What to do with your relatives.
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2026 6:22 pm
I am just practicing while my machine is recording the Sophist again.
Now, some people, when they read the topic, perhaps think of parents, sibling's, or someone in the genealogy tree.
However, relatives are a given, any difference whatsoever.
And, all of behavior is learning how to parse relatives in order to make things. Things which amuse us, things to aid us in survival.
But however you look at it, we have just these two parts called the two parts of speech, even cause and effect, agent and patient, or even agent and passion.
All of reasoning, to all of arts, science and craft, is about applying our behavior in parsing these givens.
Now, something like that is how one should view any topic, what we do, voluntarily, or involuntarily, to any given relative.
Independent of these two parts of speech, are what is called judgment, what we can do, logically, mathematically, or capricely.
The intelligible operations do not tell you how to effect any perceptible operation, that is up to science and technology.
The intelligible is what our intelligence is based on, or standards of intelligible information parsing.
My machine is running on the project I call, The Apollo dialogs of Socrates. Something it seems goes unnoticed in the dialogs.
There are seven dialogs of Plato that start on the day after the first day of Apollo's Festival.
Theaetetus, Euthyphro, Apology, Sophist, Statesman, Crito and Phaedo.
So, I might be the first to make available those 7, in order, not only in videobook, but also ebook form.
Now, I mentioned this in my release of Xenophon to Plato in the Nude, which needs to be updated again, back in 23. But at that time, I added two dialogs which I used for introduction and called the whole of it, Socrates in Chains. I included, Parmenides, as that work is heavely reference in the dialogs, and I also put in Alcibiades 1, learning how to distinguish the self from not self.
Now, some people, when they read the topic, perhaps think of parents, sibling's, or someone in the genealogy tree.
However, relatives are a given, any difference whatsoever.
And, all of behavior is learning how to parse relatives in order to make things. Things which amuse us, things to aid us in survival.
But however you look at it, we have just these two parts called the two parts of speech, even cause and effect, agent and patient, or even agent and passion.
All of reasoning, to all of arts, science and craft, is about applying our behavior in parsing these givens.
Now, something like that is how one should view any topic, what we do, voluntarily, or involuntarily, to any given relative.
Independent of these two parts of speech, are what is called judgment, what we can do, logically, mathematically, or capricely.
The intelligible operations do not tell you how to effect any perceptible operation, that is up to science and technology.
The intelligible is what our intelligence is based on, or standards of intelligible information parsing.
My machine is running on the project I call, The Apollo dialogs of Socrates. Something it seems goes unnoticed in the dialogs.
There are seven dialogs of Plato that start on the day after the first day of Apollo's Festival.
Theaetetus, Euthyphro, Apology, Sophist, Statesman, Crito and Phaedo.
So, I might be the first to make available those 7, in order, not only in videobook, but also ebook form.
Now, I mentioned this in my release of Xenophon to Plato in the Nude, which needs to be updated again, back in 23. But at that time, I added two dialogs which I used for introduction and called the whole of it, Socrates in Chains. I included, Parmenides, as that work is heavely reference in the dialogs, and I also put in Alcibiades 1, learning how to distinguish the self from not self.