Philosophy Now Forum

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 4:36 pm One of the items you can prove Geometrically, is that the literal, the arithmetic, and the metaphorical, the geometric, are reciprocally related.
What does that mean?

It means that people believe that they can render metaphor in any number of ways, it is not true. What it does mean, is what the metaphor stands for has one, and only one literal meaning or exactly the same definition.

That is how you render metaphor, not by pulling anything you want out of your ass, but by the ability to find the reciprocal literal which examples exactly the same definition.

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:29 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 4:36 pm One of the items you can prove Geometrically, is that the literal, the arithmetic, and the metaphorical, the geometric, are reciprocally related.
What does that mean?

It means that people believe that they can render metaphor in any number of ways, it is not true. What it does mean, is what the metaphor stands for has one, and only one literal meaning or exactly the same definition.

That is how you render metaphor, not by pulling anything you want out of your ass, but by the ability to find the reciprocal literal which examples exactly the same definition.

I won't abuse you, but as stated, using the English language, you're incorrect.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:32 pm

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:29 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 4:36 pm One of the items you can prove Geometrically, is that the literal, the arithmetic, and the metaphorical, the geometric, are reciprocally related.
What does that mean?

It means that people believe that they can render metaphor in any number of ways, it is not true. What it does mean, is what the metaphor stands for has one, and only one literal meaning or exactly the same definition.

That is how you render metaphor, not by pulling anything you want out of your ass, but by the ability to find the reciprocal literal which examples exactly the same definition.

I won't abuse you, but as stated, using the English language, you're incorrect.

There you go again

idiot.
Thank you!

Language us Universal
"Language us Universal", really?

and Intelligible, Grammar is Particular and Perceptible.
English Language is an oxymoron A member of a class is not the class of which it is a member.
I'm sorry Phil.

JamesIan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:41 pm Are you suggesting it's the equivalent of a thesaurus?

Using alternative wording and phrasing to express the same word (or in this case, symbolism and concepts).

Might have misunderstood this here.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:44 pm

JamesIan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:41 pm Are you suggesting it's the equivalent of a thesaurus?

Using alternative wording and phrasing to express the same word (or in this case, symbolism and concepts).

Might have misunderstood this here.

Information management is binary, as all grammars are.
They are also standards of behavior.
There is no dictionary today

with demonstrates
"with demonstrates", really phil?

any such standardization, but you can learn how, using Geometry as Plato and the Bible both note.

I does not allow
"I does not allow", really phil?

the misuse of binary recursion and you are forced to maintain your naming convention.
Look at it this way, you have a limited number of methods to measure, i.e., define any thing. We recursively use them, but tend to rename each particular use and end up only confusing ourselves into thinking that a difference in name is a real physical difference of measure.
So not to pick at you, but is English your first language? Your English grammar isn't quite making it Phil.

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:59 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:44 pm

JamesIan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:41 pm Are you suggesting it's the equivalent of a thesaurus?

Using alternative wording and phrasing to express the same word (or in this case, symbolism and concepts).

Might have misunderstood this here.

Information management is binary, as all grammars are.
They are also standards of behavior.
There is no dictionary today

with demonstrates
"with demonstrates", really phil?

any such standardization, but you can learn how, using Geometry as Plato and the Bible both note.

I does not allow
"I does not allow", really phil?

the misuse of binary recursion and you are forced to maintain your naming convention.
Look at it this way, you have a limited number of methods to measure, i.e., define any thing. We recursively use them, but tend to rename each particular use and end up only confusing ourselves into thinking that a difference in name is a real physical difference of measure.
So not to pick at you, but is English your first language? Your English grammar isn't quite making it Phil.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:02 pm

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:59 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:44 pm

Information management is binary, as all grammars are.
They are also standards of behavior.
There is no dictionary today

with demonstrates
"with demonstrates", really phil?

any such standardization, but you can learn how, using Geometry as Plato and the Bible both note.

I does not allow
"I does not allow", really phil?

the misuse of binary recursion and you are forced to maintain your naming convention.
Look at it this way, you have a limited number of methods to measure, i.e., define any thing. We recursively use them, but tend to rename each particular use and end up only confusing ourselves into thinking that a difference in name is a real physical difference of measure.
So not to pick at you, but is English your first language? Your English grammar isn't quite making it Phil.

Fantastic, good show, now you are groveling with typos.
What does the phrase chit chat mean?

Shit for brains.
Thank You!

You lick the bottom of the can like a pro.
Those two errors are in fact not typos. A typo is when you hit a wrong key, "with" is an actual word, which has nothing in common with "which," which would have made your statement correct.
And leaving out a word or words isn't a typo either.

Obviously your problem is knowledge or simply proof reading your message before sending, which is what I do.

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:11 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:02 pm

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:59 pm

Fantastic, good show, now you are groveling with typos.
What does the phrase chit chat mean?

Shit for brains.
Thank You!

You lick the bottom of the can like a pro.
Those two errors are in fact not typos. A typo is when you hit a wrong key, "with" is an actual word, which has nothing in common with "which," which would have made your statement correct.
And leaving out a word or words isn't a typo either.

Obviously your problem is knowledge or simply proof reading your message before sending, which is what I do.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:02 pm

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:59 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:44 pm

Information management is binary, as all grammars are.
They are also standards of behavior.
There is no dictionary today

with demonstrates
"with demonstrates", really phil?

any such standardization, but you can learn how, using Geometry as Plato and the Bible both note.

I does not allow
"I does not allow", really phil?

the misuse of binary recursion and you are forced to maintain your naming convention.
Look at it this way, you have a limited number of methods to measure, i.e., define any thing. We recursively use them, but tend to rename each particular use and end up only confusing ourselves into thinking that a difference in name is a real physical difference of measure.
So not to pick at you, but is English your first language? Your English grammar isn't quite making it Phil.

Fantastic, good show, now you are groveling with typos.
What does the phrase chit chat mean? Shit for brains.
You lick the bottom of the can like a pro.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:27 pm

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:02 pm

SpheresOfBalance wrote: ↑Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:59 pm

Fantastic, good show, now you are groveling with typos.
What does the phrase chit chat mean? Shit for brains.
You lick the bottom of the can like a pro.

You are poo throwing again. Call yourself an evolved man, oopsie daisy, your calibre meter is dipping quite significantly.