Why the Speed of Light Is Not Constant Via Mereoology; The Limits of Scientific Theory and Axioms
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2026 6:01 pm
Why the Speed of Light Is Not Constant
Via Mereoology; The Limits of Scientific Theory and Axioms
1. Light, L, moves from Point A to Point B as context C. L: C(A-> B)
This is line segment C.
2. The observation of Light is in the of another set of points, X and Y as context Z. Z(X -> Y)
This is line segment Z
3. Context Z is also the speed of light, as it is derived from light.
4. Z contains X: Z(X), where Z and X are fractals of eachother thus but degree of fractals one speed of light occurs quicker relative to another as the space is a fraction of the other.
Line segment Z contains line segment X
5. Inversely Z is contained by Y, Y(Z).
Line segment Z is contained by line segment Y.
6. Where the differences in space imply the said differences not changing the actual speed of change, as a shorter distance is traversed quicker than another, the fixed point of the speed of light is distance traversed.
7. While distance 1, A, may contain 2×1/2, B and C, as a change in scale, the speed remains the same as rate 1 is the same as rate 2×1/2.
Line segment A contains line segments B and C.
8. However 2×1/2 reveals 1/2 thus there are an inverse 2 units thus effectively are each one and these relative 1's, reveal a more compressed speed than the original A via B and C.
Line segment A is a relative fixed 1.
Line segments B and C are a relative fixed 1.
9. Light self scales and the speed of it is relative to its relative self-scaling. Each relative fixed one, A or (B, C).
If light is constant across X, but X both contains and is contained by further X's than what remains of the speed of light is a fixed scale amidst many.
10. The speed of light is an expression of a fixed scale, one of potentially infinite, thus effectively is a context used to measure other contexts. Visually this can be expressed as a line segment being both a context of and context for further line segments.
11. Empirically, the testing of the speed of light, in a vacuum, requires the testing apparatus that contains the vaccuum as subject to the speed of light outside the vacuum as the testing apparatus, which contains light, is also apart of the scale of light outside of it.
12. Given the speed of light is context dependent, via the apparatus, what remains of the speed of light is the fixed point of apparatus thus relegating the speed of light as effectively the construction of the vary same materials requiring it thus by default the question of speed is a question of geometric construction, via the limits of the apparatus.
13. Given the speed requires geometric line segments as the expression, and the relation of one line segment to another as the scale of change, this layer of geometry relates to to the geometric structure of both the appartus and the particles determining the apparatus as pivotal.
14. Speed effectively is reduced to context, via mereological limits, and what remains as fixed is the mereology rather than speed itself. In these respects speed is relative, absolute in context but illusory under change in context, and what remains as fixed is purely the distinction of limits within the distinction of limits.
15. Any expression of physics, via mathematics, becomes subsidiary to the event of distinction, via limits, as both abstract numbers and empirical substance are reduced to distinctions in themselves, by degree of there emergent limits as number and matter, and as such a pre-mathematical approach is necessary.
16. Physics is fundamentally an expression of distinctions, scientific testing is an expression of the observer effect by degree of the test and the testing apparatus.
17. Consider two paths of light. Linear A to B as unit distance 1C, and curved X to Y as unit distance 1C but unit distance 1/2X relative to linear A to B.
The distance traveled for both is 1 C. The linear path and the curved path result in the same time and distance traversed in one context. However the distinct distance between X and Y, from a linear direction, takes longer than A and B and a linear X and Y is shorter than a linear A and B, although both A,B and X,Y are the same distance from another context.
As the curve increases in X and Y, unto a deeper curve or complete angle, the distince as a whole remains the same and yet the linear distance contracts thus relegating two different speeds of light, the curve/angle and the linear distance.
A complete contraction of the angle results in instantaneous traversal of light while a relative same light speed from the total distance.
A complete contraction of the curve unto a circle results in the same result.
18. Thus within any relative short distance of light and longer distance can be travailed simultaneously thus resulting in multiple different and yet simultaneous speeds; speed thus effectively is a mereological event deterimed by the application of distinctions and as such is absolute in context and yet relative via the observer effect thus necessitating at higher dimensions of meretopological multiple consistent speeds relative to the same primitive event of distinction via boundary/limit assertions.
19. The nature of time, fundamentally, is a geometric event as it is the rate of repetition, of a given thing, within a length of space, thus effectively resulting in a ratio of spaces within spaces.
An example would be X number of line segments, within a given line segment, corresponding to the number of revolutions within a set of revolutions of any given distinction, be it particle or celestial, thus relegating time to be fractal spaces.
