Page 1 of 1

'Nocreation' is the (non)choice ... but just for a while

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:50 pm
by FrankGSterleJr
Congratulations, Nobody’s Going to Have a Baby … Not for a Very Long Time

At the time, most Earth folk would’ve admitted that their planet, specifically its wholly contaminated eco-system and grotesquely massive overpopulation, was extremely befouled. Not at all surprising, the ethically and morally corrupt societal standards significantly abused the most basic of human rights, and the political realm as well as its adjoined bureaucracy were just as debased as the planet’s life-sustaining environment.
Even as dire the global survivability situation indeed was, the planet’s collectively actively procreative human race was still not adequately concerned in order to actively rectify their extremely messed up world.
The planet’s people weren’t even prepared to noticeably remedy their malicious behavior—towards one another and in particular to helpless animals, both wild and domesticated—let alone to proactively halt their blatant abuse of their own world, Spaceship Earth.
As for their rapid gross over-population humanity’s dangerous reactionary response was, "But why should any of us deny ourselves the right to have families of our own?" As a whole, humanity simply was not willing to constrain its rate of reproductivity. Such constraint would plainly have to be forced upon the entire populace.
Inevitably precisely such was indeed forced upon all fertile people; and ironically it was enforced by the human race itself—albeit highly advanced and vastly evolved ‘humans’ from thirty-five million years into their own future (in the present commonly referred to as greys.)
In every timeline the greys sent many of their evolved-human kind back into their distant past, to the very beginning of the third millennium A.D. on Earth, to temporarily sterilize every fertile human being on the planet, for a three thousand year period.
It was not as though procreative-minded adults, however much they loved children, are performing any favors or charitable acts whatsoever by bringing sentient offspring into a world that’s so prone to great suffering. In actuality, it is the most selfish act in the purely natural sphere of human existence, though admittedly one involving the propagation of the human species and even more so the instinctual compulsion to continue one’s own genetic lineage.
But to be thorough and fair in regards to this most profound aspect of the human equation, it is with irony that simultaneously it is also a parent’s most selfless long-term act to responsibly functionally rear his or her offspring, especially in such difficult socially dysfunctional surroundings.
With the sterilization fully implemented the infertile status remained so until the planet’s life forms and ecology, in their entirety without any exception, eventually fully revived and thoroughly thrived as a truly living planet, again.
To allow human procreation to continue unabated at its current stubbornly high rate—especially in the poorest undeveloped, and even developing, regions of the globe—would translate into yet even far greater suffering than that already dreadfully endured.
Irregardless of mass human protests, the greys’ proclaimed inability to freely answer the most troubling three-part question—‘Why is it so vital to cease without a single exception all natural human procreation, at this specific point in time and for three thousand years to come?’—couldn’t be allowed to act as a hindrance to their plan immediately moving forward; otherwise, in only about two centuries the near extinction of the human race was an imminent inevitability.
To do otherwise, the greys strongly implied, “would disable the refreshing process.”
The end to the prevailing toxification within both human nature and your dying home, your entire world, will only begin with the purification of new human life, the greys telepathically communicated. That is all we can say.
Along the millions of years towards their own present day, the greys had discovered not only how to fold space thus enabling them to travel vast stellar distances in but a few moments’ time, yet also the means of folding time itself thus breaking the temporal barrier in either arrow’s-time direction.
