Page 1 of 2
All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 3:42 am
by Eodnhoj7
All assertions are multilayered, there is no fixed meaning to any one assertion outside of specific context.
With multiple contexts an assertion has multiple meanings.
Multiple meanings is superpositioned intention within the psyche by form of language.
By context is an assertion revealed, without context an assertion is ambiguous, absent of meaning.
Context is a layer to an assertion, by context an assertion is or is not.
Truth is fixed within a given context, but context is not fixed.
Context dependency necessitates truth as paradoxical when multiple contexts are present.
The simpler the truth the greater the variety of meaning, the simpler the truth the greater it mirrors the observers perception.
Simplicity results in division of truths for contradictory interpretations, by nature of projection, are revealed.
A simple truth is but a mirror, a reflection of many things.
To pursue a universal truth would effectively result in a truth with innumerable dimensions by nature of innumerable meanings, context could not hold it for the context would depend upon it in one respect while limiting the truth by nature of context.
Context gives dimension to truth, with increased context comes increase dimension, by dimension is a truth distinct from other truths but given context gives dimension and contexts can contradict, context divides a simple truth into a contradictory state thus by relativism comes a multitude of absolute truths, in some respects, thus leaving the simplest truth, underlying all, being the distinction of context.
If truth is contextual, and this is a truth, then truth B as a context for truth A inversely makes truth A a context for truth B. Context is relative, all truths are potentially contexts for all truths.
Context is the limit of truth, in themselves all contexts are absolute as they are a self referencing loops. Without context truth has no limit, no meaning.
If context depends upon context and truth dependent upon truth than a context is state of superpositioning where attention and intention provides the dimension of a truth amidst infinite possibilities. Truth thus is an assertion of attention where actuality is derived from infinite potentiality.
Truth is superpositioned meanings until attentive perception forms it as either a distinct meaning or finite layered meanings.
Meaning is truth by nature of relative contexts being a new context and yet truth is layered thus meaning equates to potential new truths by virtue of new contexts to define it as a context.
Truth is not fixed and yet manifests as contexts, one context to another necessitates truth as a process of transformation.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 6:57 am
by puto
Belief - Adequacy - Truth = A Justified True Belief. Sceptics Doubt: Any beliefs, beliefs are true, and beliefs are justified. So, no possibility of knowledge. Philosophy is about possibilities. The argument from 'Ignorance' is shown to be unsound with perceptual Possibility: S knows that q, iff S believes it is possible that q. Epistemology is to show how knowledge is possible. Knowledge of a certain kind is possible.
'2 + 2 = 4' is a true proposition. An analytical truth the subject is in the predicate. There is no possibility of that being wrong calculation.
Perceptual by taking two apples, and adding two apples, equals four apples. The external world is apparent in calculations.
Possible, if not necessarily false in the correlative sense.
So, subjective, ruling out luck and accident, and objective. The possibility that one cannot possibly be wrong. Chance in acquiring knowledge. Impossible to conceive of its being false. Epistemology is possible in a that clause.
Eodnhoj7, you are definitely a classical philosopher.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 6:59 am
by puto
puto wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 6:57 am
Belief - Adequacy - Truth = A Justified True Belief. Sceptics Doubt: Any beliefs, beliefs are true, and beliefs are justified. So, no possibility of knowledge. Philosophy is about possibilities. The argument from 'Ignorance' is shown to be unsound with perceptual Possibility:
S knows that
q, iff
S believes it is possible that
q. Epistemology is to show how knowledge is possible. Knowledge of a certain kind is possible.
'2 + 2 = 4' is a true proposition. An analytical truth the subject is in the predicate. There is no possibility of that being wrong calculation.
Perceptual by taking two apples, and adding two apples, equals four apples. The external world is apparent in calculations.
Possible, if not necessarily false in the correlative sense.
So, subjective, ruling out luck and accident, and objective. The possibility that one cannot possibly be wrong. Chance in acquiring knowledge. Impossible to conceive of its being false. Epistemology is possible in a
that clause.
Eodnhoj7, you are definitely a classical philosopher.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:36 am
by puto
What the justified true belief analysis suggests is that when the sceptic doubts the possibility of knowledge it is by raising doubts about the justification condition.
Gascoigne, Neil. "Scepticism and Knowledge,"
"Scepticism," Acumen Publishing Limited, 2002, pp.17, Print.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 7:39 am
by puto
Truth is God, and this God is benevolent. Pascals Wager, but God does not gamble, but wager with all your belief that your belief is true. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain, in a loose paraphrase of Pascals wager. What you believe and how you get there is your choice. Choose wisely, but use your choice.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:17 am
by puto
Pascal’s Wager was based on practical consequences of belief or nonbelief not existence or nonexistence.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 4:11 am
by Eodnhoj7
puto wrote: ↑Tue Aug 12, 2025 8:17 am
Pascal’s Wager was based on practical consequences of belief or nonbelief not existence or nonexistence.
