Ding an sich
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2026 11:23 am
Ding an sich, or thing in of itself, cannot be known. You can find this fact explained by Plato, in his dream for a dream passage in Theaetetus.
It goes like this, As a thing is a binary, composed of stop go stop, or again, noun verb noun, which is the parsing of a relative difference as most computers parse electricity to form binary, we can name the stop, both ends of it, as a container, we can name the relative difference, or verb as that which is contained. But neither of these two parts of a thing are a thing in of itself. So, no name names any thing, they name the parts of things. A noun is the name of a container. Now most things are composed of multiple elative differences, which confuses people who expect things to be simple, and not complicated. The idea is, when you sum multiple relative differences, you still get one result, one container, like a fish bowl.
Secondly, each life support system uses a different relative difference, so, no life support system can do the job of the other, and each of them work by parsing relative differences, not things, but the limit is placed not on a limit, but on the relative difference, so, no life support system abstract things, they abstract relative differences.
What it means for grammar is that names are memory addressing systems. The reparsing of that information is called mathematics, reparsing to standards of relative differences which we use to construct other things.
The limit on a relative difference is always applied, while the relative difference is always a given.
One can then call a thing, a standard of behavior, as the relative difference or verb, is known as a behavior. A mind, by biological fact, functions by the standardization of behavior, just like a computer.
Not so much like Trump.
It goes like this, As a thing is a binary, composed of stop go stop, or again, noun verb noun, which is the parsing of a relative difference as most computers parse electricity to form binary, we can name the stop, both ends of it, as a container, we can name the relative difference, or verb as that which is contained. But neither of these two parts of a thing are a thing in of itself. So, no name names any thing, they name the parts of things. A noun is the name of a container. Now most things are composed of multiple elative differences, which confuses people who expect things to be simple, and not complicated. The idea is, when you sum multiple relative differences, you still get one result, one container, like a fish bowl.
Secondly, each life support system uses a different relative difference, so, no life support system can do the job of the other, and each of them work by parsing relative differences, not things, but the limit is placed not on a limit, but on the relative difference, so, no life support system abstract things, they abstract relative differences.
What it means for grammar is that names are memory addressing systems. The reparsing of that information is called mathematics, reparsing to standards of relative differences which we use to construct other things.
The limit on a relative difference is always applied, while the relative difference is always a given.
One can then call a thing, a standard of behavior, as the relative difference or verb, is known as a behavior. A mind, by biological fact, functions by the standardization of behavior, just like a computer.
Not so much like Trump.