Axioms are Appearances
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2025 11:15 am
Given self evidence is the observation of the occurence of a conceptualization that appears strictly for what it is as an occurence, and there are innumerable conceptualizations that occur, then there are innumerable axioms resulting in an axiom merely being an appearance of a distinction within the mind where any set of axioms can be derived as a pivotal foundational point of interpreting experience necessitating the relationships of these axioms are axioms within axioms as an axiom.
Axioms are merely cyclically progressive self justifications that maintain there coherency by uncountable relations that give rise to an appearance of coherency induced clarity reflecting an impression of order further relegating what is percieved as rational being simply an impressionable experience where things are justified by nature of being distinct.
Under these terms truth value becomes a process of distinction justified by appearance where appearance is the foundational essence of what is deemed true further cycling to a self prescribed paradox given any distinct essence is relegated to mere appearance by virtue of its occurence and transient interconnected nature.
Axioms are merely cyclically progressive self justifications that maintain there coherency by uncountable relations that give rise to an appearance of coherency induced clarity reflecting an impression of order further relegating what is percieved as rational being simply an impressionable experience where things are justified by nature of being distinct.
Under these terms truth value becomes a process of distinction justified by appearance where appearance is the foundational essence of what is deemed true further cycling to a self prescribed paradox given any distinct essence is relegated to mere appearance by virtue of its occurence and transient interconnected nature.