It resultantly would require them to travel a meager five thousand miles distance from the surface of Earth, their home planet, in order to safely fold time. Doing so enabled them to access what year-2015 physicists referred to as the fourth dimension—which the greys learned it in fact was, albeit in a somewhat different context than that theorized by their distant predecessor scientists—without inadvertently yet nonetheless disastrously creating a paradox in a temporal causality loop.
Upon their arrival into the distant past the greys calmly rationally explained via telepathy to humanity its great predicament and provided evidence of impending dire outcomes, all culminating in a final major almost-successful near-extinction. They then without physical forcefulness, though in secret, genetically contaminated all sources of drinking water on the planet, the effect of which immediately rendered sterile all human sperm and ovum within three months.
There was another large question yet to be answered for the humans, however. “But with no new human life, who’ll perform all of the ‘detoxifying’ along with other crucial immense changes to humanity and our eco-systems, etcetera?” a high-level United Nations official queried the greys.
The greys mentally explained that, Utilizing the plentiful supply of fertile sperm and ovum already in refrigeration at fertility clinics around the globe human newborns will be prudently reproduced through artificial conception and gestation. During artificial gestation the fetus will be genetically enhanced in order to, most notably, advance their intellectual abilities; although, they will be just as ‘adorable’ as they have always been in humanity’s past and present as well as in the distant future—and in so many cases of such artificial procreation, even more so ‘adorable’ than ever before. As infants they can be nurtured by their biological parent-donors, whom we can rapidly identify through clinic records and DNA sequencing. If the infants’ parent-donors desire no involvement in their artificially procreated offspring we will quite willingly perform the entire nurturing process and with anticipated successful outcomes. All said and done, the resultant children of light will be the ones who will save you and your once-pristine planet.
For what it was worth to current humanity, the greys promised to prove that they’d long ago exceeded the medical and scientific means to reliably change an otherwise near-extinction inevitability into what was in the peaceable best interests of all involved. They sincerely reassured 2015 AD humanity that in three thousand years humanity and Earth will be remade to exist as both were always meant to exist; they will be refreshed in the most profound and prolifically progressive aspect of the term.
But even with our vast advancements in medicine and science, the greys again communicated, we still cannot avoid the necessity of temporarily sterilizing the human race—you, as we once were—for a relatively short period of time in order for the refreshing to occur. Please try to allow yourselves to feel great encouragement, for your procreative fasting will inevitably result in an abundance of genuine flourishing appreciation and adoration towards all things natural on Earth, but most importantly the youngest, most vulnerable members of your species.
The greys had strongly emphasized they well sensed and understood that their explanations about and justifications for the implementation of the refreshing process came across to very many people as being a bit too platitudinously warm and fuzzy for their comfort. Nevertheless, the greys could only offer their own history records which reasoned that the humans’ crucial course change of their existence was precisely equal in immense importance to that of the greys.
Henceforth the refreshment transition was set to continue for three millennia, a point at which all, as anticipated and promised, had become as they were persistently intended.
When the greys eventually left 2015 Earth in their travel craft they folded time at the exact point in space of their arrival (almost five months prior), that being just over five thousand miles from Earth’s surface.


