The Arithmetic of Numbers
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2026 7:03 am
I have taken on the study of a college math book released in 2011.
The first thing I need to do is some research on the very first heading of Chapter 1.
The Arithmetic of Numbers
This implies, that someone, after some fashion, has found, in numbers, arithmetic itself. Now I am wondering how they found it. Was there some kind of archeological dig that they discovered Numbers somewhere and in those numbers they also found Arithmetic?
Being serious, the first thing I notice in this work is that the authors, for it does not sport an author, but is attributed to the college itself, is the mental affliction of simply renaming names, the authors have no clue as to what they are saying or the consequence of their words.
For example, can you actually add a name to a name to create a name? This should be, to anyone thinking, a self-referential fallacy, but not to a majority of writers who actually believe that these NOP statements are actually valid.
This is schizophrenia, confusing the intelligible with the perceptible. This form of schizophrenia is expressed as NOP operations in though, they are a gloss over in order to go from some point a to some point b with no real explanation.
Authors like this are a dime a dozen, they never ask such questions as, how many operations between two things can one perform in mathematics at one time, not realizing the answer they write out such bull shit as a + - a, factually listing two operations simultaneously between two values, contradicting the original naming convention.
Does place value notation start at - infinity? or does it stat at 0, and independent of any operations? The naming convening is always independent of any operational environment. If you confuse the two, you do not know what the fuck you are doing.
You cannot, in any manner claim that operations with names redefine the convention of names you are using. But, it is a mental flaw in almost all books teaching some system of grammar. One is denoting a lack of awareness between assigning names, and performing operations with those names.
The first thing I need to do is some research on the very first heading of Chapter 1.
The Arithmetic of Numbers
This implies, that someone, after some fashion, has found, in numbers, arithmetic itself. Now I am wondering how they found it. Was there some kind of archeological dig that they discovered Numbers somewhere and in those numbers they also found Arithmetic?
Being serious, the first thing I notice in this work is that the authors, for it does not sport an author, but is attributed to the college itself, is the mental affliction of simply renaming names, the authors have no clue as to what they are saying or the consequence of their words.
For example, can you actually add a name to a name to create a name? This should be, to anyone thinking, a self-referential fallacy, but not to a majority of writers who actually believe that these NOP statements are actually valid.
This is schizophrenia, confusing the intelligible with the perceptible. This form of schizophrenia is expressed as NOP operations in though, they are a gloss over in order to go from some point a to some point b with no real explanation.
Authors like this are a dime a dozen, they never ask such questions as, how many operations between two things can one perform in mathematics at one time, not realizing the answer they write out such bull shit as a + - a, factually listing two operations simultaneously between two values, contradicting the original naming convention.
Does place value notation start at - infinity? or does it stat at 0, and independent of any operations? The naming convening is always independent of any operational environment. If you confuse the two, you do not know what the fuck you are doing.
You cannot, in any manner claim that operations with names redefine the convention of names you are using. But, it is a mental flaw in almost all books teaching some system of grammar. One is denoting a lack of awareness between assigning names, and performing operations with those names.