Philosophy Now Forum

What would be the best book on Christianity for an atheist?

One with the valid proof that god does not exist.

Missing valid evidence for god's nonexistence is the atheist's Pain Point. For thousands of years, they have been arguing with theists about god's existence, but can't get past the word-against-word stalemate.

I have discovered the first valid evidence that god does NOT exist because that is not possible. In fact, in my new book series "It's Finally PROVEN! God Does NOT Exist The FIRST valid EVIDENCE in History", I present four pieces of evidence, scientific, logical, ontological, and experiential.

Read more about this breakthrough and game-changing book series on my webpage https://god-doesntexist.com/

P.S. I presented three objective pieces of evidence (the fourth one is subjective but fully supports and reinforces the first three) to multiple AIs - ChatGPT and Claude, and both acknowledged that they are logically irrefutable.

You can't prove that something doesn't exist. That's the whole point. The only possible 'evidence' for non-existence is a lack of evidence. 'God' isn't supposed to provide evidence either. That's what the word 'faith' is all about. This is probably the most ridiculous thread title to date.

So where is the 'planet Palki'?

"After we abolished the Evil Karmic Organization, our new Cosmic Administration is now taking care of the newly created 2.000 galaxies with 200.000 new planets. Only Earth is still out of our new space family because it is temporarily blocked."
Who is we?

I thought this section was for articles

-Imp

Well yeah, but then this is supposed to be a philosophy forum.

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am What would be the best book on Christianity for an atheist?

One with the valid proof that god does not exist.

Would 'valid proof' that God does not exist, even exist in a book on a 'religion', which states and claims that God does exist?

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am Missing valid evidence for god's nonexistence is the atheist's Pain Point. For thousands of years, they have been arguing with theists about god's existence, but can't get past the word-against-word stalemate.

And, this is just because both the so-called "atheist" and "theist", still, do not yet know what the word, God, means and/nor is referring to, exactly.

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am I have discovered the first valid evidence that god does NOT exist because that is not possible. In fact, in my new book series "It's Finally PROVEN! God Does NOT Exist The FIRST valid EVIDENCE in History", I present four pieces of evidence, scientific, logical, ontological, and experiential.

If you are only providing 'evidence', then how could 'it' be so-called 'finally proven'?

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am Read more about this breakthrough and game-changing book series on my webpage https://god-doesntexist.com/

P.S. I presented three objective pieces of evidence (the fourth one is subjective but fully supports and reinforces the first three) to multiple AIs - ChatGPT and Claude, and both acknowledged that they are logically irrefutable.

So, why is 'your finally proven' not taking off and being accepted and agreed with by every one?

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 7:05 am So where is the 'planet Palki'?

Will you describe 'what' you call, 'planet Palki', is, exactly, and as best you can, and then explain 'where' this 'planet Palki' is, exactly?

If no, then 'I' can not inform 'you' of 'where' the so-called 'planet Palki' is.

But, if yes, then 'I' can tell 'you'.

See, if you want to claim some thing exists, and you want to claim that 'your claim' is true, then you, first need to inform others of who and/or what 'it' is, exactly, and then if you really want to gather agreement and acceptance, then you need to explain where 'it' can be found, exactly.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 6:58 am You can't prove that something doesn't exist. That's the whole point. The only possible 'evidence' for non-existence is a lack of evidence. 'God' isn't supposed to provide evidence either. That's what the word 'faith' is all about. This is probably the most ridiculous thread title to date.

Yes, you can. It is enough to prove that something can't exist, so it does not exist. God can not exist, so he doesn't.

Lack of evidence is not evidence.

Religious believers like Christians (check apologists Frank Turek) translate "faith" as trust. For those who believe, but do not know, that god exists, having faith in god is the same as having trust in god.

While the idea that god and faith exclude each other is interesting, they believe god exists, and have faith in him. Or more precisely, they believe god exists because they have faith in him.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 7:05 am So where is the 'planet Palki'?

Planet Palki is in the 4. dimension, right above us. It is very similar to Earth, with the same states, languages, and cultures. Population: almost 1 billion.

10% of Palkies incarnated on Earth. That means that approximately 800 million Earthlings are dreaming on the dream version of their planet.

If you want to check my statement, learn or use lucid dreaming, and you will easily confirm my claims.

https://god-doesntexist.com/lucid-dream ... in-dreams/

Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 1:57 pm "After we abolished the Evil Karmic Organization, our new Cosmic Administration is now taking care of the newly created 2.000 galaxies with 200.000 new planets. Only Earth is still out of our new space family because it is temporarily blocked."
Who is we?

We are the new Cosmic Administration, a multidimensional team that abolished the Evil Karmic organization and established a new model of life in Good. We will present ourselves publicly after the end of the planetary blockade. Here is a short presentation. Below is a link to the whole article.

