Twat wrote:If this is the case then I think it the bastardized American Feminism that imported its own cultural issues into what was simply the case for equal payment for doing the same job. Not that it even achieved that.
Dear, imbecile, I work in a job which is physically demanding. Females are routinely called in to do the same job for the same pay, but being unable to do it the men, me included, have to pick up the slack.
So, we are supposed to do the same job for the same pay but they cannot, therefore males, being the noble knights, are looked upon to do "what is right"...in other words preserve the illusion that cunts, like you, can do the exact same job in the exact same way...when all that is done is that we get paid the same.
Twat wrote:That'd be setting my sights a bit low I think but then I don't believe in "equality" per se, just equality of opportunity.
What a euphemism for lowering the bar so that niggers can be included and fill in some quota that supposedly proves how "open minded" and "fair" we are.
like those females at my work. They sued the institution to get the "right" to do my job...and then most of them either could not or insisted knowing that males would help them.
To include niggers in the social fabric, dear, they lower the testing standards.
Twat wrote:No, I'm saying that if a female can do the same job then they should get the same pay.
"If" being the operative term, twat.
Twat wrote:More fool your place then. Although I've worked in places where men slack and other men have to pick it up so nothing new there.
Laziness is not the same as incompetence, moron.
Twat wrote:Don't have it over here.
Oh but you will moron, you will. You might already have it under a different name...like "equal pay for equal work".
Twat wrote:You have to take an IQ test to be educated over there? Given that one can improve ones IQ by taking and studying for the tests I think them not much of a guide, especially since this difference can be explained by cultural factors.
The typical liberal twang, you ****.
Culture, another way of saying "nurture".
Moron, it's been decades of integration where do niggers reach parity, except in forced inclusion and forced social behavioral standards which inhibit greatness so that niggers and females do not get left out.
Other "visible minorities" don't seem to be as affected by culture, retard.
It must be something innate.
How does culture explain why there has never been a civilization on the level of a European or Asian one in the sub-Saharan region?
How does culture explain that no n*****, or female, has ever created or invented or thought of an idea that revolutionized mankind and man's thinking?
Let's give it a few more centuries, shall we? By then race mixing and globalization would have done its magic and parity would be a fact.
There's nothing like diluting gold in stone to achieve uniform crap.
Twat wrote:But lets say they are, would you support an increase in the Asian and Indian student population over the Europeans?
I would support superiority.
By the way, retard, Asians have higher I.Q. scores than Europeans and Indians are part of the Indo-European race.
I know you think you know where I'm coming from, but given your performances so far, you are definitely clueless.
You are just a mindless moron, hell-bent on preserving the ideal she benefits from, only focusing on the pluses and not on the potential minuses.
Twat wrote:As they regularly score higher than the European. I think you judge the Black Man by the White Man's history as recent history shows the Black Man to be much gentler than was to be expected.
Really twat?
Have you seen the statistics on prison populations?
But, moron, when you train an animal to eat with a fork and to wear pajamas and to shit in the toilet, it does not stop being a chimp...you just did a good job training it to behave in accordance to how you think a human should behave.
Take away the master and see how fast it reverts to shitting on the carpet, eating with its hands and going buck naked.
Watch riots...how many niggers do you see amongst the looters?
Twat wrote:
We've had delinquents since the get go. What feminism has to do with blacks I have no idea?
The same principles that freed the black man are the ones that liberated females. It's the same Judeo-Christian, nihilistic, anti-nature crap, which is also behind communism and this Venus Project shit and your Liberalism, retard.
Same shit: all equal under God or state or King.
Twat wrote:But LMAO that you think its destroyed the 'family unit', which one?
Twat, females in natural environments supported each other in raising the young. Then the modern lifestyles began with the extended family formed around the pair-bonding of heterosexuality: father/mother...grandparents and children.
In paganism the family extended further.
With this method of divide and conquer the family structure was twiddled down to the nuclear family...one father, one mother, children. Everyone else excluded. The female became more dependent on the male because she had no female support.
Now we go further...reproduction is no longer even a factor. Two women and their cats= family ....two ass-jockeys adopting a poor child = family.
One woman and her partner=family.
It's all down to ONE...with all else being add-on accessories, replaceable parts. Take
nozzle b insert in hose A or then discard
nozzle B and choose
nozzle c, insert again.
There is no family...we are all supposed to be married to Jesus and if not Him then to the State...we must be career oriented and productive consumers. this is our family.
Twat wrote:The extended unit that used to exist or the nuclear one that is now having its end. I think Marx had a better explanation for this, in modern industrial/technological countries the means of production do not require such units any more. Although it looks like some form of extended matriarchal unit is arising to cope with the loss and confusion as to the male role in the modern work place.
Marx was the first sing of
Modernity, twat.
No coincidence that Marx, like Jesus, was a Jew...and how many Jews are bankers?
The pagan, more natural, man, was infected back in Rome, twat. Since then its been a slow retreat towards uniform nothing.
Some even deny that sex evolved to reproduce a species.
Presumably it evolved for our pleasure...secular hedonism raised to the status God's benevolence.
Twat wrote:Think not, it started with a big-bang in mind.
No shit?
Reminds me of the presumption infecting science today.
The only singular
Big Bang that happened was the one you hope for in your head when you see Levy.
Twat wrote:Note that its us who's doing the looking.
Is it Jeebus?
Twat wrote:How do you explain the changing nature of what is considered beautiful in women over the ages and cultures?
The appreciation of symmetry never changed, twat...all that change is girth. the 7/10 rule still applied, but size means wealth or comfort, just as pale skin did.
