Physics and Infinity.
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:56 pm
Physics and Infinity.
==.
There is an opinion that science deals only with observable
universe. Then we have problem because modern physics
comes to situation when it meets unobservable world as
on the very small scales as on very big scales:
we cannot see quarks, virtual particles, gravitons
we cannot see dark energy- it is negative,
we cannot see dark mass- it neither emits nor reflects,
em waves- electron exist, but magneton- doesn’t: why?
Electron meets vacuum and we lost it- what is it destiny?
Some theories offer new spaces and particles which
no one can visualize.
Etc
It seems, to solve these problems we must understand the
unobservable world. In my opinion - the infinite world.
But, . . ‘ When you ask the theory questions, you have to be
very carful not to get infinite and inconsistent answer.’
/ ‘ The trouble with Physics’ page 55. Lee Smolin. /
Why?
Because there is a ‘scientific’ opinion- if the theory has
infinity it is wrong ( the scientist was mistaken).
It needs to escape from such solution ( using method
of renormalization ) and don’t think about it more.
Later, solving ‘infinity’ problem in such way we are
surprised that physics looks paradoxically.
#
Let us suppose that infinite world exists.
Then we can have materialistic (!) questions:
What are physical parameters of infinity?
How is possible to understand the infinity’s life?
How can we have concrete, finite, physical answers
from the infinity world?
What influence have infinite world on our Earth’s world?
P.S.
All answers must be received in the form of concrete
Physical laws and formulas!
Isn’t it a crazy project?
I think, Niels Bohr had waited for such project.
====.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==================..
==.
There is an opinion that science deals only with observable
universe. Then we have problem because modern physics
comes to situation when it meets unobservable world as
on the very small scales as on very big scales:
we cannot see quarks, virtual particles, gravitons
we cannot see dark energy- it is negative,
we cannot see dark mass- it neither emits nor reflects,
em waves- electron exist, but magneton- doesn’t: why?
Electron meets vacuum and we lost it- what is it destiny?
Some theories offer new spaces and particles which
no one can visualize.
Etc
It seems, to solve these problems we must understand the
unobservable world. In my opinion - the infinite world.
But, . . ‘ When you ask the theory questions, you have to be
very carful not to get infinite and inconsistent answer.’
/ ‘ The trouble with Physics’ page 55. Lee Smolin. /
Why?
Because there is a ‘scientific’ opinion- if the theory has
infinity it is wrong ( the scientist was mistaken).
It needs to escape from such solution ( using method
of renormalization ) and don’t think about it more.
Later, solving ‘infinity’ problem in such way we are
surprised that physics looks paradoxically.
#
Let us suppose that infinite world exists.
Then we can have materialistic (!) questions:
What are physical parameters of infinity?
How is possible to understand the infinity’s life?
How can we have concrete, finite, physical answers
from the infinity world?
What influence have infinite world on our Earth’s world?
P.S.
All answers must be received in the form of concrete
Physical laws and formulas!
Isn’t it a crazy project?
I think, Niels Bohr had waited for such project.
====.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
==================..