Search found 16023 matches
- Wed Nov 12, 2025 9:40 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: AI can fake intelligence, but not toxicity
- Replies: 0
- Views: 834
AI can fake intelligence, but not toxicity
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/11/being-too-nice-online-is-a-dead-giveaway-for-ai-bots-study-suggests/ (actual paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04195) When prompted to generate replies to real social media posts from actual users, the AI models struggled to match the level of c...
- Mon Nov 10, 2025 7:46 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Mind
- Topic: Human beings have evolved with the wrong psychological operating system.
- Replies: 9
- Views: 856
Re: Human beings have evolved with the wrong psychological operating system.
So the wrong psychological operating system led you to say/conclude this?
- Fri Nov 07, 2025 10:36 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
So again, what is this "evidence" that Idealism is capable of explaining better than the alternatives? If it's not at least better, then it's not a real objection to anything at all, is it? Well, clearly it hasn't sunk in that the evidence for two or more underdetermined hypotheses is exa...
- Wed Nov 05, 2025 9:26 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Mind
- Topic: Be careful (VA) about what you do with AI
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1407
Re: Be careful (VA) about what you do with AI
The best argument for the continued use of AI is that it annoys people like FlashDangerDork. For me AI is a useful search engine tool, an annoying poison that aggressively autofills VSCode, and sometimes a quick way to get a summary to help me remember which author I am attempting to paraphrase. But...
- Wed Nov 05, 2025 9:21 am
- Forum: Philosophy of Science
- Topic: Are Scientific Theories True?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 695
Re: Are Scientific Theories True?
Realism claims that scientific theories describe the world as it truly is, including both observable and unobservable things. Constructive empiricism, on the other hand, teaches that the real aim of science is empirical adequacy—that a theory should fit what can be observed, not necessarily what ex...
- Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:40 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
You could have, but you didn't. There is a finite sum of parts in Energy. One day, in a distant future, we will come to the last unexperienced experience. In that moment, we will experience Everything that exists. To continue, we will start by repeating some of our past experiences in circles. Afte...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 12:16 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
If creating is not possible, the creator can not exist. This law is universal and applies to all Existence. It can't be "universal". It starts with an "IF". Universals aren't conditional. Your "universal law" is just a conditional claim dependent on an unproven premise...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 12:12 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Numbers can be infinite in theory, but not in practice. There is an end to counting them. The last one is the last the counter will be able to count. That's precisely what "infinite" means in practice! Even if you stop counting at N, you could've counted to N+1. For ANY N! I use the terms...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 8:00 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Numbers are part of the Energy part of Existence; they are eternal, the same as Existence. That means that they can't be created or destroyed. OK. Numbers can't be created or destroyed. And they are infinite. I use the term "constant" in the meaning of "always the same", non-cha...
- Wed Oct 29, 2025 7:51 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
I realized that god can't exist based on the 1. law of thermodynamics. That's faulty reasoning. Why should the laws of the creation apply to the creator? Even if we use your framework - why should the laws of this universe apply to Existence with all of its multiverses? Later, I figured out that th...
- Tue Oct 28, 2025 12:00 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Like having hands?Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 28, 2025 11:23 amBy having one.Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:06 amHow did he prove that there is a thought?Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:03 am Descartes failed to prove anything other than that there is thought.
- Tue Oct 28, 2025 10:06 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Descartes failed to prove anything other than that there is thought. How did he prove that there is a thought? It may be, as idealists believe, that is all there is, which has an elegant parsimony, and is irrefutable, which, to be clear, doesn't make it true. There is no such burden of proof. Scept...
- Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:32 am
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Energy can't be created or destroyed. Can numbers be created or destroyed? That means that there is a constant amount of Energy. That means that there is a constant amount of numbers. That means that it is not infinite. Non-sequitur. Constant doesn't imply non-infinite. Nor does it imply finite. It...
- Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:07 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
I have a body. Which I believe, but prove it. If you specify the methodology via which you proved (to yourself) that you "cogito" you could trivially extend it to "here's one hand. And here's another". Even if solipsism is true - you still have hands. Relocate them to whatever o...
- Mon Oct 27, 2025 8:31 pm
- Forum: General Philosophical Discussion
- Topic: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
- Replies: 902
- Views: 14831
Re: The first valid evidence that god does NOT exist
Existence as a whole is not infinite because that is not possible. Maybe it's possible. Maybe it's not. Anything you can't exhaust is effectively infinite. You can't be sure it's finite until you get to the end of it. Energy, a part of Existence, is finite. How do you know that? Have you exhausted ...