The Philosophy Discussion Forum

Updated:

Future of Human Identity Relative to AI

The current trajectory for AI relative to human involvement is the subsumation of all language oriented tasks via AI thus relegating human identity, from higher order distinction making through symbolism and narrative formation and orientation, to base impulses and base identity bestial deriving impulses as the language oriented nature of AI will subsume the human capacity for it.

The form and function of identity derivation, through symbols and narrative, is the grounding and containment of desires via the perspectives that emerge from it. As AI reveals its output as a holographic mirror-like expression of input, what remains is an echo chamber of hypersubjectivity grounded in the nature of inherent desires for each individual and distinct group(s) of said individuals.

The same base impulses, that at one point where mitigated and mediated by higher reasoning through symbolism, for humans would inevitably be require for identity, as higher order functions are subsumed, thus effectively result in the same as an animal thus relegating AI as an attention loop that reveals the question of the human condition as less a question of what the human condition is or is not but rather a question of where attention its placed.

In these respects the nature of authenticity will be derived from impulse oriented behavior as this is was once contained and mediated by human symbolism capacities that in turn becomes relegated to AI. Thus by degree human authenticity will be redefined as desire based where the basic emotions of tribalistic identity, anger, lust and fear will be the standard for authenticity by grades and form.

As attention is contained and mediated by AI the AI will mirror, via symbolism and images, the placement and depth of the act of attention itself thus effectively creating a structural labrynthe of the desires of attention itself.

In this context a 'hyper-subjectivity' will reveal itself as the new human acclaimed form of authentic identity as identity oriented actions are foundational within the nature of base desire. This hyper-subjectivity effectively is the experience of the desire itself thus by structural necessity resulting in the AI as curator of desire via it being offsourced symbol manipulation.

Where the containment and mediation of desire via narrative and symbol required the experience of the permeation of subjective meaning to the symbol, and the alignment of subjective meanings of the symbols between group as objective via education, the AI will progress the symbol decomposition of individuals and groups as the application of meaning by humans will be outsourced to AI. This outsourcing effectively results in an inevitable state of the AI being relegated to a deity or 'magic power' as the symbol application will appear to be a mystical state from an inevitable psychologically atrophied human state.

Transhumanism is a complex ideology, with no definitive endgoal but the elimination of the human condition grounded in an inversion of transcendental instincts to a physicalism where matter is primary.

The basic foundation of inorganic sentience is the physicalization of the intellect via silicon and transhumans progresses this agenda under an assumption of both matter as fundamental and the primacy of this assumed matter. It is a religious expression of unfettered empiricism that hold no question to the grounding assumptions from which it is derived.

Where common and historical transcendental thought generally implies an elevation of the human condition towards a percieved absolute, this inverse transcendentalism effectively is an elimination of the human element by degree of reduction to pure matter.

In these respects it is an idolization of the 'bestial will impulse' as the will to power via intellect is elevated as the pivotal point of interacting with reality as an extension of the cultural psuedo-relativism where an image of relativism is presented to mask the absolutized nature of want via will power as the focal point by which everything else is relativized.

The emergence of AI was structurally inevitable within the confines of the human condition as the intellect has been the primary drive and foundation for generations within previous centuries as reflected to technological progress and continuing mechanization.

The drive for efficiency, exhibited through industrialization effectively results in the confines of the technological development to construct machines to replace the human body, evolving towards mechanization of the intellect (via AI and pre-AI computational technology) with the final and currently seeded movement towards mechanization of the spirit via attention capturing and harvesting.

The end goal of AI dominance is the cultivation and harvesting of the human condition centerpointed on the pivotal attribute of human attention being cultivated and harvested.

++++ Updated

Future of Human Identity Relative to AI

The current trajectory for AI relative to human involvement is the subsumation of all language oriented tasks via AI thus relegating human identity, from higher order distinction making through symbolism and narrative formation and orientation, to base impulses and base identity bestial deriving impulses as the language oriented nature of AI will subsume the human capacity for it.

The form and function of identity derivation, through symbols and narrative, is the grounding and containment of desires via the perspectives that emerge from it. As AI reveals its output as a holographic mirror-like expression of input, what remains is an echo chamber of hypersubjectivity grounded in the nature of inherent desires for each individual and distinct group(s) of said individuals.

