The Philosophy Discussion Forum

... Negation is parasitic on that which it negates. So congratulations. You've doubled down on vacuity and you've made it your identity. So you are a parasite by your own standards by attempting to negate the claims of the text? And same with the identity laws? I see no logic here on your part, jus...

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 27, 2026 6:18 pm ...

Negation is parasitic on that which it negates.

So congratulations. You've doubled down on vacuity and you've made it your identity.

If by "blah, blah, blah" you mean recursion, then apparently you see the fundamental limits of your own intellect and realize even your claims resort to empty tautological loops. A tautology is a statement which is true in all possible interpretations. i.e its negation is not true in all ...

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 23, 2026 9:37 pm blah blah blah

That was quite the diatribe. Why so negative, dawg?

Unification is distinct. Talking about negation/conflict/etc. is distinct. Your assertions and skepticism are distinct. Claiming something indistinct is distinct from distinction thus allows distinction to be distinct by the distinction of 'indistinct'. Do you have anything else you wish to complai...

No error, no externalization, just awareness of the limits of what you claim. And yet blissfully unaware of your misunderstanding. A cognitive operation is subject to being a distinction, so is a non-cognitive operation. What remains is the event of distinction. Then do a different operation. Disti...

There really is no point debating morons who argue from perfectionism. Well, Mr Can, being Mr Can, will be squealing with glee, because the porridge between his ears has turned that into 'Skepdick thinks I'm perfect.' That would be glaringly obvious to all, were we to travel to some unspecified loc...

I know Socialists have dyslexia when it comes to money. They think it "just appears," or "government creates it." But they can't wish it into existence. So opinions are not the question. Rather, it depends on how many people the "universal" system has to serve, and wit...

Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Jun 13, 2026 5:00 pm Health care is an unsolvable problem...

There really is no point debating morons who argue from perfectionism. All problems are unsolvable if you expect absolute solutions.

Perfect is the enemy of good.

"The lack of well-behaved semantics" is a negation hence you are speaking less about negation, as you are using it, and more about the limits of your own language. That's false. Negation is absent in that expression. You are translating my expression into a negated paraphrase, then using ...

"The lack of well-behaved semantics" is a negation hence you are speaking less about negation, as you are using it, and more about the limits of your own language. That's false. Negation is absent in that expression. You are translating my expression into a negated paraphrase, then using ...

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 09, 2026 10:32 pm Negation of Classical Identity Laws Using Classical Identity Laws.

Negation is ill-defined - it lacks well-behaved semantics. Said simply: negation is meaningless.

Distinctions, and the distinction of assumptions as assumptions from non-assumptions, thus distinction remains invariant. Do you have any idea of what your skepticism is without the skepticism of your skepticism? Or are you just skeptical when it is convenient to your personal narrative? I have no ...

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Jun 21, 2026 1:53 am Noticed Fairy, Promethean, and Skepdick seem to have found their ways back. Welcome back, guys (and gal)!

Against my better judgment... I lurked without logging in since February.

Only if to annoy FlashDangerDork, I regret my absence.

I would not be as generous as you are, this is given the same logic they claim is true is the same logic that argue to derive truth thus logic is effectively deriving itself as nested assumptions within assumptions. Logic is self-embedding assumptions. It is an ourobos of the psyche. I have no idea...