Why cyber security is impossible
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 5:28 am
Although it is possible to make security improbable to breach, due to complexity, it is, by first principles of information, impossible to make anything secure using grammar.
Why is that? Let me lay it out for you, and see if you can see the conclusion.
There are two, and only two types of identity, as there are two and only two parts of speech.
As Plato observed, a long time ago, the perceptible can never be the intelligible, nor can the intelligible ever be the perceptible. In one expression, the point is that which has no part, in another, the map is not the territory, and again, a noun is not a verb.
Information processing is grammar. Grammar can never be ungrammatical, that is grammar can never be different from itself. And as all information is simply binary processing, binary recursion can only produce a binary result.
Grammar is the preservation and utilization of memory. The memory of a thing is not the thing of which it is the memory of.
Thus, the common claim that one can make identity from grammar is a fallacy.
As there are two types of equality, there are two types of identity. The perceptible identity can never be the intelligible identity and the intelligible identity can never be the perceptible identity.
So, the simple minded will always believe that grammar can be secured from itself; that is a self referential fallacy.
The claim that corporations make that your information can be made secure solely using grammar, passwords, digital mapping, etc., is actually a lie. So when corporations like Microsoft do everything in their power to make air gapping your system impossible, it is because they know the truth, and that is why they tell you that they are securing your information, when that is not possible, they are deliberately lying to you knowing that the common individual is too stupid to figure out that there is no grammar system which can produce a perceptible absolute. Microsoft is preaching Harry Potter Security solutions.
Why is that? Let me lay it out for you, and see if you can see the conclusion.
There are two, and only two types of identity, as there are two and only two parts of speech.
As Plato observed, a long time ago, the perceptible can never be the intelligible, nor can the intelligible ever be the perceptible. In one expression, the point is that which has no part, in another, the map is not the territory, and again, a noun is not a verb.
Information processing is grammar. Grammar can never be ungrammatical, that is grammar can never be different from itself. And as all information is simply binary processing, binary recursion can only produce a binary result.
Grammar is the preservation and utilization of memory. The memory of a thing is not the thing of which it is the memory of.
Thus, the common claim that one can make identity from grammar is a fallacy.
As there are two types of equality, there are two types of identity. The perceptible identity can never be the intelligible identity and the intelligible identity can never be the perceptible identity.
So, the simple minded will always believe that grammar can be secured from itself; that is a self referential fallacy.
The claim that corporations make that your information can be made secure solely using grammar, passwords, digital mapping, etc., is actually a lie. So when corporations like Microsoft do everything in their power to make air gapping your system impossible, it is because they know the truth, and that is why they tell you that they are securing your information, when that is not possible, they are deliberately lying to you knowing that the common individual is too stupid to figure out that there is no grammar system which can produce a perceptible absolute. Microsoft is preaching Harry Potter Security solutions.