Philosophy Now Forum

dividedforlovessake wrote:Everything in life perplexes me. Maybe I am too stupid to understand common sense so I look reasons and arguments when other people say they don't need it.

My biggest interests are in religion and sex. I would like to be able to one day read Kant so I can finally be relieved of the need to find a philosophical justification for belief in God.

I also like Freud, Jung, Structuralism, Marx, continental philosophy, etc.

I wish English philosophy was deeper but then I wish continental philosophy was clearer.

Recently the religious implications of Quantum theory and synchrinicity theory of Jung have picqued my interest.

I think too much but I tried hardcore zen Buddhist meditation for a month in Plum Village with Thich Nhat Hanh and it did noohing for me.

dividedforlovessake wrote:Everything in life perplexes me. Maybe I am too stupid to understand common sense so I look reasons and arguments when other people say they don't need it. .

dividedforlovessake wrote:Recently the religious implications of Quantum theory and synchrinicity theory of Jung have picqued my interest.

chaz wyman wrote:

dividedforlovessake wrote:Everything in life perplexes me. Maybe I am too stupid to understand common sense so I look reasons and arguments when other people say they don't need it.

My biggest interests are in religion and sex. I would like to be able to one day read Kant so I can finally be relieved of the need to find a philosophical justification for belief in God.

I also like Freud, Jung, Structuralism, Marx, continental philosophy, etc.

I wish English philosophy was deeper but then I wish continental philosophy was clearer.

Recently the religious implications of Quantum theory and synchrinicity theory of Jung have picqued my interest.

I think too much but I tried hardcore zen Buddhist meditation for a month in Plum Village with Thich Nhat Hanh and it did noohing for me.

Don't run away with the idea that there are any religious implications for QM, there are none. That sort of "philosophy" is for the coffee table and the Fortean magazine.
As far as I can tell the only justification for God in Kant is that he found it hard to conceive of a moral world in which there was no God. I feel that if he had known Darwin, Kant would have moved towards a Spinozan God or gone to atheism.

dividedforlovessake wrote:I would list all the thinkers in Quantu
Theory that believed in it's religious implications but it would be too tedious. Most of the founders of QM found religious

Yes, far too tedious!!!

Okay name ONE scientist that thinks QM has any religious implications!!



implications in it.

chaz wyman wrote:

dividedforlovessake wrote:Everything in life perplexes me. Maybe I am too stupid to understand common sense so I look reasons and arguments when other people say they don't need it.

My biggest interests are in religion and sex. I would like to be able to one day read Kant so I can finally be relieved of the need to find a philosophical justification for belief in God.

I also like Freud, Jung, Structuralism, Marx, continental philosophy, etc.

I wish English philosophy was deeper but then I wish continental philosophy was clearer.

Recently the religious implications of Quantum theory and synchrinicity theory of Jung have picqued my interest.

I think too much but I tried hardcore zen Buddhist meditation for a month in Plum Village with Thich Nhat Hanh and it did noohing for me.

Don't run away with the idea that there are any religious implications for QM, there are none. That sort of "philosophy" is for the coffee table and the Fortean magazine.
As far as I can tell the only justification for God in Kant is that he found it hard to conceive of a moral world in which there was no God. I feel that if he had known Darwin, Kant would have moved towards a Spinozan God or gone to atheism.

Bible Study Boy wrote:I am very religious and therefore philosiphical, if that is the word. I love reading and studying the bible. However, I am not like most Christians. I have what many call an extreme view on the bible. However, through my studies almost anyone can see that what I believe has a very valid basis. I also love to debate, especially when I am right. So hello everyone.