Philosophy Now Forum

If you could comprehend comprehension, you would be able to figure out how to comprehend god, certainty, being, and output… but how do you do so?

There should be a systematic way of comprehending things and it starts with comprehending comprehension itself!

The brain degrades through lack of proper communication. Memory is all we have.

Impenitent wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:51 am

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Thu Sep 18, 2025 12:43 am Think about not thinking about something. Is it still there?

can you think of nothing? when you think of nothing once more, is it larger?

-Imp

Yes, in what way dies it become “larger”

I mean if you keep adding more and more code until it reaches specified dimensions you’ve achieved the calculation of wonder, but the wonder itself is not calculating

You’d have to calculate calculation to extract it from what you are thinking of…

I guess I got confused between an objects referencing and the referenced… If you have id(x) it represents what points to x x is simply x itself There should be a third “x.rep()” for what x represents To compare and contrast a thought with thinking it Because it’s not saying it that makes it true or ...

Think about not thinking about something. Is it still there?

clarity is when confusion is _____

“question your beliefs, and ask the right questions”

How do you realize things? Do you mean how one perceives things? We come to know the world and its objects by the energy, frequencies, and vibrations the objects are composed of and illuminated by light, which alter some aspect of the standing state of our biology. It is the forces of the outside w...

How do you realize things?

popeye1945 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 01, 2025 3:35 am

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 7:55 pm There’s a difference between applying something and realizing it…

The will, or the state of the will, active or inactive.

Thank you.

There’s a difference between applying something and realizing it…

I am invincibly absolutely certain of nature's (qualitatively) unchangeable eternal infinity. I'm also relatedly invincibly absolutely >certain< that there is no consensual, consilient, warranted, justified, true reason to know anything but nature. That God proves His existence by denying it 110% A...

I think if you took two elements, and introduced them to each other, you should be able to check for the equality of said objects….

So like comparing “best” with “script”

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Mon Jun 23, 2025 5:51 pm 'the answer' to some thing like, 'How can you get from 'uncertainty' to being absolutely 'certain' about some thing'?

This is my question