What is X, Y
Posted: Tue May 06, 2025 10:20 pm
Looking at the post What is the concept of God, philosophically, makes me sad. How can one be a grown up and not know that the question is not a product of a literate person?
What is the, short for what is that, that being a gesture. In the perceptible, we point to, or nod in a given direction. It denotes the source of the topic, more often than not, a geographical location. In all events, once it has been agreed upon, often tacitly, it is used to denote an agreed upon memory reference, i.e., denotes that something has a prior shared experience about a particular.
What sense is denoted for the equality? philosophically. Really? We can answer using any particular sense, or in one of four particular grammar systems. But, what the fuck is, Philosophically, what is the, or that concept of God mean? Gibberish.
If I ask what is that, I am asking about a perceptible, which can be pointed to, or some intelligible, which has become a shared experience in memory. Or, I can fully describe something, using commonly shared memories of similar items, fictional construct from many memories of similar items.
But there is still no such thing as a philosophical answer, because philosophy is inclusive of every grammar system.
Y, what is X. Is construct which is not common, It means, Using the particular identity Y, such as sight, sound, touch, etc, what is the information X.
Visually, What is a square?
Audio, What is Joan Baez?
This has been covered, I believe by Plato, Y, What is X. Where Y denotes what sense is used to gather the information. In that sense, the answer can be given.
In the first example, I draw a square,
In the second, I play a recording.
In no case, does one claim that the answer can be given equally in the wrong sense. No matter how many words in common grammar you can spout out, you will not produce a visual square.
Nor, no matter how many words you paste together will you ever produce a memory of a song.
Memory is the preservation of parsed perceptions, The tools we use to manage memory is not the memory managed.
A great revealer of illiteracy is when one askes to make the one into the other as if everyone is a fucking magician.
Grammar is for information management. There is acquisition and retrieval. There is no magic in it, unless one is illiterate. Both can be either perceptible or intelligible. When asked to retrieve a memory, one has to know which format can actually do the job.
What is the, short for what is that, that being a gesture. In the perceptible, we point to, or nod in a given direction. It denotes the source of the topic, more often than not, a geographical location. In all events, once it has been agreed upon, often tacitly, it is used to denote an agreed upon memory reference, i.e., denotes that something has a prior shared experience about a particular.
What sense is denoted for the equality? philosophically. Really? We can answer using any particular sense, or in one of four particular grammar systems. But, what the fuck is, Philosophically, what is the, or that concept of God mean? Gibberish.
If I ask what is that, I am asking about a perceptible, which can be pointed to, or some intelligible, which has become a shared experience in memory. Or, I can fully describe something, using commonly shared memories of similar items, fictional construct from many memories of similar items.
But there is still no such thing as a philosophical answer, because philosophy is inclusive of every grammar system.
Y, what is X. Is construct which is not common, It means, Using the particular identity Y, such as sight, sound, touch, etc, what is the information X.
Visually, What is a square?
Audio, What is Joan Baez?
This has been covered, I believe by Plato, Y, What is X. Where Y denotes what sense is used to gather the information. In that sense, the answer can be given.
In the first example, I draw a square,
In the second, I play a recording.
In no case, does one claim that the answer can be given equally in the wrong sense. No matter how many words in common grammar you can spout out, you will not produce a visual square.
Nor, no matter how many words you paste together will you ever produce a memory of a song.
Memory is the preservation of parsed perceptions, The tools we use to manage memory is not the memory managed.
A great revealer of illiteracy is when one askes to make the one into the other as if everyone is a fucking magician.
Grammar is for information management. There is acquisition and retrieval. There is no magic in it, unless one is illiterate. Both can be either perceptible or intelligible. When asked to retrieve a memory, one has to know which format can actually do the job.