Philosophy Now Forum

It is written, that mankind will be the Savior of Life on this planet, so why does most religions claim that it is something else, even just one man?

A mind is a life support system. It is potentially the most powerful one possible for it allows us to predict the outcome of complex situations, i.e., every grammar is purposed to learn and use predictability, or again prophecy. Now, as demonstrated globally, binary grammar can process all information, when properly programmed. In short, a mind has to master two, and only two concepts.
Today there is no globally recognized standard for grammar systems, even though the computer is demonstrating it around the world.
So, does this indicate that the mind of man is functional, or is it still simply dysfunctional?

Mankind is still mentally incapable of doing his biologically defined job. The only possible way to change that is to learn it and teach it. You have the computer, but obviously are not smart enough to hear what it is telling you. Was it not written that there would come a day when the voice of God would be heard around the world?
The definition of a thing is binary. Which means that physicaly, every thing in the Universe is a binary expression. Language is thus not only Universal and Intelligible, but Grammar is Particular and Perceptible. The Savior of Life is not one man, it is as written, to become Mankind.

..for it was written, he that was known as Brian, shall be known as..Brian.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:26 pm ..for it was written, he that was known as Brian, shall be known as..Brian.

You actually believe that being dysfunctional is an art form?

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:29 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:26 pm ..for it was written, he that was known as Brian, shall be known as..Brian.

You actually believe that being dysfunctional is an art form?

..and he listened to those that pondered, those of little depth that rather a pond, a puddle. As they did think they thought so deep, so unfathomably fathoming the far reaches from their puddle, but alas, they could get to no further depth. For though they yearned, they had not yet earned thus, they merely did as most of them do, get lost and wander when all they needed to do, was look up and wonder, Y

Bark, bark, bark.

Interestingly, bark protects The Tree of Know_Ledge, SAP

LEAVE

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:11 pm It is written, that mankind will be the Savior of Life on this planet, so why does most religions claim that it is something else, even just one man?

A mind is a life support system. It is potentially the most powerful one possible for it allows us to predict the outcome of complex situations, i.e., every grammar is purposed to learn and use predictability, or again prophecy. Now, as demonstrated globally, binary grammar can process all information, when properly programmed. In short, a mind has to master two, and only two concepts.
Today there is no globally recognized standard for grammar systems, even though the computer is demonstrating it around the world.
So, does this indicate that the mind of man is functional, or is it still simply dysfunctional?

Mankind is still mentally incapable of doing his biologically defined job. The only possible way to change that is to learn it and teach it. You have the computer, but obviously are not smart enough to hear what it is telling you. Was it not written that there would come a day when the voice of God would be heard around the world?
The definition of a thing is binary. Which means that physicaly, every thing in the Universe is a binary expression. Language is thus not only Universal and Intelligible, but Grammar is Particular and Perceptible. The Savior of Life is not one man, it is as written, to become Mankind.

'Life', Itself, does NOT need a so-called 'savior', as 'Life' will go on ALWAYS, anyway.

What is needed though is for adult human beings to become kind, in order to make 'life', and 'living', BETTER FOR EVERY one. But, if you really want to believe that some so-called 'savior' of 'Life', Itself, is 'mankind', then okay.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 6:15 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:11 pm It is written, that mankind will be the Savior of Life on this planet, so why does most religions claim that it is something else, even just one man?

A mind is a life support system. It is potentially the most powerful one possible for it allows us to predict the outcome of complex situations, i.e., every grammar is purposed to learn and use predictability, or again prophecy. Now, as demonstrated globally, binary grammar can process all information, when properly programmed. In short, a mind has to master two, and only two concepts.
Today there is no globally recognized standard for grammar systems, even though the computer is demonstrating it around the world.
So, does this indicate that the mind of man is functional, or is it still simply dysfunctional?

Mankind is still mentally incapable of doing his biologically defined job. The only possible way to change that is to learn it and teach it. You have the computer, but obviously are not smart enough to hear what it is telling you. Was it not written that there would come a day when the voice of God would be heard around the world?
The definition of a thing is binary. Which means that physicaly, every thing in the Universe is a binary expression. Language is thus not only Universal and Intelligible, but Grammar is Particular and Perceptible. The Savior of Life is not one man, it is as written, to become Mankind.

'Life', Itself, does NOT need a so-called 'savior', as 'Life' will go on ALWAYS, anyway.

What is needed though is for adult human beings to become kind, in order to make 'life', and 'living', BETTER FOR EVERY one. But, if you really want to believe that some so-called 'savior' of 'Life', Itself, is 'mankind', then okay.

It is not a sign of intelligence when you cannot even follow a simple statement. Why does every form of life have life support systems if not to be the savior of that life?
duh!

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 6:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 6:15 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:11 pm It is written, that mankind will be the Savior of Life on this planet, so why does most religions claim that it is something else, even just one man?

A mind is a life support system. It is potentially the most powerful one possible for it allows us to predict the outcome of complex situations, i.e., every grammar is purposed to learn and use predictability, or again prophecy. Now, as demonstrated globally, binary grammar can process all information, when properly programmed. In short, a mind has to master two, and only two concepts.
Today there is no globally recognized standard for grammar systems, even though the computer is demonstrating it around the world.
So, does this indicate that the mind of man is functional, or is it still simply dysfunctional?

Mankind is still mentally incapable of doing his biologically defined job. The only possible way to change that is to learn it and teach it. You have the computer, but obviously are not smart enough to hear what it is telling you. Was it not written that there would come a day when the voice of God would be heard around the world?
The definition of a thing is binary. Which means that physicaly, every thing in the Universe is a binary expression. Language is thus not only Universal and Intelligible, but Grammar is Particular and Perceptible. The Savior of Life is not one man, it is as written, to become Mankind.

