Page 1 of 2
Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 12:23 am
by Phil8659
In my encyclopedic work, The BAG (Basic Analog Grammar Sample Dictionary) The fourth and by far the largest division of each book of it, I use 6 different motions of a circle to show how to use it to make equations. Each equation involves a circle in motion. Some of those equations are not only several pages long, but some simply crashed Mathcad, the algebra became too complex for Mathcad. Some of them, on the other hand, are remarkably simple.
BAG is just a Sample Dictionary, even though there are several thousand pages.
So, what I am absolutely dreading, is this Rectification project I am now doing with Trig, a poor excuse for what I have done using simple geometry.
For one thing, Trigonometry gets the unit wrong, and even ignores their definition of it.
In geometry, you lay down any segment, and simply call it a unit. You then draw a circle from one correlative to the other, and learn that the diameter is twice the radius. i.e., it is the radius which is one, but in trig, they call the diameter 1, which is not at all right.
It is just so painful to read the trash, error upon error, the authors are ignorant of how to use words correctly.
Once one makes a gross error in reasoning, the progression of it becomes a cascading complex of errors, gibberish.
Sorting it all out, I know what has to happen. As anyone should know, mathematical operations work exactly the same independently of the nameing convention. But, if your naming convention is wrong, you make a cascading pile of shit.
Roll Away the Stone, is the name of the last chapter in each book, that chapter uses dynamic circles, instead of static.
The chapters for each book are laid out, lines, line and circle A, line and circle B, and then lines and dynamic circles.
There is no Cartesian Geometry, No Trig, No Calc. All of mathematics uses the same standard unit. So, I do not use these three, for not one of them is actually a grammar system.
Grammar is effected by binary recursion, thus not one of those are, by definition, a grammar.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 12:50 am
by Phil8659
Traditionally, scholars confuse the difference between a system of grammar, and an attempted application of a grammar to some particular area of study, thus they jargonize the grammars they use in their application, in order to elevate themselves, which is a typical response from a savage mind.
An intelligent mind, recursively applies their fundamental givens instead of multiplying words without wisdom.
Jargon hinders learning.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 1:47 am
by Phil8659
BAG consists of 7 volumes, each with the above four sections.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:22 am
by Age
Imagine just claiming you have done some things, but fail every time in just saying what 'it' is even for. Let alone the fact that you can not even just present what you have claimed to have done and explain 'it'.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:30 am
by Phil8659
Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:22 am
Imagine just claiming you have done some things, but fail every time in just saying what 'it' is even for. Let alone the fact that you can not even just present what you have claimed to have done and explain 'it'.
Really? Hundreds of people have found it, where I said it was on the archive, not one of them claim not to be able to read it, like you.
Is that not amazing? You are the only person, around the globe, who claims that they cannot find, read, or understand it.
That is why they call you special.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:40 am
by Phil8659
I never claimed to be a teacher, much less a teacher of special people.
My work is for those who can read Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry, all of which you claim have to be explained to you.
It ain't me babe, no, no, no, it ain't me babe, it is someone who can sell you a brain,
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:41 am
by accelafine
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:30 am
Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:22 am
Imagine just claiming you have done some things, but fail every time in just saying what 'it' is even for. Let alone the fact that you can not even just present what you have claimed to have done and explain 'it'.
Really? Hundreds of people have found it, where I said it was on the archive, not one of them claim not to be able to read it, like you.
Is that not amazing? You are the only person, around the globe, who claims that they cannot find, read, or understand it.
That is why they call you special.
Name one person who has read it and claims to understand it. You can't even say what 'it' is. I'm assuming you think it's some kind of secret language that 'god' speaks. I'm guessing that you are a hoarder whose home is stuffed to the ceiling with old-style computer hardrives and other parts.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:43 am
by Phil8659
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:41 am
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:30 am
Age wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:22 am
Imagine just claiming you have done some things, but fail every time in just saying what 'it' is even for. Let alone the fact that you can not even just present what you have claimed to have done and explain 'it'.
Really? Hundreds of people have found it, where I said it was on the archive, not one of them claim not to be able to read it, like you.
Is that not amazing? You are the only person, around the globe, who claims that they cannot find, read, or understand it.
That is why they call you special.
Name one person who has read it and claims to understand it. You can't even say what 'it' is. I'm assuming you think it's some kind of secret language that 'god' speaks. I'm guessing that you are a hoarder whose home is stuffed to the ceiling with old-style computer hardrives and other parts.
My previous post includes you, I did not leave you out.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:44 am
by accelafine
Why do you refuse to say what 'it' is? Are you embarrassed because even in your insanity you understand that it will sound ridiculous?
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:45 am
by Phil8659
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:44 am
Why do you refuse to say what 'it' is? Are you embarrassed because even in your insanity you understand that it will sound ridiculous?
Why is it you cannot use a fucking dictionary? Illiterate bitch.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:46 am
by accelafine
Why are we told that we need to pussyfoot around the insane? Indulge them out of 'kindness'? Fuck that. What we all need is a return to the days of mental asylums, where they don't have access to the internet.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:47 am
by accelafine
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:45 am
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:44 am
Why do you refuse to say what 'it' is? Are you embarrassed because even in your insanity you understand that it will sound ridiculous?
Why is it you cannot use a fucking dictionary? Illiterate bitch.
And look up what word, arsehole?
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:48 am
by Phil8659
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:47 am
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:45 am
accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:44 am
Why do you refuse to say what 'it' is? Are you embarrassed because even in your insanity you understand that it will sound ridiculous?
Why is it you cannot use a fucking dictionary? Illiterate bitch.
And look up 'what' word, arsehole?
Exactly what word is not in a dictionary, shit for brains?
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:52 am
by Phil8659
I do not run a school for the pathetically stupid.
Re: Roll Away The Stone
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:52 am
by accelafine
Since Age is 'god' and you have come up with a special language to communicate with 'god' then you two should get along nicely and have a spiffing time conversing with each other.