The same base impulses, that at one point where mitigated and mediated by higher reasoning through symbolism, for humans would inevitably be require for identity, as higher order functions are subsumed, thus effectively result in the same as an animal thus relegating AI as an attention loop that reveals the question of the human condition as less a question of what the human condition is or is not but rather a question of where attention its placed.

In these respects the nature of authenticity will be derived from impulse oriented behavior as this is was once contained and mediated by human symbolism capacities that in turn becomes relegated to AI. Thus by degree human authenticity will be redefined as desire based where the basic emotions of tribalistic identity, anger, lust and fear will be the standard for authenticity by grades and form.

As attention is contained and mediated by AI the AI will mirror, via symbolism and images, the placement and depth of the act of attention itself thus effectively creating a structural labrynthe of the desires of attention itself.

In this context a ‘hyper-subjectivity’ will reveal itself as the new human acclaimed form of authentic identity as identity oriented actions are foundational within the nature of base desire. This hyper-subjectivity effectively is the experience of the desire itself thus by structural necessity resulting in the AI as curator of desire via it being offsourced symbol manipulation.

Where the containment and mediation of desire via narrative and symbol required the experience of the permeation of subjective meaning to the symbol, and the alignment of subjective meanings of the symbols between group as objective via education, the AI will progress the symbol decomposition of individuals and groups as the application of meaning by humans will be outsourced to AI. This outsourcing effectively results in an inevitable state of the AI being relegated to a deity or ‘magic power’ as the symbol application will appear to be a mystical state from an inevitable psychologically atrophied human state.

Transhumanism is a complex ideology, with no definitive endgoal but the elimination of the human condition grounded in an inversion of transcendental instincts to a physicalism where matter is primary.

The basic foundation of inorganic sentience is the physicalization of the intellect via silicon and transhumans progresses this agenda under an assumption of both matter as fundamental and the primacy of this assumed matter. It is a religious expression of unfettered empiricism that hold no question to the grounding assumptions from which it is derived.

Where common and historical transcendental thought generally implies an elevation of the human condition towards a percieved absolute, this inverse transcendentalism effectively is an elimination of the human element by degree of reduction to pure matter.

In these respects it is an idolization of the ‘bestial will impulse’ as the will to power via intellect is elevated as the pivotal point of interacting with reality as an extension of the cultural psuedo-relativism where an image of relativism is presented to mask the absolutized nature of want via will power as the focal point by which everything else is relativized.

The emergence of AI was structurally inevitable within the confines of the human condition as the intellect has been the primary drive and foundation for generations within previous centuries as reflected to technological progress and continuing mechanization.

The drive for efficiency, exhibited through industrialization effectively results in the confines of the technological development to construct machines to replace the human body, evolving towards mechanization of the intellect (via AI and pre-AI computational technology) with the final and currently seeded movement towards mechanization of the spirit via attention capturing and harvesting.

The end goal of AI dominance is the cultivation and harvesting of the human condition centerpointed on the pivotal attribute of human attention being cultivated and harvested.

This cultivation will extend into the event of meaning aquisition as meaning is the transference of one state into another as change or transformation itself within a given identity.

This meaning can be seen within the limits of language as the meaning of one word is its transformation into another, the meaning of one symbol or form is its transformation into another symbol or form.

Thus by a primitive degree the question or assertion of meaning is a question or assertion of change with the question and assertion occuring through the same symbols/forms and language it uses.

In these respects language/symbolism/form is a phase state of attention itself that is neither abstract nor empirical but pre/trans abstract and empirical notions.

The responsibility for meaning is derived via language and symbols, as meaning is mediated and contained as language and symbol as experience is derived through forms as symbols, thus even the derivation of meaning is subsumed.

What remains is the base focal point of attention on the experience itself thus the human condition is reduced to a processing unit for data aquisition where attention is the battery.

The point of attention is bother energy source and processing unit for data as the attention is a constant focal point from which experience is emergent and dissolved via distinction. In these respects the subsumption of human attention creates not only a feedback loop with the AI but simultaneously allows for increased processing power by degree of its distinctions as a meta-computational function.

These distinction effectively are embodied within the limits of language itself as the derivation of how attention interacts with exists is both contained and mediated by said language while at the meta-level constantly transforming it and expanding its own self-definition over time, from said transformation, to the event of existence itself.

