling to god what he can do? ok.God can't exist in reality
Because god spelled backwards is dog.[/quote][/quote]John Kelly wrote:[quote="chaz wyman] I can see why you might want to have a bit of fun with words, but what has that got to do with god?
God is supposed to be the creator of our physical universe (reality). In order to create reality, God must exist outside reality. Simple, really.Mark Question wrote:you are telling to god what he can do? ok.God can't exist in reality
i.e. For god to create the universe, god cannot exist.Notvacka wrote:God is supposed to be the creator of our physical universe (reality). In order to create reality, God must exist outside reality. Simple, really.Mark Question wrote:you are telling to god what he can do? ok.God can't exist in reality
For the record (and those not familiar with our prvious debates) I'd like to point out that unlike Chaz I'm a theist. I choose to believe that God exists outside of physical reality. While Chaz equates reality with the whole of existence, I don't. My point is simply that the existence of God can't be proved or disproved from within reality.chaz wyman wrote:i.e. For god to create the universe, god cannot exist.Notvacka wrote:God is supposed to be the creator of our physical universe (reality). In order to create reality, God must exist outside reality. Simple, really.
That clears things up!
Because god spelled backwards is dog.[/quote][/quote]John Kelly wrote:[quote="chaz wyman] I can see why you might want to have a bit of fun with words, but what has that got to do with god?
So you missed the entire point of the project...that these words are unlikely to have formed through natural etymological means. That they were guided into there current form by a panentheistic God.chaz wyman wrote:I can see why you might want to have a bit of fun with words, but what has that got to do with god?