20. This fractal nature of time further corresponds to the fractal nature of transversable speed, via expansion and contraction of distance, thus relegating time being grounded in mereology rather than a spatial event, or from a purely spatial event it is revealed as recursive spatial limits.
21. In these contexts space/time and speed/distance are expressions of the event of distinction and as such are not fundamental properties outside of a specific context or contexts of observation.
22. As distinctions what remains is self-embedding limits, time as recursive space reveals:
X line segments within line segment Y
Each relative line segment containing others.
Line segment Y composing a further line segments.
23. The line segment remains constant, but the ratios within and of change by degree of the application of ratios of line segments, thus time is revealed as an applied boundary, not fixed outside of its own context.
24. Lightspeed is an expression of context via distinctions, thus a pre/trans physical event reveals lightspeed as an expression of distinction thus relegating empirical and abstract dichtomies as only reference points of observation rather than fixed degrees of interpretation outside of the applied measurements.
What remains at the pre-physical level is distinction.
25. Under the distinction of a vaccuum a contradiction occurs:
26. In a pure vaccuum lightspeed is measured against itself thus effectively the speed is a fractal. If this is the case then the speed of light is self-referential recursion. In this respect a pure vacuum would reveal light as instantaneous as it is its own reference point.
27. A pure vacuum state would reveal light as non-linear and the speed of light expanding would effectively reveal not only the linear AB and XY expansion but the simultaneous speed between AX and BY thus multiple non-linear fields of light are present and as non-linear the speed becomes a relative expression of its curvature.
28. In a constructed vaccuum light speed is measured relative to what is contained by the vacuum, the limits of the vacuum, thus lightspeed is not measured by a pure vacuum but rather the limits of the vaccuum itself via the apparatus and what is measured is not a vacuum state but the limits of the vaccuum.
29. Measured within a contain vacuum the speed is measured from a focal point outside the vacuum thus what remains is light measured from outside the vacuum, thus by degree of the testing apparatus light is not measured within a pure vacuum due to the reference point outside the vacuum.
30. Speed is a purely mereotopological context via the pre/trans physical event of distinction and this event of distinction reveals the fundamental axioms of science as relative assumptions that upon self-reference are but emergent points of how attention is directed and organized rather than fixed objective realities.
Via Mereoology; The Limits of Scientific Theory and Axioms
1. Light, L, moves from Point A to Point B as context C. L: C(A-> B)
This is line segment C.
2. The observation of Light is in the of another set of points, X and Y as context Z. Z(X -> Y)
This is line segment Z
3. Context Z is also the speed of light, as it is derived from light.
4. Z contains X: Z(X), where Z and X are fractals of eachother thus but degree of fractals one speed of light occurs quicker relative to another as the space is a fraction of the other.
Line segment Z contains line segment X
5. Inversely Z is contained by Y, Y(Z).
Line segment Z is contained by line segment Y.
6. Where the differences in space imply the said differences not changing the actual speed of change, as a shorter distance is traversed quicker than another, the fixed point of the speed of light is distance traversed.
7. While distance 1, A, may contain 2×1/2, B and C, as a change in scale, the speed remains the same as rate 1 is the same as rate 2×1/2.
Line segment A contains line segments B and C.
8. However 2×1/2 reveals 1/2 thus there are an inverse 2 units thus effectively are each one and these relative 1's, reveal a more compressed speed than the original A via B and C.
Line segment A is a relative fixed 1.
Line segments B and C are a relative fixed 1.
9. Light self scales and the speed of it is relative to its relative self-scaling. Each relative fixed one, A or (B, C).
If light is constant across X, but X both contains and is contained by further X's than what remains of the speed of light is a fixed scale amidst many.
10. The speed of light is an expression of a fixed scale, one of potentially infinite, thus effectively is a context used to measure other contexts. Visually this can be expressed as a line segment being both a context of and context for further line segments.
11. Empirically, the testing of the speed of light, in a vacuum, requires the testing apparatus that contains the vaccuum as subject to the speed of light outside the vacuum as the testing apparatus, which contains light, is also apart of the scale of light outside of it.
12. Given the speed of light is context dependent, via the apparatus, what remains of the speed of light is the fixed point of apparatus thus relegating the speed of light as effectively the construction of the vary same materials requiring it thus by default the question of speed is a question of geometric construction, via the limits of the apparatus.
