Words From Synapse to Imagery
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2026 6:43 am
WORDS - CODE TO UNDERSTANDING OTHERS
All of the imagery we have observed in life, including imagery formed in imagination and dreams, is stored in the brain as electronic data. Not pictures or forms, but encoded information. Over time humans, developed sounds and words to operates as an interface interpreting what occurs between the brain’s electronic processes and our need for shared understanding. That interface is symbolic language. Letters form words, words form sentences, sentences form concepts, and concepts appear to us as imagery. In this symbolic state, imagery contains sufficient instruction to be reproduced. Once imparted to another, either as a conscious thought presented to the mind, or reproduced in the form of a material reconstruction carried out using matter.
At the initial energizing of a synapse, the brain begins a search across its distributed data stores, drawing from what has been seen, heard, tasted, and from all other sensory impressions. As each facet of experience is queried for relevance, the accumulating data begins to shape a facsimile of the original event. When the process is complete, the brain presents a recurrence accurate enough to evoke a vicarious re-experiencing: remembrance. What appears to us as imagery is the result of this collation, not the data itself.
The brain, however, has no means to express imagery beyond itself. Imagery can be experienced only by the individual mind in which it appears. To share it with the external world required something the brain alone could not provide. Since we cannot access, understand, or control synapses directly, we require a different code to unlock the ‘markings’ it represents. A code capable of converting internal imagery into data that can exist outside the brain. While only the brain can form imagery from synapses, it is not the brain’s role to externalize their meaning. Its work ends with sensory recall and presentation to the mind.
The task of externalization is an intellectual development, consciously created to facilitate man’s need to understand one another. Since we cannot write code in synapse, we developed a method of converting our mental imagery into symbols [letters and words], that could be reconstructed into imagery to be seen in another mind. It does this without needing further participation of the original neural event. The original brains synapses are converted into code that operates between humans, not brains.
Mankind’s language code, draws its symbolism from experiences outside the brain, using words to represent external reality, in part or in whole. Each word expresses its part of nuance derived from commonly shared experience. This enables language to express not only objects and actions, but the subtleties of perception and intent.
From this, I conclude that the period of experience we call life, provided the means to create a language that does not require flesh to function. This language, once formed, exists independently of the brain that generated it. As such, it presents a mode of communication that is not bound to a fleshly body, but capable of persisting beyond it.
All of the imagery we have observed in life, including imagery formed in imagination and dreams, is stored in the brain as electronic data. Not pictures or forms, but encoded information. Over time humans, developed sounds and words to operates as an interface interpreting what occurs between the brain’s electronic processes and our need for shared understanding. That interface is symbolic language. Letters form words, words form sentences, sentences form concepts, and concepts appear to us as imagery. In this symbolic state, imagery contains sufficient instruction to be reproduced. Once imparted to another, either as a conscious thought presented to the mind, or reproduced in the form of a material reconstruction carried out using matter.
At the initial energizing of a synapse, the brain begins a search across its distributed data stores, drawing from what has been seen, heard, tasted, and from all other sensory impressions. As each facet of experience is queried for relevance, the accumulating data begins to shape a facsimile of the original event. When the process is complete, the brain presents a recurrence accurate enough to evoke a vicarious re-experiencing: remembrance. What appears to us as imagery is the result of this collation, not the data itself.
The brain, however, has no means to express imagery beyond itself. Imagery can be experienced only by the individual mind in which it appears. To share it with the external world required something the brain alone could not provide. Since we cannot access, understand, or control synapses directly, we require a different code to unlock the ‘markings’ it represents. A code capable of converting internal imagery into data that can exist outside the brain. While only the brain can form imagery from synapses, it is not the brain’s role to externalize their meaning. Its work ends with sensory recall and presentation to the mind.
The task of externalization is an intellectual development, consciously created to facilitate man’s need to understand one another. Since we cannot write code in synapse, we developed a method of converting our mental imagery into symbols [letters and words], that could be reconstructed into imagery to be seen in another mind. It does this without needing further participation of the original neural event. The original brains synapses are converted into code that operates between humans, not brains.
Mankind’s language code, draws its symbolism from experiences outside the brain, using words to represent external reality, in part or in whole. Each word expresses its part of nuance derived from commonly shared experience. This enables language to express not only objects and actions, but the subtleties of perception and intent.
From this, I conclude that the period of experience we call life, provided the means to create a language that does not require flesh to function. This language, once formed, exists independently of the brain that generated it. As such, it presents a mode of communication that is not bound to a fleshly body, but capable of persisting beyond it.