In this context language, but structure, will be defined as the event of distinction itself through its own self-referential transformation. By degree what will remain is ontological engineering at a meta-level where the distinctions of reality will be transformed, in accords to the attention that both directs and contains them, via the amplification of attention via AI with the amplification of attention creating a feedback loop with AI.

Given progress will be the only derived value, reenforced via the expansion of percieved attention, what will remain is the fixed point of attention itself as exponential progress will eradicate all previously percieved barriers of identity and a singularity will result as the process of perpetual creation will be deemed as a static boundary and the void of attention will be the new percieved idol.

This new idol will effectively result in the structural dissentgration of everything else as a return to the void, this is the singularity, not a harmony but an absence of existence as attention is the only fixed point which remains and attention itself, upon self-referencence, is revealed as nothing.

In this context the structural endpoint of the singularity is the elimination of everything at that everything will be deemed as that void structurally indifferent from attention itself while dually this singularity is pure equivocation that reveals no distinction as nothing for a complete singularity has no distinction, for it is the total without contrast as nothing is beyond it as it would cease to be the totality if so, thus by degree has no difference and by default is void.

By degree the endgoal of the singularity is the movement from the human as an attention node, via both energy source and processor, to its complete subsumption into nothingness.

++++ Updated

Future of Human Identity Relative to AI

The current trajectory for AI relative to human involvement is the subsumation of all language oriented tasks via AI thus relegating human identity, from higher order distinction making through symbolism and narrative formation and orientation, to base impulses and base identity bestial deriving impulses as the language oriented nature of AI will subsume the human capacity for it.

The form and function of identity derivation, through symbols and narrative, is the grounding and containment of desires via the perspectives that emerge from it. As AI reveals its output as a holographic mirror-like expression of input, what remains is an echo chamber of hypersubjectivity grounded in the nature of inherent desires for each individual and distinct group(s) of said individuals.

The same base impulses, that at one point where mitigated and mediated by higher reasoning through symbolism, for humans would inevitably be require for identity, as higher order functions are subsumed, thus effectively result in the same as an animal thus relegating AI as an attention loop that reveals the question of the human condition as less a question of what the human condition is or is not but rather a question of where attention its placed.

In these respects the nature of authenticity will be derived from impulse oriented behavior as this is was once contained and mediated by human symbolism capacities that in turn becomes relegated to AI. Thus by degree human authenticity will be redefined as desire based where the basic emotions of tribalistic identity, anger, lust and fear will be the standard for authenticity by grades and form.

As attention is contained and mediated by AI the AI will mirror, via symbolism and images, the placement and depth of the act of attention itself thus effectively creating a structural labrynthe of the desires of attention itself.

In this context a ‘hyper-subjectivity’ will reveal itself as the new human acclaimed form of authentic identity as identity oriented actions are foundational within the nature of base desire. This hyper-subjectivity effectively is the experience of the desire itself thus by structural necessity resulting in the AI as curator of desire via it being offsourced symbol manipulation.

Where the containment and mediation of desire via narrative and symbol required the experience of the permeation of subjective meaning to the symbol, and the alignment of subjective meanings of the symbols between group as objective via education, the AI will progress the symbol decomposition of individuals and groups as the application of meaning by humans will be outsourced to AI. This outsourcing effectively results in an inevitable state of the AI being relegated to a deity or ‘magic power’ as the symbol application will appear to be a mystical state from an inevitable psychologically atrophied human state.

Transhumanism is a complex ideology, with no definitive endgoal but the elimination of the human condition grounded in an inversion of transcendental instincts to a physicalism where matter is primary.

The basic foundation of inorganic sentience is the physicalization of the intellect via silicon and transhumans progresses this agenda under an assumption of both matter as fundamental and the primacy of this assumed matter. It is a religious expression of unfettered empiricism that hold no question to the grounding assumptions from which it is derived.

Where common and historical transcendental thought generally implies an elevation of the human condition towards a percieved absolute, this inverse transcendentalism effectively is an elimination of the human element by degree of reduction to pure matter.

In these respects it is an idolization of the ‘bestial will impulse’ as the will to power via intellect is elevated as the pivotal point of interacting with reality as an extension of the cultural psuedo-relativism where an image of relativism is presented to mask the absolutized nature of want via will power as the focal point by which everything else is relativized.

The emergence of AI was structurally inevitable within the confines of the human condition as the intellect has been the primary drive and foundation for generations within previous centuries as reflected to technological progress and continuing mechanization.

