Thread for Kenny and Fairy to hijack for their foreplay
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2025 12:56 am
Philosophy Now Forum
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Thread for Kenny and Fairy to hijack for their foreplay
Page 1 of 12
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:32 am
Talk about presenting another prime example of people completely contradicting "themselves" when they are 'trying to' describe things, which they do not yet fully understand and know them.accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 25, 2025 12:56 am 'Now' is an illusion. Past, present and future coexist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsw99SSwKc
For the religious nuts on here this is not a 'subjective opinion'. GPS has to be constantly adjusted to compensate for relativity.
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:44 am
I didn't watch the video but yeah, I think that's probably true, and I think relativity at least weakly supports that idea (maybe strongly)accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 25, 2025 12:56 am 'Now' is an illusion. Past, present and future coexist.
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:54 am
The B is for Bollocks theory of time, becoz RoS, is specious nonsense. In the same ball park as arguments for God, free will and objective morality.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:44 amI didn't watch the video but yeah, I think that's probably true, and I think relativity at least weakly supports that idea (maybe strongly)accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 25, 2025 12:56 am 'Now' is an illusion. Past, present and future coexist.
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:56 am
Have you had a stroke? Your posts are getting more and more incoherent (and they never made any sense at the best of times).Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:54 amThe B is for Bollocks theory of time, becoz RoS, is specious nonsense. In the same ball park as arguments for God, free will and objective morality.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:44 amI didn't watch the video but yeah, I think that's probably true, and I think relativity at least weakly supports that idea (maybe strongly)accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 25, 2025 12:56 am 'Now' is an illusion. Past, present and future coexist.
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:57 am
Says I'm on his 'foe list' then comments on my thread 
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:57 am
Relativity of simultaneity? Why? Why do you feel so strongly that it must be incorrect?Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:54 amThe B is for Bollocks theory of time, becoz RoS, is specious nonsense. In the same ball park as arguments for God, free will and objective morality.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:44 amI didn't watch the video but yeah, I think that's probably true, and I think relativity at least weakly supports that idea (maybe strongly)accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Jul 25, 2025 12:56 am 'Now' is an illusion. Past, present and future coexist.
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:10 am
I know it's correct. How it demonstrates in any way that the future of infinity is all present and correct, isn't even wrong to the point of being on the cusp of hysterically amusing.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:57 amRelativity of simultaneity? Why? Why do you feel so strongly that it must be incorrect?Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:54 amThe B is for Bollocks theory of time, becoz RoS, is specious nonsense. In the same ball park as arguments for God, free will and objective morality.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:44 am
I didn't watch the video but yeah, I think that's probably true, and I think relativity at least weakly supports that idea (maybe strongly)
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:17 am
Oh I see.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:10 amI know it's correct. How it demonstrates in any way that the future of infinity is all present and correct, isn't even wrong to the point of being on the cusp of hysterically amusing.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:57 amRelativity of simultaneity? Why? Why do you feel so strongly that it must be incorrect?Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:54 am
The B is for Bollocks theory of time, becoz RoS, is specious nonsense. In the same ball park as arguments for God, free will and objective morality.
Do you think it at least supports the notion that there's not an objective "now"?
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:21 am
Why are you asking that old fool? Just watch the video.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:17 amOh I see.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:10 amI know it's correct. How it demonstrates in any way that the future of infinity is all present and correct, isn't even wrong to the point of being on the cusp of hysterically amusing.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:57 am
Relativity of simultaneity? Why? Why do you feel so strongly that it must be incorrect?
Do you think it at least supports the notion that there's not an objective "now"?
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:22 am
Talk about a prime example of hypocrisy, here.
Imagine laughing at another for doing the exact same thing you do.
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:23 am
Of course it does. Absolute reality is meaningless, even for each dimensionless point of existence. I know this with absolute certainty.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:17 amOh I see.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:10 amI know it's correct. How it demonstrates in any way that the future of infinity is all present and correct, isn't even wrong to the point of being on the cusp of hysterically amusing.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:57 am
Relativity of simultaneity? Why? Why do you feel so strongly that it must be incorrect?
Do you think it at least supports the notion that there's not an objective "now"?
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:23 am
Because this is a discussion forum and I think I actually have a pretty good argument for why we can go from relativity of simultaneity to no objective now to all moments exist at once.accelafine wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:21 amWhy are you asking that old fool? Just watch the video.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:17 amOh I see.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:10 am
I know it's correct. How it demonstrates in any way that the future of infinity is all present and correct, isn't even wrong to the point of being on the cusp of hysterically amusing.
Do you think it at least supports the notion that there's not an objective "now"?
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:24 am
Don't you think that already implies that future moments are as real as the present?Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:23 amOf course it does. Absolute reality is meaningless, even for each dimensionless point of existence. I know this with absolute certainty.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:17 amOh I see.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:10 am
I know it's correct. How it demonstrates in any way that the future of infinity is all present and correct, isn't even wrong to the point of being on the cusp of hysterically amusing.
Do you think it at least supports the notion that there's not an objective "now"?
Re: Relax. You've already died.
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:24 am
Another prime example of another one not yet knowing what the word 'objectivity' refers to, exactly.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:17 amOh I see.Martin Peter Clarke wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 10:10 amI know it's correct. How it demonstrates in any way that the future of infinity is all present and correct, isn't even wrong to the point of being on the cusp of hysterically amusing.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:57 am
Relativity of simultaneity? Why? Why do you feel so strongly that it must be incorrect?
Do you think it at least supports the notion that there's not an objective "now"?