The Minds of Machines

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: The Minds of Machines

Post by Arising_uk »

I agree that P, Q, R ... etc have the meaning of being a variable or place-holder but we were talking about(I thought) the meaning of the terms or words that replace them when reasoning with logic?

Why not use the word "reason" instead of "meaningful thinking"?
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: The Minds of Machines

Post by attofishpi »

Arising_uk wrote:Newtons mechanics will locally stand forever I think..
FYI - I just caught the end of a physics doco where they are looking at the possibility that Newtons law on gravity (the gravitational constant) may need to be revised! It appears to be breaking the physicists hearts at needing to do it. Its in relation to the effect of gravity on extremely large and small scales...the effect not being a constant.
User avatar
Arising_uk
Posts: 12259
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am

Re: The Minds of Machines

Post by Arising_uk »

attofishpi wrote:FYI - I just caught the end of a physics doco where they are looking at the possibility that Newtons law on gravity (the gravitational constant) may need to be revised! It appears to be breaking the physicists hearts at needing to do it. Its in relation to the effect of gravity on extremely large and small scales...the effect not being a constant.
See the word "locally"?
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 13319
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: The Minds of Machines

Post by attofishpi »

Arising_uk wrote:See the word "locally"?
Oh..i was wondering what you meant by that!
Mark Question
Posts: 322
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:20 am

Re: The Minds of Machines

Post by Mark Question »

Arising_uk wrote:I agree that P, Q, R ... etc have the meaning of being a variable or place-holder but we were talking about(I thought) the meaning of the terms or words that replace them when reasoning with logic?

Why not use the word "reason" instead of "meaningful thinking"?
why not use only two words: yes, no?

yes, we were talking about meaning of the terms or words that replace them when reasoning with logic but is your reasoning logical? do you need logically reason also the meaning of the terms or words that replace them when reasoning with logic? so, the meaning of the terms or words that replace them when reasoning with logic, are also logical structures? "the meaning of whatever you replace P or Q with is not contained in Logic" if the meaning is logical structure?
sorry my english. i hope you get my point. or i write some more. :)
Locked