Philosophy Now Forum

Raymond Tallis argues against theist arguments in PN 99.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/101/Taking_Issue_with_The_God_Issue

42 aside, I believe that the lack of faith is a luxury

-Imp

Impenitent wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 12:47 pm 42 aside, I believe that the lack of faith is a luxury

-Imp

I'm curious.

Why resurrect this old issue?

What do you mean by 'the lack of faith is a luxury'?

amity_blu wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 3:34 pm

Impenitent wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 12:47 pm 42 aside, I believe that the lack of faith is a luxury

-Imp

I'm curious.

Why resurrect this old issue?

What do you mean by 'the lack of faith is a luxury'?

I didn't resurrect a thing

after re-reading the article, I merely mentioned another belief

-Imp

Impenitent wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 5:15 pm
after re-reading the article, I merely mentioned another belief

-Imp

How interesting.

Philosophy Now wrote: ↑Fri Oct 17, 2025 9:44 am Raymond Tallis argues against theist arguments in PN 99.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/101/Ta ... _God_Issue

Now, if we use common math. both sides have issue, which may then be deleted and we have.

Taking with the God.

Just as much a sentence fragment as an incomplete thought.
Do people really believe that taking an issue, which does not belong to you, is justice? Or that each time one uses common grammar, we have an issue, even an issue pandemic?
Exactly what is the God issue?