Philosophy Now Forum

In a conversation with AI there was an agreement that certain mathematical problems may be due to foundational issues.

Here is a reorganization of mathematical foundations where 1 = infinity = 0 using the following text posted in the metaphysics section under "The Perfect Form" (which gives further insight to a Platonic notion of the Perfect Form).

An infinite number of forms would be the same as nothing and if it is a thing it has a form. Picture a square. The square is surrounded by and filled with squares infinitely. The spaces between the squares is also filled with infinite squares and so on and so forth infinitely. A blankness results and yet there is an infinite number of squares while there only being the same square under an infinite number of contexts relative to itself as each square provides the context through which the other squares occur. The square is its own context. The blankness, the nothingness, is the same as the form, the same as the square. This is as the Daoist's say "the great square has no corners" and as the Buddhist's say "form is emptiness and emptiness is form". The form is perfect in these regards as there is nothing to be added to or taken away from as nothing can be subtracted from or added to nothingness for if this where so there would be no nothingness.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 4:03 pm In a conversation with AI there was an agreement that certain mathematical problems may be due to foundational issues.

Here is a reorganization of mathematical foundations where 1 = infinity = 0 using the following text posted in the metaphysics section under "The Perfect Form" (which gives further insight to a Platonic notion of the Perfect Form).

An infinite number of forms would be the same as nothing and if it is a thing it has a form.

If 'form' is some thing, then 'form' can be no thing, obviously.

So, whatever 'it' is that you, desperately, want to express and/or explain, here, fails from the very start.

And, if 1 equals infinity, there is some thing, or 1, and not nothing. So, infinity can not and does not equal 0.

Therefore, you need to start over, again.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 4:03 pm Picture a square. The square is surrounded by and filled with squares infinitely. The spaces between the squares is also filled with infinite squares and so on and so forth infinitely. A blankness results and yet there is an infinite number of squares while there only being the same square under an infinite number of contexts relative to itself as each square provides the context through which the other squares occur.

But, contrary to you claim, and belief, here, a 'blankness' does not 'result' at all, for the very fact that there 'are squares'.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 4:03 pm The square is its own context. The blankness, the nothingness, is the same as the form, the same as the square.

But, squares and form is not nothing, obviously.

you are stuck on, and with, a belief, here, that you are very desperately 'trying to' find 'the words', which you hope will, and are, supporting 'your belief'. But, 'your belief' is just plain old False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect. Full stop. And, as I just showed and proved above, here.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 4:03 pm This is as the Daoist's say "the great square has no corners" and as the Buddhist's say "form is emptiness and emptiness is form". The form is perfect in these regards as there is nothing to be added to or taken away from as nothing can be subtracted from or added to nothingness for if this where so there would be no nothingness.

And, as there is some thing, like, for example, 'form', itself, there is therefore no such thing as only nothing, or nothingness. But, 'you' are yet to explain to the readers, here, what the word, 'nothingness' means nor is even referring to, exactly, to you.