Natural standards apply, twat...what form they take within each culture is what changes. Like how sexual roles became gender roles. This does not mean that there is no specialization and division of labor in nature, imbecile, only that men take it, adapt it to their own needs, give it symbols and behavioral standards which directs libidinal energies towards productive, to the system, avenues.
See, your "equality of pay" is just the next step towards integrating half the productive population into labor slavishness.
In the past females were more productive as birthing machines that also maintained a home for the male to feel comfortable in. It was the male's investment in the system.
Now, in a world of 7 billion and with fertilizing technologies on the ready this is no longer necessary. Now females must be returned to servitude next to males...They actually make better workers because they never question why they work or where or how...and their entire identity is built upon servitude.
Twat wrote:Are red apples dangerous? Are green bananas tasty? Are blackberries inferior?
Oh twat...so banal.
Fitness is superior.
It depends on your standard, right?
If big muscles are your standard and not big brains then your conception of superior might be different. but does nature care?
Who dominates in a world where big muscles compete against big brains, with no outside interference?
Appearance, dumb-ass, is not only visual. When i taste I perceive a divergence, which is coupled with all my other senses to create an appearance....which is not accidental nor superficial...you twat.
Niggers are not niggers only because of their skin pigmentation, you imbecile. It is how they smell, move, think, form, sound etc. you do not say that an apple is different from a pair because of its color only.
It is equality which is a human construct, twat....and work parity is also a human construct.
Twat wrote:Where do I show such expectations? Can your thought also apply to the wanker who can take advantage of distance to say things he'd not to anothers face?
Why do you assume I would not...after I was done vomiting?
Twat, that I am forced to abide by social conventions because my survival depends on it does not make anything I've said less true.
If I cannot tell a n***** what he is, to his face, does this make him less of a n***** or does it dismiss what he is?
Twat wrote: Although you are right in one instance as I think equality of opportunity is something that should be enforced as due to us being unequal we are wasting possibilities through nepotism.
Twat, nepotism is a result of organized human systems which take advantage of morons, like you.
There is no nepotism in nature.
Genetics offer you a potential, an advantage...they do not ensure that you are successful with them.
Twat wrote: Would we be raping if we lived in a nudist world?
Twats like you assume that views must be preferences...because they are for twats like you.
I do not construct my opinions based no what I like or prefer, twat. I construct them on what I perceive.
But if rape were an option, how "loud mouthed" would you be? How many of your "rights" would you bitch about?
It's the big bad Paternalistic system that ensures that men cannot take advantage of your inferiority.
Twat wrote: I give two fucks about the death of species as 99% of all species that have ever lived are extinct so whats new. But yes, I like my countryside free from things that can kill me. Now I guess you'd say that this makes me less than a man but I doubt you'd go into your wilderness without a gun.
A park is not nature, twat. Once more you confuse preference to reality.
I prefer to be immortal; I prefer to be able to fly with no technological aids; I prefer a home in Fiji; I wish money grew on trees and lambs slaughtered themselves.
How fuckin' stupid are you people?
Twat, have you even considered what the collateral effects of your "safety and comfort and sheltering" are, or is it all a win-win situation with you and your twat clan?
Twat wrote: You are now having a 'purpose' to Evolution? You think that a homosexual having sex with a women produces a homosexual!?
Oh my, you are reaching now, aren't you Twat. Am I a christian conservative, Twat?
Twat, sex is a natural mechanism...why does it evolve?
Is it so you and your lesbian friends can rub clits together or is it for your faggot father to stick a penis into the orifice he defecates from?
Twat, whatever genetic weaknesses exist in a bloodline to make homosexuality come about, with the help of environmental conditions, are passed on...basic genetics, Twat.
A family tree with down-syndrome in it has an increase potential to produce a down-syndrome child...and a faggot in the family means that a faggot might come about again.
Twat wrote: Point out the paedophiles who have invented such gadgets? Homosexuals appear to be very creative compared to the paedophile.
How prejudiced of you twat.
Can pedophiles admit they are so?
I think you might be surprised about how many "creative geniuses" - using your standards, like boy asshole or look upon prepubescent girls with a twinkle...your doctor might be one of them. How naive are you, twat?
Imagine a world where not even bestiality was frowned upon and a family could be reinvented to include household pets...how nice that would be; imagine how many of your neighbors would come out of the closet.
Twat wrote:Not quite, I'm a primate who likes eating cows whereas you are an acclaimed ruminant who prefers grass like your fellow cows.
No, you are all bovine, twat....100% beef.
Twat wrote: What has that got to do with Mimesis? Who took away this 'right' of the Downs Syndrome person in the first place? Are you saying that someone is actually enforcing a child upon a Downs Syndrome person?
is that what I said?
Twat, when your retarded mommy and your screwed-up, douche-bag, effete daddy copulated, did not all consider it their "right" to bear children?
Whee in nature is there an animal with such divine rights?
Cannot a retard, a cripple, a persona suffering from a rare disease have children and will he not be supported in doing so?
Twat wrote:Or he or she may revolutionise Physics or invent Computers.
Yes...lets tolerate a billion apes, like you, smashing on typewriter keys in the hope that eventually a great work of art will be produced...but they will never know it, for they are just smashing away mindlessly.
Twat, the idea that intelligence springs out randomly is what makes you feel hopeful about your own blood.
Perhaps copulating with a gorilla will be the next step...since if we add the typist primates and canines and cats and all the beast in nature then something brilliant might come about...by accident.