Afterthought: What came first—the chicken or the egg? Would not logic dictate that humanity must have gotten along well enough on its own in order for the greys—who are in entirety vastly evolved human beings—to have come into such amazingly brilliant existence? More so, how could have a very small group of contemporary naturally-born humans survived near-extinction and then evolved into greys who then travelled back into the past to spare their ancient human ancestors from the bare-miss extinction, even though it was perhaps that very near-extinction that had resulted in such vast human evolution and precisely which then specifically culminated in the “refreshing” concept and time-travel mission?
Unlike with The Terminator movies in which man and machine from the future time-travel into the past to prevent or ensure (depending on allegiance) Judgment Day, though all of which only manages to maintain the continuance of a consistent causality loop, the greys’ human-sterilizing efforts could only produce a by-definition example of a paradox.
According to current laws of temporal physics the sole two ways through which the greys may have managed to successfully ‘change the past’ while simultaneously avoid a paradox would be: first, to either have ‘made their changes’ as a consistent part of the original causality loop; or second, to have created an alternate reality or the means to have shifted into a parallel universe that would already be consistent with the enormous changes that the greys have made.

Re: 'Nocreation' is the (non)choice ... but just for a while

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:18 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
:?:

Re: 'Nocreation' is the (non)choice ... but just for a while

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 1:52 am
by sideshow
FrankGSterleJr wrote: A yet another unconventional means of expressing an philisophical concept ...
What came first—the chicken or the egg?
This indeed is an excellent philosophical way of expressing that neither one nor the other could have come first, therefore, as they must have evolved together, the answer has to be "both".

vegetariantaxidermy:
We have a lot in common. I just love stuffed veggies. Cabbages, bell peppers, tomatoes, grape leaves, olives.

Re: 'Nocreation' is the (non)choice ... but just for a while

Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 3:27 pm
by thedoc
sideshow wrote:
FrankGSterleJr wrote: A yet another unconventional means of expressing an philisophical concept ...
What came first—the chicken or the egg?
This indeed is an excellent philosophical way of expressing that neither one nor the other could have come first, therefore, as they must have evolved together, the answer has to be "both".

Granted the whole 'Chicken and Egg' question is symbolic of other processes, but from a biological stand point it is meaningless. Obviously the egg came first because the creature that hatched from the egg is genetically identical to the creature that grew inside the egg. There is no way for the creature to magically change at the moment of hatching. Hint; you don't need a chicken to lay the egg that will hatch into a chicken.

Re: 'Nocreation' is the (non)choice ... but just for a while

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:28 am
by sideshow
thedoc wrote: Granted the whole 'Chicken and Egg' question is symbolic of other processes, but from a biological stand point it is meaningless. Obviously the egg came first because the creature that hatched from the egg is genetically identical to the creature that grew inside the egg. There is no way for the creature to magically change at the moment of hatching. Hint; you don't need a chicken to lay the egg that will hatch into a chicken.
Hi doc, thanks for your comment!

The trick is to unscramble whether we mean one particular egg or all eggs of one kind. One egg is always inextricably tied to the one set of parents and then later to its chicks in an endless chain.

Biologically, evolution doesn't do one egg at a time, because multiple generations of many chickens are needed to make it work, small steps each time. A genetic variant bird too far from the parents either can't survive or can't reproduce. So a whole micro-population has to evolve, all together, to make a new viable species.

Re: 'Nocreation' is the (non)choice ... but just for a while

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:29 am
by thedoc
sideshow wrote:
thedoc wrote: Granted the whole 'Chicken and Egg' question is symbolic of other processes, but from a biological stand point it is meaningless. Obviously the egg came first because the creature that hatched from the egg is genetically identical to the creature that grew inside the egg. There is no way for the creature to magically change at the moment of hatching. Hint; you don't need a chicken to lay the egg that will hatch into a chicken.
Hi doc, thanks for your comment!

The trick is to unscramble whether we mean one particular egg or all eggs of one kind. One egg is always inextricably tied to the one set of parents and then later to its chicks in an endless chain.

Biologically, evolution doesn't do one egg at a time, because multiple generations of many chickens are needed to make it work, small steps each time. A genetic variant bird too far from the parents either can't survive or can't reproduce. So a whole micro-population has to evolve, all together, to make a new viable species.
All true, and the trick is to determine when a particular bird is a chicken or not a chicken, and the complicated part is that over a large population some areas may evolve before others and the genetic change spreads throughout the whole population. The other possibility is of cross breading of a viable offspring that happens often enough to become a viable new species. So that defining line seperating chickens, from not quite chickens, can be quite crooked and spread out over several generations, and the old line could survive along side the new line of chickens, each filling a particular niche.

All that being said, I will add that I was addressing the old nonsense, which I have heard debated ad nauseam, that somehow the chicken hatching from the egg could be different from the creature inside the egg. The whole argument revolved around the idea that, for some reason you had to have a 'chicken' to lay an egg that would hatch a chicken, and biologically you only needed a bird that was 'almost' a chicken to do that.

Re: 'Nocreation' is the (non)choice ... but just for a while

Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:39 am
by thedoc
Sorry for the rant, but the 'Chicken and Egg' nonsense is just a bit of a sore subject for me, in that people are constantly useing it to illustrate some inapropriate point. One of the other pet peeves is the misuse of the word 'Myth'.