Philosophy Now Forum

1. The "Te" of Taoism is the "Actuality" of Aristotle.

2. The "Tao" of Taoism is the "Potentiality" of Aristotle.

1a. The "Te/Actuality" distinctions are the "Forms" of Plato.

2a. The "Tao/Potentiality" distinctions are the "Ineffable" of Plato.

1b. The "Te/Actuality/Form" distinctions are the "Emmanations" of Monism.

2b. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable" distinctions are the "One" of Monism.

1c. The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation" distinctions are "Osiris" of Egyptian Myth.

2c. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One" distinctions are "Isis" of Egyptian Myth.

1d. The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation/Osiris" distinctions are the "gods" of Socrates.

2d. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One/Isis" distinctions are the "Formless" of Socrates.

1e. The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation/Osiris/Gods" distinctions are the "1" of binary code.

2e. The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One/Isis/Formless" distinctions are the "0" of binary code.

3. 1-1e are effectively recursive process by which distinction occurs.

4. 2-2e are effectively the point that occurs recursively



I not entirely sold on it....something seems off.


Thoughts?

prime meridian

-Imp

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 4:46 am The "Te" of Taoism is the "Actuality" of Aristotle.

The "Tao" of Taoism is the "Potentiality" of Aristotle.

The "Te/Actuality" distinctions are the "Forms" of Plato.

The "Tao/Potentiality" distinctions are the "Ineffable" of Plato.

The "Te/Actuality/Form" distinctions are the "Emmanations" of Monism.

The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable" distinctions are the "One" of Monism.

The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation" distinctions are "Osiris" of Egyptian Myth.

The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One" distinctions are "Isis" of Egyptian Myth.



I not entirely sold on it....something seems off.


Thoughts?

Nothing is off.

Something seems on.

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 1:36 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 26, 2025 4:46 am The "Te" of Taoism is the "Actuality" of Aristotle.

The "Tao" of Taoism is the "Potentiality" of Aristotle.

The "Te/Actuality" distinctions are the "Forms" of Plato.

The "Tao/Potentiality" distinctions are the "Ineffable" of Plato.

The "Te/Actuality/Form" distinctions are the "Emmanations" of Monism.

The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable" distinctions are the "One" of Monism.

The "Te/Actuality/Form/Emmanation" distinctions are "Osiris" of Egyptian Myth.

The "Tao/Potentiality/Ineffable/One" distinctions are "Isis" of Egyptian Myth.



I not entirely sold on it....something seems off.


Thoughts?

Nothing is off.

Something seems on.

It is not clear enough, the assertion I presented. Something is missing. ****It's updated.