Philosophy Now Forum

I have discovered an important observation today.
The female specie of humans has readily apparent health markers for reproductive fitness. A female with wide hips, large breasts, and clear skin, demonstrates a healthy standard for bearing and rearing children. Facial beauty and symmetry is a non-factor, compared to these bodily traits of mothering children.

However, the male specie, has no readily apparent health markers for reproductive fitness. further, there is no indication that men will stay and rear their own children, or offer them resources. This is opposite of the female specie. The female specie, with large breasts, connects a physical human trait, with a behavior of motherly instinct. Large breasts are intended to provide fuller and plentiful milk to infants. This indicates loyalty and resource allocated to biological children.
Males do not have any of these physical indications. A male may stay and rear his own children, or leave. Females do not have this option, and the physical trait of large breasts betrays even the possibility. Her large breasts are proof, that she is genetically inclined to stay and rear children, and many children in fact. This motherly, physical trait, has reproductive value. A man has none.

Not even a physically dominant male, who is tall, strong, and aggressive, indicates any reproductive support, in the realm of child resources and rearing. Loyalty to children, and the probability for family, is non existent in the physical traits of men. They are completely behavioral, and not genetic.
There are valuable conclusions to be derived from this observation.

Are you an expert on women or soemthing? i see you talk about them a lot.

You are the master, Blix. You are my authority, my wise sage, my expert, my guide to knowledge. I implore you, Blix, teach me your wise ways!
I bow before your awesomeness.

lol. No, im being serious. I was wondering if you were because I had some questions I wanted to ask you.

Atthet wrote:You are the master, Blix. You are my authority, my wise sage, my expert, my guide to knowledge. I implore you, Blix, teach me your wise ways!
I bow before your awesomeness.

Sarcasm is the lowest form of 'wit'. Do you engage with people like that face to face? I'm thinking not. You would probably be dead by now. I don't see what makes the internet so different. Is it because humans really hate each other underneath all the facade, and the internet allows them to vent?

Blix wrote:lol. No, im being serious. I was wondering if you were because I had some questions I wanted to ask you.

I am knowledgeable about males, so I subtract what I know about myself, and then I use this equation to describe females.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Sarcasm is the lowest form of 'wit'. Do you engage with people like that face to face? I'm thinking not. You would probably be dead by now.

Nonsense, my darling princess, I wouldn't be dead by now, because I have your devotion and care to protect me?

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:I don't see what makes the internet so different. Is it because humans really hate each other underneath all the facade, and the internet allows them to vent?

You should ask this in the "sentimentality" thread, it's an interesting question, and I admire you for asking it, princess. Yes, humans do hate each other, and the internet allows a few drips of honesty through the filters. Truth is, people would probably eat each other, if they weren't culled by morality for thousands of years. When you unlock the chains that bind an individual's soul, one by one, then you get to see each human's animal spirit erupt, and explode.
It's quite amusing actually, have you seen this before? I have

Shows how tenuous and fragile 'civilisation' is but the upside is that the bullying cunts seem to be in the minority, (they just make a lot of noise and get noticed).

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Shows how tenuous and fragile 'civilisation' is but the upside is that the bullying cunts seem to be in the minority, (they just make a lot of noise and get noticed).

My princess, I've been thinking about something lately. I've been thinking about what it must feel like for an innocent girl to be confronted by a dominant, intimidating, aggressive man, who reeks of lust for her sex. He molests her, annoys her, spanks her ass, harasses her to no end. But, she's defenseless, what can she do?
And part of her....her animal nature, is actually turned on by this. Doesn't she want this attention, negative and "evil" as Judeo-Christians label it? Doesn't she want his hands to slip through her soft clothing, to clutch her breasts underneath? Doesn't she want to be controlled, and dominated, by the top male? Doesn't she accept this, even though she is scared and afraid, at first, paralyzed by a fear that she cannot trust him?

Doesn't she want it, my princess? Isn't this unwanted touching and sexual harassment, a form of bullying?
What if it's actually wanted, and demanded, by innocent, young girls? What if they, ultimately, demand this invasion of their most private area of body?

Atthet wrote:

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Shows how tenuous and fragile 'civilisation' is but the upside is that the bullying cunts seem to be in the minority, (they just make a lot of noise and get noticed).

My princess, I've been thinking about something lately. I've been thinking about what it must feel like for an innocent girl to be confronted by a dominant, intimidating, aggressive man, who reeks of lust for her sex. He molests her, annoys her, spanks her ass, harasses her to no end. But, she's defenseless, what can she do?
And part of her....her animal nature, is actually turned on by this. Doesn't she want this attention, negative and "evil" as Judeo-Christians label it? Doesn't she want his hands to slip through her soft clothing, to clutch her breasts underneath? Doesn't she want to be controlled, and dominated, by the top male? Doesn't she accept this, even though she is scared and afraid, at first, paralyzed by a fear that she cannot trust him?

Doesn't she want it, my princess? Isn't this unwanted touching and sexual harassment, a form of bullying?
What if it's actually wanted, and demanded, by innocent, young girls? What if they, ultimately, demand this invasion of their most private area of body?

I couldn't possibly comment.

Atthet:

When you unlock the chains that bind an individual's soul

Because of your sentimentalist intoxication, you believe all people have a soul. Prove it.

reasonvemotion wrote:Because of your sentimentalist intoxication, you believe all people have a soul. Prove it.

Did I say all people have a soul? What did I say? Didn't I say an individual's soul?
Are you an individual, allemotion? Are you independent? Or, does a part of you, deep down inside, still depend on a man? Don't you depend on a top male, to invade your body, and give you purpose?

My princess, I've been thinking about something lately. I've been thinking about what it must feel like for an innocent girl to be confronted by a dominant, intimidating, aggressive man, who reeks of lust for her sex. He molests her, annoys her, spanks her ass, harasses her to no end. But, she's defenseless, what can she do?
And part of her....her animal nature, is actually turned on by this. Doesn't she want this attention, negative and "evil" as Judeo-Christians label it? Doesn't she want his hands to slip through her soft clothing, to clutch her breasts underneath? Doesn't she want to be controlled, and dominated, by the top male? Doesn't she accept this, even though she is scared and afraid, at first, paralyzed by a fear that she cannot trust him?

Doesn't she want it, my princess? Isn't this unwanted touching and sexual harassment, a form of bullying?
What if it's actually wanted, and demanded, by innocent, young girls? What if they, ultimately, demand this invasion of their most private area of body?

[/quote


Will someone take this thing back to where he or she belongs. "Know Thyself"

reasonvemotion wrote:Will someone take this thing back to where he or she belongs. "Know Thyself"

Did I offend your sensibility, your sentiments, darling? I'm sorry. You need to forgive me, allemotion, because I care about you, and you specifically.
I wonder what makes you so adverse to this passage. Isn't it invasive? Doesn't it suggest a type of trespass that goes beyond superficiality? Isn't it a complete loss of privacy, when somebody knows your essence, inside and out?

How else can we know human nature, and philosophy, except to expose the darkest secrets of all?
Tell me, please? Please

When you unlock the chains that bind an individual's soul

Prove that statement that an "individual" has a soul. You wrote it, you believe it and if you believe it you must substantiate it. I am waiting.