Search found 108 matches
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:50 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
If creating is not possible, the creator can not exist. This law is universal and applies to all Existence. It can't be "universal". It starts with an "IF". Universals aren't conditional. Your "universal law" is just a conditional claim dependent on an unproven premise...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:27 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
I read all of CC's books, and most of his disciples, and all the articles that I could get. I was a big fan until I learned the Big Picture, Karmic Organization, and their dirty work. Nagualism is just another of their religions, in this case, based on magics. Don Juan's stories were very interesti...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:08 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Numbers can be infinite in theory, but not in practice. There is an end to counting them. The last one is the last the counter will be able to count. That's precisely what "infinite" means in practice! Even if you stop counting at N, you could've counted to N+1. For ANY N! I use the terms...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:57 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
OK. Numbers can't be created or destroyed. And they are infinite. Yes, I know. That's called "equivocation". Numbers are not finite - this doesn't mean they are infinite. It just means that you have no reason to believe they are finite. If numbers are finite - what's the last one? It is a...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:54 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
That's faulty reasoning. Why should the laws of the creation apply to the creator? Even if we use your framework - why should the laws of this universe apply to Existence with all of its multiverses? Oooooh! Is that what this is all about? Selling books. Yeah.... even more motivated reasoning. Ther...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:48 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
The funniest part about watching you two fighting and bickering, here, is the irrefutable Fact that the Universe is infinite and eternal, and that this Fact actually proves that a Creator exists. The things that you two are 'trying to' claim, here, actually refute and prove 'your own conclusions an...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:46 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
What do you mean by, 'energy is not infinite', exactly? But, 'energy' is energy, while 'matter' is matter. One is not the other. So, what do you mean by, 'energy equals matter', exactly? God is not 'somebody'. So, if 'nobody' created Existence, Itself, this does not mean that God, as Creator, does ...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:13 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
If this is what you just want to believe is true, then okay. I asked you to, but you obviously did not. So, either you do not have beliefs, or you just can not or do not want to reveal them, here. Of course not. 'I' obviously would have to believe things, to have beliefs, like you do. If you just w...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 9:10 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Numbers are part of the Energy part of Existence; they are eternal, the same as Existence. That means that they can't be created or destroyed. OK. Numbers can't be created or destroyed. And they are infinite. I use the term "constant" in the meaning of "always the same", non-cha...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 8:52 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
I realized that god can't exist based on the 1. law of thermodynamics. That's faulty reasoning. Why should the laws of the creation apply to the creator? Even if we use your framework - why should the laws of this universe apply to Existence with all of its multiverses? Later, I figured out that th...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 8:27 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
If you 'now' saying and claiming that you are not defining nor relating the God word with 'Creator', as "belinda" previously claimed you were, then how are you defining the God word, here, exactly? 'I' do not want to tell 'you' what your beliefs are, so 'I' will let 'you' tell 'us' what '...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 8:25 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
If you are asking me about the price of my books, you can read the e-book versions for free in public libraries.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Oct 28, 2025 11:34 pm $29.99 per question or a flat fee of $49.99 for all. What is your preferred payment processor? (CashApp, Venmo, Zelle, Paypal and all major card accepted.)
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 8:22 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
And what is truly ironic about his insistence that God cannot exist (shades of VA), is that he himself is a potential God who will create and preside over his own personal universe (his own personal "cosmos," to use his word). Srila Prabhupada (the former guru-leader of the Hari Krishnas)...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 7:48 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Please review section 3.b @ http://www.anti-dialectics.co.uk/Rest_of_Summary_of_Twelve.htm#The-Politics-Of-Metaphysics Explain how in the confines of the first egyptian mesopotamian pre-socratic dark age Augustinean Hermetic private cartesian skulls super-empirical concepts generated by the distort...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 7:39 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Well, then, you don't believe in science (because it requires causality), and you don't believe in logic (because maths proves infinite regress impossible), and you don't believe in entropy (because it's a 'clock' on energy redistribution)...and you believe in impossible things instead. You believe...