Regardless of whether or not one believes, or what they believe or disbelieve, what is consistent within the nature of belief is the act of distinction of the belief and the distinctions which come from the belief/non-belief....and this nature of distinction spans across all experiential phenomena thus relegating belief/non-belief to a form of psychological architecture in the respect it is compounded or layered distinctions.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:09 am
by puto
Probability and Pascal: The event of the likelihood of the event occurring. Genuine religious faith was a pure gift from God. Pascal's Wager was a Pragmatic approach. You have a probability. With '1 + 1 = 3', you can form a belief for its benefits. '1 + 1 = 2', is the obvious truth and analytically true. Pascal was never trained in philosophy. Pascal knew about human choices, such as evil is to bad, as wicked is to immoral. Pascal knew language and mathematics. Personal choice.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2025 4:32 am
by Eodnhoj7
puto wrote: ↑Wed Aug 13, 2025 8:09 am
Probability and Pascal: The event of the likelihood of the event occurring. Genuine religious faith was a pure gift from God. Pascal's Wager was a Pragmatic approach. You have a probability. With '1 + 1 = 3', you can form a belief for its benefits. '1 + 1 = 2', is the obvious truth and analytically true. Pascal was never trained in philosophy. Pascal knew about human choices, such as evil is to bad, as wicked is to immoral. Pascal knew language and mathematics. Personal choice.
Pascal was relatively successful precisely because he was not trained in philosophy. He was not limited by dogma.
Any who...devil's advocate approach:
If truth is purely probalistic, is this truth purely probabilistic?
And:
Relative to mathematical analogies: math is purely contextual.
In certain contexts, the prevalent one in this case, 1+1=2. I am stating the obvious.
Change the context and the nature changes. 1+1=3 is possible within a given context. I can explain the case for it if you wish.
So....
Absolute truth occurs within contexts....and you are right in many respects about personal choice being a crux. Contextulization is expression of choice.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2025 8:02 am
by puto
Doubting, is thinking, then of the JTB. The sceptical meaning ‘seek and keep an open mind’ is to p-know. Being, a problematic sceptic about dogmatism is justified. Being, too problematic is annoying. You do not want knowledge, but arguments and not about the reasons behind them. I am learning very slowly about scepticism from you. Doubting, is as it seems very annoying. Descartes’ beginning the Enlightenment period put it as if to learn and think by being ‘indubitable’.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2025 11:12 am
by Eodnhoj7
puto wrote: ↑Thu Aug 14, 2025 8:02 am
Doubting, is thinking, then of the JTB. The sceptical meaning ‘seek and keep an open mind’ is to
p-know. Being, a problematic sceptic about dogmatism is justified. Being, too problematic is annoying. You do not want knowledge, but arguments and not about the reasons behind them. I am learning very slowly about scepticism from you. Doubting, is as it seems very annoying. Descartes’ beginning the Enlightenment period put it as if to learn and think by being ‘indubitable’.
You are conflating "doubt/skepticism" with "paradox"....this is not wrong but neither is it the full picture. As I said elsewhere: pure doubt inverts to belief for doubt is doubted, pure belief inverts to doubt for doubt is believed. Doubt and belief happen simultaneously if one does not go to either extreme.
All distinctions are paradoxical by nature of being both the act of connection and seperation simultaneously. Knowledge is distinction making.
In one respect:
One observes a chair by it being the connection of the things which compose the chair while seperation of the chair from the table, floor etc.
In another respect:
1. Seperation:
1a. The chair is distinct because it is not a table.
1b. The table is distinct because it is not a chair.
2. Connection:
2a. The chair only exists within the context of the table.
2b. The table only exists within the context of the chair.
These things, connection and seperation, happen simultaneously.
Paradox is an inherent part of knowledge, by nature of distinction and should be seen as 'rational' given a ratio of thesis and antithesis or opposites. Paradox is an act of transformation thus an integral part of existence.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2025 11:49 pm
by boyjohn
? 2 + 2 =4 an ultimate truth could be in our universe. But does that make it absolute. could be you do not have 2+ 2 apples = 4 apples. Could be you just have four apples or just apples. Mathematics is essentially our invention to help us understand . In another universe they may have no need of our mathematics. Thus even an assumed ultimate cannot be assumed as absolute?
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2025 1:24 am
by Eodnhoj7
boyjohn wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 11:49 pm
? 2 + 2 =4 an ultimate truth could be in our universe. But does that make it absolute. could be you do not have 2+ 2 apples = 4 apples. Could be you just have four apples or just apples. Mathematics is essentially our invention to help us understand . In another universe they may have no need of our mathematics. Thus even an assumed ultimate cannot be assumed as absolute?
Absolute truth is absolute by context. Change the context and there is a new absolute truth. Both absolutes exist...infinite absolutes exist.
Example:
1. 2+2=4 is correct when observing 2 and 2 as a superpositioned set, 4 in this case.
2. 2+2=5 is correct when observing 2 and 2 as 4, and 4 being the 5th set as it is its own set.
3. 2+2=7 is correct when observing 2 and 2 as 4, where 2,2,4 result in a relative seven sets.
4. Etc...
The context of context application determines absolute truth...all of these truths are absolute within a given context.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2025 10:12 am
by popeye1945
There is no absolute truth; truth is experience and understanding, bringing forth a true meaning. This true meaning is true to the body having the experience and is as fallible as the body. Alter the body, and you alter the experience of truth. Biological truth experience does not necessarily agree with the conditions of the physical world, but only with the subject's body.
Re: All Truth is Multidimensional
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2025 2:02 am
by Eodnhoj7
popeye1945 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 04, 2025 10:12 am
There is no absolute truth; truth is experience and understanding, bringing forth a true meaning. This true meaning is true to the body having the experience and is as fallible as the body. Alter the body, and you alter the experience of truth. Biological truth experience does not necessarily agree with the conditions of the physical world, but only with the subject's body.
Truth is absolute within a given context. 1+1=2 is absolute within context. This is an absolute relative.
Pure absolute truth would be nothingness, void. The same with pure relativity.
And yet we see void relatively within the absence of things by which other things occur. This is a relative absolute.