Cosmic Administration: Friends of the New Cosmos

A new Cosmic Administration with its co-administrators runs our part of the cosmos from the 3rd to the 15th dimension:

1. The Galactics, who look after the galaxies (each with 10 solar systems”;

2. The Solarics, who look after the solar systems (each with 10 planets);

3. The Supraplanetarians (each group looks after its planet); and

4. The Planetary Councils, the Country and city governments.

The new Cosmic Administration is working for the common benefit of all inhabitants in our wonderful new cosmos. We have helped everyone, and we will help Earthlings, too.

We are Friends of this cosmos, a multi-planetary and multidimensional team of top experts in different fields. On the first day, we will introduce ourselves to you at the liberation of the planet. We will address you over the capital cities, and later in the planetary Info Center, where we will report daily on the migration of Earthlings to new planets.

If we decide to uplift all Earthlings at once, we will address you in a special program you will watch on TV in your new house on the new planet.

https://god-doesntexist.com/cosmic-administration/

Impenitent wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 2:29 pm I thought this section was for articles

-Imp

There are shorter and there are longer articles.

It is the message, not necessarily the form.

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:11 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 6:58 am You can't prove that something doesn't exist. That's the whole point. The only possible 'evidence' for non-existence is a lack of evidence. 'God' isn't supposed to provide evidence either. That's what the word 'faith' is all about. This is probably the most ridiculous thread title to date.

Yes, you can. It is enough to prove that something can't exist, so it does not exist. God can not exist, so he doesn't.

Why did you just say and claim that God is a "he", as though there is a "he" existing somewhere?

Also, one might be able to prove that some 'thing' does not exist in a room, a house, or a hospital for example. But, the bigger 'the area', then the harder and more complex it becomes to prove that a 'thing' does not exist. And, considering the actual size of the Universe, Itself, it might well be impossible to prove some thing does not exist in the Universe, somewhere.

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:11 am Lack of evidence is not evidence.

Religious believers like Christians (check apologists Frank Turek) translate "faith" as trust. For those who believe, but do not know, that god exists, having faith in god is the same as having trust in god.

While the idea that god and faith exclude each other is interesting, they believe god exists, and have faith in him.

And, you believe God does not exist, and only believe you know God does not exist, while also not having faith in "him". Which makes me wonder why 'you' would call God a male gendered Thing to even begin with.

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:11 am Or more precisely, they believe god exists because they have faith in him.

And, you believe God does not exist because you have faith in your own beliefs, correct?

Age wrote: ↑Sat Oct 04, 2025 5:41 am

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am What would be the best book on Christianity for an atheist?

One with the valid proof that god does not exist.

Would 'valid proof' that God does not exist, even exist in a book on a 'religion', which states and claims that God does exist?

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am
Yes, it could, if the author were an honest man accepting the validity of proof.


Missing valid evidence for god's nonexistence is the atheist's Pain Point. For thousands of years, they have been arguing with theists about god's existence, but can't get past the word-against-word stalemate.

And, this is just because both the so-called "atheist" and "theist", still, do not yet know what the word, God, means and/nor is referring to, exactly.

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am
There are enough ideas, descriptions, and explanations of what god is. One of them, and common to many religions, is that god is the Creator of the World and the Master of Life and Death. My valid evidence covers all of them.

I have discovered the first valid evidence that god does NOT exist because that is not possible. In fact, in my new book series "It's Finally PROVEN! God Does NOT Exist The FIRST valid EVIDENCE in History", I present four pieces of evidence, scientific, logical, ontological, and experiential.

If you are only providing 'evidence', then how could 'it' be so-called 'finally proven'?

Senad Dizdarevic wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 5:01 am Read more about this breakthrough and game-changing book series on my webpage https://god-doesntexist.com/

P.S. I presented three objective pieces of evidence (the fourth one is subjective but fully supports and reinforces the first three) to multiple AIs - ChatGPT and Claude, and both acknowledged that they are logically irrefutable.

Finally means that many tried to prove that god does not exist, but they couldn't.

For example, Dawkins said that god probably doesn't exist.

On the theists' side, just "arguments" or empty words for the existence of god. On the atheist's side, just assumptions.

Valid evidence has absolute value, and my has it. Solipsists can argue, but to whom?

So, why is 'your finally proven' not taking off and being accepted and agreed with by every one?

It will when readers read, accept, and agree with it.

The series has 4 parts. I present 3 pieces of objective evidence in the 4th book (the fourth is subjective - experiental). The e-book is 9.99$. If you can refute the first 3 with a logical explanation, I will refund you. https://god-doesntexist.com/

Or, recommend the books to your local library and borrow the whole series.

Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Fri Oct 03, 2025 3:43 pm Well yeah, but then this is supposed to be a philosophy forum.

The existence of god is one of the top philosophical themes.