13. Given the speed requires geometric line segments as the expression, and the relation of one line segment to another as the scale of change, this layer of geometry relates to to the geometric structure of both the appartus and the particles determining the apparatus as pivotal.
14. Speed effectively is reduced to context, via mereological limits, and what remains as fixed is the mereology rather than speed itself. In these respects speed is relative, absolute in context but illusory under change in context, and what remains as fixed is purely the distinction of limits within the distinction of limits.
15. Any expression of physics, via mathematics, becomes subsidiary to the event of distinction, via limits, as both abstract numbers and empirical substance are reduced to distinctions in themselves, by degree of there emergent limits as number and matter, and as such a pre-mathematical approach is necessary.
16. Physics is fundamentally an expression of distinctions, scientific testing is an expression of the observer effect by degree of the test and the testing apparatus.
17. Consider two paths of light. Linear A to B as unit distance 1C, and curved X to Y as unit distance 1C but unit distance 1/2X relative to linear A to B.
The distance traveled for both is 1 C. The linear path and the curved path result in the same time and distance traversed in one context. However the distinct distance between X and Y, from a linear direction, takes longer than A and B and a linear X and Y is shorter than a linear A and B, although both A,B and X,Y are the same distance from another context.
As the curve increases in X and Y, unto a deeper curve or complete angle, the distince as a whole remains the same and yet the linear distance contracts thus relegating two different speeds of light, the curve/angle and the linear distance.
A complete contraction of the angle results in instantaneous traversal of light while a relative same light speed from the total distance.
A complete contraction of the curve unto a circle results in the same result.
18. Thus within any relative short distance of light and longer distance can be travailed simultaneously thus resulting in multiple different and yet simultaneous speeds; speed thus effectively is a mereological event deterimed by the application of distinctions and as such is absolute in context and yet relative via the observer effect thus necessitating at higher dimensions of meretopological multiple consistent speeds relative to the same primitive event of distinction via boundary/limit assertions.
19. The nature of time, fundamentally, is a geometric event as it is the rate of repetition, of a given thing, within a length of space, thus effectively resulting in a ratio of spaces within spaces.
An example would be X number of line segments, within a given line segment, corresponding to the number of revolutions within a set of revolutions of any given distinction, be it particle or celestial, thus relegating time to be fractal spaces.
20. This fractal nature of time further corresponds to the fractal nature of transversable speed, via expansion and contraction of distance, thus relegating time being grounded in mereology rather than a spatial event, or from a purely spatial event it is revealed as recursive spatial limits.
21. In these contexts space/time and speed/distance are expressions of the event of distinction and as such are not fundamental properties outside of a specific context or contexts of observation.
22. As distinctions what remains is self-embedding limits, time as recursive space reveals:
X line segments within line segment Y
Each relative line segment containing others.
Line segment Y composing a further line segments.
23. The line segment remains constant, but the ratios within and of change by degree of the application of ratios of line segments, thus time is revealed as an applied boundary, not fixed outside of its own context.
24. Lightspeed is an expression of context via distinctions, thus a pre/trans physical event reveals lightspeed as an expression of distinction thus relegating empirical and abstract dichtomies as only reference points of observation rather than fixed degrees of interpretation outside of the applied measurements.
What remains at the pre-physical level is distinction.
25. Under the distinction of a vaccuum a contradiction occurs:
26. In a pure vaccuum lightspeed is measured against itself thus effectively the speed is a fractal. If this is the case then the speed of light is self-referential recursion. In this respect a pure vacuum would reveal light as instantaneous as it is its own reference point.
27. A pure vacuum state would reveal light as non-linear and the speed of light expanding would effectively reveal not only the linear AB and XY expansion but the simultaneous speed between AX and BY thus multiple non-linear fields of light are present and as non-linear the speed becomes a relative expression of its curvature.
28. In a constructed vaccuum light speed is measured relative to what is contained by the vacuum, the limits of the vacuum, thus lightspeed is not measured by a pure vacuum but rather the limits of the vaccuum itself via the apparatus and what is measured is not a vacuum state but the limits of the vaccuum.
29. Measured within a contain vacuum the speed is measured from a focal point outside the vacuum thus what remains is light measured from outside the vacuum, thus by degree of the testing apparatus light is not measured within a pure vacuum due to the reference point outside the vacuum.
30. Speed is a purely mereotopological context via the pre/trans physical event of distinction and this event of distinction reveals the fundamental axioms of science as relative assumptions that upon self-reference are but emergent points of how attention is directed and organized rather than fixed objective realities.