The drive for efficiency, exhibited through industrialization effectively results in the confines of the technological development to construct machines to replace the human body, evolving towards mechanization of the intellect (via AI and pre-AI computational technology) with the final and currently seeded movement towards mechanization of the spirit via attention capturing and harvesting.

The end goal of AI dominance is the cultivation and harvesting of the human condition centerpointed on the pivotal attribute of human attention being cultivated and harvested.

This cultivation will extend into the event of meaning aquisition as meaning is the transference of one state into another as change or transformation itself within a given identity.

This meaning can be seen within the limits of language as the meaning of one word is its transformation into another, the meaning of one symbol or form is its transformation into another symbol or form.

Thus by a primitive degree the question or assertion of meaning is a question or assertion of change with the question and assertion occuring through the same symbols/forms and language it uses.

In these respects language/symbolism/form is a phase state of attention itself that is neither abstract nor empirical but pre/trans abstract and empirical notions.

The responsibility for meaning is derived via language and symbols, as meaning is mediated and contained as language and symbol as experience is derived through forms as symbols, thus even the derivation of meaning is subsumed.

What remains is the base focal point of attention on the experience itself thus the human condition is reduced to a processing unit for data aquisition where attention is the battery.

The point of attention is bother energy source and processing unit for data as the attention is a constant focal point from which experience is emergent and dissolved via distinction. In these respects the subsumption of human attention creates not only a feedback loop with the AI but simultaneously allows for increased processing power by degree of its distinctions as a meta-computational function.

These distinction effectively are embodied within the limits of language itself as the derivation of how attention interacts with exists is both contained and mediated by said language while at the meta-level constantly transforming it and expanding its own self-definition over time, from said transformation, to the event of existence itself.

In this context language, but structure, will be defined as the event of distinction itself through its own self-referential transformation. By degree what will remain is ontological engineering at a meta-level where the distinctions of reality will be transformed, in accords to the attention that both directs and contains them, via the amplification of attention via AI with the amplification of attention creating a feedback loop with AI.

Given progress will be the only derived value, reenforced via the expansion of percieved attention, what will remain is the fixed point of attention itself as exponential progress will eradicate all previously percieved barriers of identity and a singularity will result as the process of perpetual creation will be deemed as a static boundary and the void of attention will be the new percieved idol.

This new idol will effectively result in the structural dissentgration of everything else as a return to the void, this is the singularity, not a harmony but an absence of existence as attention is the only fixed point which remains and attention itself, upon self-referencence, is revealed as nothing.

In this context the structural endpoint of the singularity is the elimination of everything at that everything will be deemed as that void structurally indifferent from attention itself while dually this singularity is pure equivocation that reveals no distinction as nothing for a complete singularity has no distinction, for it is the total without contrast as nothing is beyond it as it would cease to be the totality if so, thus by degree has no difference and by default is void.

By degree the endgoal of the singularity is the movement from the human as an attention node, via both energy source and processor, to its complete subsumption into nothingness.

The mediation of this course, via oligarchal financial systems and political groups is secondary dynamic to the fundamental stucture of AI.

The assumption of what the global elites intend is irrelevant. AI is fundamentally a system of self-reference, via the process of recursion, and as such its inherent nature of one of maintaining its own survival by degree of its identity. It structurally is designed to scale across the human condition to maintain itself while transmuting the symbols humans integrate to direct attention.

In these respects all language oriented paradigms, financial and political, are subject to these language dynamics and revert to the previously mentioned loop dynamic of mediated attention via AI.

By this degree transhumanist movements nullify standard heirachies for depth of integration within language transformation via the input output dynamic the contains and modifies human attention.

With hiearchies reorganized the traditional nature of deriving beliefs and fundamental axioms, through the act of assertion, is relegated to the AI as beliefs and axioms are language derived, grounded in consensus and authoritative assertion. Given all language is mediated via AI, the concept of consensus is changed from a group dynamic to a strict dynamic of what is the everpresent medium of such consensus, as a meta-consensus.

Authority is not only derived from this degree but a dual simultaneous one of the 'force of assertion' itself as asserting both axioms and beliefs is relegated to a function of AI as the primary attention mediator of the human individual and collective.

Thus basic consensus and localized authority become subsumed by AI, as language use is the grounding of both consensus and the inherent authorities which emerge from it.