'Life', Itself, does NOT need a so-called 'savior', as 'Life' will go on ALWAYS, anyway.

What is needed though is for adult human beings to become kind, in order to make 'life', and 'living', BETTER FOR EVERY one. But, if you really want to believe that some so-called 'savior' of 'Life', Itself, is 'mankind', then okay.

It is not a sign of intelligence when you cannot even follow a simple statement. Why does every form of life have life support systems if not to be the savior of that life?
duh!

Just because 'you', ALONE, SAY and CLAIM that EVERY 'form of life' HAS 'life support systems', in NO WAY MEANS that THEN what follows IS the so-called 'savior or Life, Itself' is what you call 'mankind'.

Again, adult human beings NEED to learn HOW to become 'kind' WITH EVERY thing, and 'that' itself WILL PREVENT and STOP the EXTINCTION of human beings.

Why can you NOT just follow this VERY SIMPLE statement.

Also, do NOT FORGET that it is ONLY A SIGN of the 'human ego' and of your OWN 'self-importance' that LED you TO BELIEVE that 'humankind', "themselves", ARE the, laughingly, called 'life support system', and 'savior' OF 'Life', Itself.

CONTRARY TO your BELIEF, here, "phil8659", 'Life', Itself, could exist, and even DID exist, WITHOUT you human beings, AT ALL. And, if you adult human beings continue on 'the way' that you ARE 'now', when this is being written, and do NOT want to CHANGE, FOR the BETTER, then 'Life', Itself, WILL CONTINUE TO EXIST WITHOUT AFTER you have ALL GONE.

Also, and by the way, the very 'things' that are NEEDED FOR each and EVERY 'living thing' is NOT some so-called 'savior' of that 'life form'. 'They' are just what IS NEEDED FOR 'that life form' to COME INTO Existence, Itself, and TO JUST EXIST.

The ONLY 'thing' you human beings NEED 'saving from' ARE "yourselves", ALONE. And, by the way, the ONLY 'thing' that CAN and WILL 'SAVE' you, ARE "yourselves" ALONE, and ONLY. you appear to be using the word 'savior', here, is some very strange and weird way. It would be like saying that the heart and lungs are 'the savior' of 'your lives', and/or air and water is 'the savior' of 'your lives'.

ALL these sorts of things are just a part of the 'living thing', itself, and/or 'brought the living thing' INTO Existence, itself. And, while 'living things' NEED 'things' 'they' are NOT necessarily 'saving lives'. But, if you want to SAY that hearts and lungs 'save lives', then all well and good. But, 'TRYING TO' CLAIM things like, 'mankind' is the 'life support system' of 'Life', Itself, and are, here, to SAVE 'Life', Itself, then this is just ABSURD and RIDICULOUS.

Life, like Existence, do NOT have so-called 'life support systems'. 'They' EXIST ALWAYS. (Unless, OF COURSE, you want to SAY and CLAIM that the two FUNDAMENTAL things of Life, and of Existence, themselves, are their 'life support systems', but then you would be GOING TO the ACTUAL Truth of things. Which would be GREAT, if this is what you were INTENDING and/or ACTUALLY DOING).

you human beings who HAVE 'things' that SUPPORT you TO LIVE, but calling 'them' 'saviors' is NOT what most people would CONSIDER.

Now, ONCE AGAIN, if you would like to PRESENT ACTUAL SPECIFIC examples, then GREAT. 'We' then, at least, would have some 'thing' to LOOK AT, CONSIDER, and then DISCUSS.

bark, bark, bark, bark. is it not a joy to chase cars!

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 7:13 am bark, bark, bark, bark. is it not a joy to chase cars!

Imagine starting a thread where you can NOT back up nor support ANY thing you SAID and CLAIMED in it, and all you end up RESORT TO are making comments like the ones quoted, here.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:29 pm

attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Mar 26, 2025 9:26 pm ..for it was written, he that was known as Brian, shall be known as..Brian.

You actually believe that being dysfunctional is an art form?

Without agreeing with the application of the label, dysfunction is the essence of the Dada Art Form Technique (DAFT) of communication.

An example of Dada in daily life occurs when a suburbanite purposely raises the lawn mower blade high enough to not touch the grass, then follows the old habits of methodically firing up the machine and walking the old familiar patterns around his lawn, polluting the air and silence with his dysfunctional efforts while not cutting a blade of the vegetation that propaganda tells the HOA must be tidy and trim. Dada emerged during the cultural era that produced the senseless horrors of WWI. Given the modern absurdities caused by governments, DAFT still has a home.

Facial tattoos could be another example of DAFT.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bQnxlHZsjY

The inability to focus on a topic is called ADHD.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 27, 2025 4:23 pm The inability to focus on a topic is called ADHD.

Since in the big picture everything causes everything, Dada is more of an unorthodox approach rather than one simply deficient in traditional, rote approaches that have resulted in the world as it is, and the one during the cultural climate of The Big One.

After all, none of us here are on the clock or payroll dependent on a bottom line, although old habits can die hard.

The inability to focus is still the inability to focus, no matter what you say. The ability to focus has been the target of meditation for literally centuries, long before the Industrial Drug pushes ever came into the picture.

I started practicing as a small child and got up to being able to focus for months on end until I solved problems historically claimed impossible to solve, those solutions are not demonstrable in Algebra and Geometry today.

So, in case you have not noticed, the whole world is, as you say, on the clock. You did not even notice that you set yourself as a standard.